Suppr超能文献

缺血性卒中的侧支循环状态:计算机断层扫描血管造影、计算机断层扫描灌注和数字减影血管造影的比较

Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography.

作者信息

Kauw Frans, Dankbaar Jan W, Martin Blake W, Ding Victoria Y, Boothroyd Derek B, van Ommen Fasco, de Jong Hugo W A M, Kappelle L Jaap, Velthuis Birgitta K, Heit Jeremy J, Wintermark Max

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

From the Department of Neuroradiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Nov/Dec;44(6):984-992. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted κ and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ≤ 2).

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome.

摘要

目的

比较单相计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影(CTA)、CT灌注衍生的三相CTA、多相CTA和时间最大密度投影(tMIP)图像对侧支循环的评估与数字减影血管造影(DSA),并将急性缺血性卒中患者的侧支循环评估与临床结局相关联。

方法

纳入在进行颈动脉、M1或M2段闭塞的血栓切除术之前接受CT灌注、CTA和DSA检查的连续急性缺血性卒中患者。两名观察者使用静态和动态(改良的美国介入和治疗神经放射学会)侧支循环分级方法评估所有CT图像,一名独立观察者评估DSA(参考标准)。分别用Cohen加权κ和一致性相关系数对观察者间的一致性和一致性进行量化。影像学评估与临床结局(改良Rankin量表,≤2)相关。

结果

对于静态评估,观察者间一致性(n = 101)在tMIP为0.46、三相CTA为0.58、多相CTA为0.67、单相CTA为0.69;对于动态评估,三相CTA为0.52、多相CTA为0.54。对于静态评估,一致性相关系数(n = 80)在三相CTA为0.08、单相CTA为0.09、多相CTA为0.23;对于动态评估,三相CTA为0.10、多相CTA为0.27。多相CTA(优势比[OR],1.7;95%置信区间[CI],1.1 - 2.7)和tMIP图像(OR,2.0;95%CI,1.1 - 3.4)上较高的静态侧支循环评分与改良Rankin量表评分为2或更低相关,三相CTA(OR,1.5;95%CI,1.1 - 2.2)和多相CTA(OR,1.7;95%CI,1.1 - 2.6)上较高的改良美国介入和治疗神经放射学会评分也与之相关。

结论

CT和DSA评估之间的一致性较差。三相CTA和多相CTA评估的侧支循环状态与临床结局相关,而DSA评估的侧支循环状态与临床结局无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d066/7668337/5aaf50efc7c0/rct-44-984-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验