• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于个体女性生殖轨迹的坦桑尼亚女性分娩地点决策过程分析:生命历程视角。

Understanding women's decision-making process for birth location in Tanzania based on individual women's reproductive pathways: a life-course perspective.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Institute of Health and Society, Department of Community Medicine and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2040149. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2040149.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2022.2040149
PMID:35322765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8956304/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determinants for women's care seeking for birth in low-income setting are multifactorial and remain poorly understood. A life course approach can assist to structure the interplay of the different factors that lead to women seeking care or not.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to explore individual women's reproductive pathways, and increase understanding of how important life events including previous pregnancy and birth experiences can help us to understand individual choices made for care seeking during childbirth.

METHODS

The study took place in Tanzania between 2015 and 2017. 14 women were followed throughout their pregnancy, birth and postpartum period through participant observation and in-depth interviews. In total 94 in-depth interviews were held (between 5-7 interviews per woman). Analysis occurred continuous throughout the data collection period resulting in detailed narratives of crucial events across women's life course, with specific attention to their current pregnancy.

RESULTS

Of the 14 women, seven had a facility birth, six a home birth and one woman gave birth at the home of a local birth attendant. Four different story plots were identified: expected home birth, expected facility birth, unexpected facility birth and unexpected home birth. Birth narratives of four women representative of the different story plots are presented. Narratives illustrate women's individual reproductive pathways including the various factors influencing women's expectations and justifications for their actions during their pregnancy and birth.

CONCLUSION

Women's agency, including women's perception of self, the self in relation to the social environment and reflection on risks associated with the range of options, influences the final decision made for birth. Women's narratives suggest that quality of care can function as a primary pull factor for facility birth. As long as home birth is by some perceived to be a better alternative, achieving skilled care for all will be difficult to achieve.

摘要

背景

在低收入环境中,女性寻求分娩护理的决定因素是多方面的,目前仍了解不足。生命历程方法可以帮助构建导致女性寻求或不寻求护理的不同因素之间的相互作用。

目的

在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨个体女性的生殖途径,并增加对重要生命事件(包括以前的妊娠和分娩经历)如何帮助我们理解个体在分娩时寻求护理的选择的理解。

方法

该研究于 2015 年至 2017 年在坦桑尼亚进行。通过参与观察和深入访谈,14 名女性在整个妊娠、分娩和产后期间接受了跟踪。总共进行了 94 次深入访谈(每位女性 5-7 次访谈)。分析在数据收集期间持续进行,导致了女性生命历程中关键事件的详细叙述,特别关注她们当前的妊娠。

结果

在 14 名女性中,有 7 人在医疗机构分娩,6 人在家分娩,1 人在当地分娩助手的家中分娩。确定了四个不同的故事情节:预期的家庭分娩、预期的医疗机构分娩、意外的医疗机构分娩和意外的家庭分娩。呈现了代表不同故事情节的四名女性的分娩叙述。叙述说明了女性的个体生殖途径,包括影响女性在妊娠和分娩期间期望和行动的各种因素。

结论

女性的能动性,包括女性对自我的认知、自我与社会环境的关系以及对与各种选择相关的风险的思考,影响了最终的分娩决策。女性的叙述表明,护理质量可以作为医疗机构分娩的主要吸引力因素。只要家庭分娩被认为是一个更好的选择,就很难实现所有产妇都能获得熟练护理的目标。

相似文献

1
Understanding women's decision-making process for birth location in Tanzania based on individual women's reproductive pathways: a life-course perspective.基于个体女性生殖轨迹的坦桑尼亚女性分娩地点决策过程分析:生命历程视角。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2040149. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2040149.
2
Women's experiences of mistreatment during childbirth: A comparative view of home- and facility-based births in Pakistan.女性在分娩过程中遭受虐待的经历:巴基斯坦家庭分娩和机构分娩的比较视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194601. eCollection 2018.
3
"It is because the treatment of this lady is a cascade": Accumulation of delays and the occurrence of obstetric emergencies in an urban maternity unit in Tanzania.“正是因为这位女士的治疗是一个级联过程”:坦桑尼亚一个城市妇产科单位中延误的积累和产科急症的发生。
Midwifery. 2024 Mar;130:103926. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103926. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Birth location preferences of mothers and fathers in rural Ghana: Implications for pregnancy, labor and birth outcomes.加纳农村地区父母对分娩地点的偏好:对妊娠、分娩及分娩结局的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 12;15:165. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0604-2.
5
A lack of reproductive agency in facility-based births makes home births a first choice regardless of potential risks and medical needs-a qualitative study among multiparous women in Somaliland.在基于设施的分娩中缺乏生殖代理权使得无论潜在风险和医疗需求如何,家庭分娩都是首选-在索马里兰的多产妇中进行的一项定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2054110. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2054110.
6
Exploring women's experiences of care during hospital childbirth in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study.探讨坦桑尼亚农村地区女性在医院分娩期间的护理体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06396-0.
7
Women's Choice to Deliver at Home: Understanding the Psychosocial and Cultural Factors Influencing Birthing Choices for Unskilled Home Delivery among Women in Southwestern Uganda.乌干达西南部女性选择在家分娩:了解影响未受过专业培训在家分娩的生育选择的社会心理和文化因素。
J Pregnancy. 2020 Jun 3;2020:6596394. doi: 10.1155/2020/6596394. eCollection 2020.
8
Is it home delivery or health facility? Community perceptions on place of childbirth in rural Northwest Tanzania using a qualitative approach.是家庭分娩还是医疗机构?坦桑尼亚西北部农村地区以定性方法评估对分娩地点的社区认知。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02967-z.
9
Modeling the relationship between women's perceptions and future intention to use institutional maternity care in the Western Highlands of Guatemala.危地马拉高地西部地区女性对机构性产科护理的认知与未来使用意向之间的关系建模。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 11;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0448-5.
10
Factors influencing adoption of facility-assisted delivery - a qualitative study of women and other stakeholders in a Maasai community in Ngorongoro District, Tanzania.影响设施辅助分娩采用的因素——坦桑尼亚恩戈罗恩戈罗区马赛社区妇女和其他利益攸关方的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2728-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's autonomy and maternal health decision making in Kenya: implications for service delivery reform - a qualitative study.肯尼亚的妇女自主权和母婴健康决策:对服务提供改革的影响——一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02965-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Symphysis-fundal height, gestational age and its value for identification of foetuses at risk in rural Tanzania: A qualitative follow-up study.耻骨联合上缘至宫底高度、孕周及其在坦桑尼亚农村地区识别高危胎儿中的价值:一项定性随访研究。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;25(5):140-149. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2021/v25i5.15.
2
Towards renewed commitment to prevent maternal mortality and morbidity: learning from 30 years of maternal health priorities.为重新致力于预防孕产妇死亡和发病:借鉴30年孕产妇健康优先事项的经验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2174245. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2174245.
3
The Use of Ethnography in Maternity Care.人种志在产科护理中的应用。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Jun 28;8:23333936211028187. doi: 10.1177/23333936211028187. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Disrespect and abuse in maternity care: individual consequences of structural violence.孕产妇护理中的不尊重与虐待:结构性暴力的个体后果
Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):88-106. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1502023. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Where women go to deliver: understanding the changing landscape of childbirth in Africa and Asia.妇女分娩的去处:了解非洲和亚洲分娩状况的变化。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1146-1152. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx060.
6
The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care.分娩护理的规模、范围、涵盖面和能力。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2193-2208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31528-8. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action.为全球各地的每位妇女提供优质的孕产妇保健:行动呼吁。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2307-2320. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31333-2. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Maternity care and Human Rights: what do women think?孕产妇保健与人权:女性怎么看?
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jul 2;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0091-1.
9
Women and Health: the key for sustainable development.妇女与健康:可持续发展的关键。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1165-210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60497-4. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
10
Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.低收入和中等收入国家基于医疗机构分娩的促进因素和障碍:一项定性证据综合分析
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71.