Medbø Jon Ingulf, Welde Boye
Faculty for Teacher Education, Culture, and Sports, Institute of Language, Literature, Mathematics and Interpretation, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
School of Sport Sciences, University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 7;4:772049. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.772049. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to examine how relationships between exercise intensity and the rate of energy release established in different ways, affect the calculated O deficit accumulated during strenuous exercise. Aerobic energy release is readily measured by the O uptake, while anaerobic energy release is by definition independent of O. The latter is not easily measured during strenuous exercise, but it can be estimated using the accumulated O deficit principle. We have calculated it using nine different approaches. Thirteen moderately trained persons (three women) volunteered to serve as subjects for cycle ergometry. Their maximal O uptake was 2.9 ± 0.6 mmol s ( ± ; 3.9 ± 0.8 L min). Our reference method (M0) is based on measuring the steady state O uptake at the end of at least ten bouts of 10 min of exercise at constant intensity, varying between 30 and 40% of that corresponding to the maximal O uptake and up to a power >90% of the maximal O uptake, which is a rather time-consuming method. The outcomes of eight different simpler approaches have been compared with those of the reference method. The main result is that the accumulated O deficit calculated depends a great deal on the relationship used to calculate it. A protocol of stepwise increases in exercise intensity every 4 min appeared to work well. A gross efficiency method showed the poorest performance. Another important result is that at constant power the O uptake continued to increase beyond 4 min of exercise at all powers examined, also at powers well-below those corresponding to the lactate threshold. Finally, the O uptake during loadless pedaling was considerably higher than resting O uptake, and it appeared to follow a cubic function of the pedaling frequency. In conclusion, to obtain reliable values of the anaerobic energy release using the accumulated O deficit principle, reliable relationships between exercise intensity and O demand must be established.
本研究的目的是探讨以不同方式建立的运动强度与能量释放速率之间的关系,如何影响在剧烈运动期间累积的计算氧亏。有氧能量释放可通过摄氧量轻松测量,而无氧能量释放根据定义与氧无关。后者在剧烈运动期间不易测量,但可使用累积氧亏原理进行估算。我们使用了九种不同的方法进行计算。13名中度训练的人(3名女性)自愿作为自行车测功的受试者。他们的最大摄氧量为2.9±0.6 mmol/s(±;3.9±0.8 L/min)。我们的参考方法(M0)基于在至少十次10分钟恒定强度运动结束时测量稳态摄氧量,运动强度在对应最大摄氧量的30%至40%之间变化,直至功率超过最大摄氧量的90%,这是一种相当耗时的方法。已将八种不同的更简单方法的结果与参考方法的结果进行了比较。主要结果是,计算出的累积氧亏在很大程度上取决于用于计算它的关系。每4分钟逐步增加运动强度的方案似乎效果良好。一种总效率方法表现最差。另一个重要结果是,在所有测试功率下,在恒定功率运动4分钟后,摄氧量仍继续增加,即使在远低于乳酸阈值对应的功率下也是如此。最后,无负荷蹬踏期间的摄氧量明显高于静息摄氧量,并且它似乎遵循蹬踏频率的三次函数。总之,为了使用累积氧亏原理获得可靠的无氧能量释放值,必须建立运动强度与氧需求之间可靠的关系。