Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 43 Rue Bruyère St. 268J, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada.
Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;69(6):774-781. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many jurisdictions experienced surges in demand for critical care that strained or overwhelmed their healthcare system's ability to respond. A major surge necessitates a deviation from usual practices, including difficult decisions about how to allocate critical care resources. We present a framework to guide these decisions in the hope of saving the most lives as ethically as possible, while concurrently respecting, protecting, and fulfilling legal and human rights obligations. It was developed in Ontario in 2020-2021 through an iterative consultation process with diverse participants, but was adopted in other jurisdictions with some modifications. The framework features three levels of triage depending on the degree of the surge, and a system for prioritizing patients based on their short-term mortality risk following the onset of critical illness. It also includes processes aimed at promoting consistency and fairness across a region where many hospitals are expected to apply the same framework. No triage framework should ever be considered "final," and there is a need for further research to examine ethical issues related to critical care triage and to increase the extent and quality of evidence to inform critical care triage.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多司法管辖区对重症监护的需求激增,这给医疗系统应对疫情的能力带来了压力。重大疫情需要偏离常规做法,包括对如何分配重症监护资源做出艰难决策。我们提出了一个框架来指导这些决策,希望尽可能在符合伦理的情况下挽救最多的生命,同时尊重、保护和履行法律和人权义务。该框架于 2020-2021 年在安大略省通过与不同参与者的迭代协商过程开发,但在其他司法管辖区进行了一些修改后采用。该框架具有三个级别的分类,具体取决于疫情的严重程度,以及根据患者在重症发作后短期死亡风险对患者进行优先排序的系统。它还包括旨在促进一个地区内一致性和公平性的流程,预计该地区的许多医院都将应用相同的框架。没有一个分诊框架应该被认为是“最终的”,需要进一步研究与重症监护分诊相关的伦理问题,并增加相关证据的范围和质量,以为重症监护分诊提供信息。