Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6097-6107. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08706-6. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of pretreatment circulation collateral scoring (CS) system using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in predicting favorable functional outcome (FFO) after intra-arterial endovascular thrombectomy (IA-EVT). Subgroup analysis characterizing scoring systems within each category was additionally conducted.
We performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to assess the sensitivity and specificity of each CS system by using DSA and CTA, respectively. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) models were used to estimate the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC). The Bayes theorem was employed to determine posttest probability (PTP).
In total, 14 and 21 studies were assessed with DSA and CTA, respectively. In DSA, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.79) and 0.61 (0.53-0.68), respectively, and in the HSROC model, the DOR was 3.94 (2.71-5.73), and the AUC was 0.71 (90.67-0.75). CTA revealed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.74 (0.64-0.82) and 0.53 (0.44-0.62), respectively, and in the HSROC model, the DOR was 3.17 (2.34-4.50), and the AUC was 0.67 (0.63-0.71). With a pretest probability of 26.3%, the CS in DSA and CTA exhibited limited increase of PTPs of 39% and 36%, respectively, in detecting the FFO on day 90.
DSA and CTA have comparable accuracy and are limited in predicting the functional outcome. The collateral score systems assessed with DSA and CTA were more suitable for screening than diagnosis for patients before IA-EVT.
• Our study revealed the differences of various scoring systems for assessing collateral status. • DSA and CTA have comparable accuracy, but both imaging modalities played relatively limited roles in predicting functional outcome on day 90. • The collateral score systems assessed with DSA and CTA were more suitable for screening than diagnosis for patients before IA-EVT.
本研究比较了基于数字减影血管造影(DSA)和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的预处理循环侧支评分(CS)系统在预测动脉内血管内血栓切除术(IA-EVT)后良好功能结局(FFO)方面的诊断准确性。此外,还对每个分类中的评分系统进行了亚组分析。
我们进行了一项诊断性荟萃分析,分别使用 DSA 和 CTA 评估每个 CS 系统的敏感性和特异性。使用层次综合受试者工作特征曲线(HSROC)模型估计诊断比值比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)。贝叶斯定理用于确定后验概率(PTP)。
总共评估了 14 项基于 DSA 和 21 项基于 CTA 的研究。在 DSA 中,合并的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.72(95%置信区间,0.63-0.79)和 0.61(0.53-0.68),在 HSROC 模型中,DOR 为 3.94(2.71-5.73),AUC 为 0.71(90.67-0.75)。CTA 显示合并的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.74(0.64-0.82)和 0.53(0.44-0.62),在 HSROC 模型中,DOR 为 3.17(2.34-4.50),AUC 为 0.67(0.63-0.71)。在术前概率为 26.3%的情况下,DSA 和 CTA 的 CS 检测第 90 天的 FFO 仅使 PTP 分别增加 39%和 36%。
DSA 和 CTA 的准确性相当,在预测功能结局方面均有一定局限性。与 IA-EVT 前的患者的诊断相比,DSA 和 CTA 评估的侧支评分系统更适合用于筛查。
本研究揭示了不同侧支状态评估评分系统之间的差异。
DSA 和 CTA 的准确性相当,但这两种成像方式在预测第 90 天的功能结局方面作用相对有限。
与 IA-EVT 前的患者的诊断相比,DSA 和 CTA 评估的侧支评分系统更适合用于筛查。