Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
J Community Psychol. 2022 Sep;50(8):3387-3401. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22842. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
The aim of this study was to explore experiences of homelessness in an affluent university town. Seven homeless men were recruited at a welfare program for homeless people to participate in in-depth, semistructured interviews that explored their experiences of homelessness in the town. The ages of the participants ranged from 36 to 52 years. There were three White participants, two of mixed race, and two Black participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data, from a bottom-up systems perspective. The results revealed some of the participants' drug-related experiences, their structural experiences (e.g., shelter policy, low wages, and the poverty trap), their social experiences (e.g., the loss of their families and the lack of social standards in the homeless community), and their psychological experiences (i.e., fatalism, complacency, and responsibility). Subsidized housing and social grants are unlikely to effectively address the homelessness of men if other components of their experience, such as their drug-related experiences, their structural experiences, their social experiences, and their psychological experiences, are not attended to.
本研究旨在探索富裕大学城的无家可归者的体验。在一个为无家可归者提供福利的项目中,招募了 7 名无家可归者男性参与深入的半结构化访谈,以探讨他们在城镇中的无家可归经历。参与者的年龄从 36 岁到 52 岁不等。其中有 3 名白人参与者,2 名混血参与者,2 名黑人参与者。采用自下而上的系统视角进行主题分析来分析数据。研究结果揭示了一些参与者的与毒品相关的经历、他们的结构性经历(例如,收容政策、低工资和贫困陷阱)、他们的社会经历(例如,失去家人和无家可归社区缺乏社会规范)以及他们的心理经历(即宿命论、自满和责任感)。如果不关注他们的其他方面的经历,例如与毒品相关的经历、结构性经历、社会经历和心理经历,那么补贴住房和社会补助不太可能有效地解决这些男性的无家可归问题。