Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物(非法药物)过量死亡的第四波高峰以及处方阿片类药物和介入技术可及性的下降:因果关系

Fourth Wave of Opioid (Illicit Drug) Overdose Deaths and Diminishing Access to Prescription Opioids and Interventional Techniques: Cause and Effect.

作者信息

Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Singh Vanila Mathur, Staats Peter S, Trescot Andrea M, Prunskis John, Knezevic Nebojsa Nick, Soin Amol, Kaye Alan D, Atluri Sairam, Boswell Mark V, Abd-Elsayed Alaa, Hirsch Joshua A

机构信息

Pain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY and Evansville, IN; LSU Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):97-124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, data has shown that age-adjusted overdose death rates involving synthetic opioids, psychostimulants, cocaine, and heroin have been increasing, including prescription opioid deaths, which were declining, but, recently, reversing the trends. Contrary to widely held perceptions, the problem of misuse, abuse, and diversion of prescription opioids has been the least of all the factors in recent years. Consequently, it is important to properly distinguish between the role of illicit and prescription opioids in the current opioid crisis. Multiple efforts have been based on consensus on administrative policies for certain harm reduction strategies for individuals actively using illicit drugs and reducing opioid prescriptions leading to curbing of medically needed opioids, which have been ineffective. While there is no denial that prescription opioids can be misused, abused, and diverted, the policies have oversimplified the issue by curbing prescription opioids and the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of severely limiting prescription opioids, without acknowledgement that opioids have legitimate uses for persons suffering from chronic pain. Similar to the opioid crisis, interventional pain management procedures have been affected by various policies being applied to reduce overuse, abuse, and finally utilization. Medical policies have been becoming more restrictive with reduction of access to certain procedures, with the pendulum swinging too far in the direction of limiting interventional techniques. Recent utilization assessments have shown a consistent decline for most interventional techniques, with a 18.7% decrease from 2019 to 2020. The causes for these dynamic changes are multifactorial likely including the misapplication of the 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for prescribing opioids for chronic pain, the relative ease of access to illicit synthetic opioids and more recently issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, recent publications have shown association of dose tapering with overdose or mental health crisis among patients prescribed long-term opioids. These findings are leading to the hypothesis that federal guidelines may inadvertently be contributing to an increase in overall opioid deaths and diminished access to interventional techniques. Together, these have resulted in a fourth wave of the opioid epidemic.

METHODS

A narrative review.

RESULTS

The fourth wave results from a confluence of multiple factors, including misapplication of CDC guidelines, the increased availability of illicit drugs, the COVID-19 pandemic, and policies reducing access to interventional procedures. The CDC guidelines and subsequent regulatory atmosphere have led to aggressive tapering up to and including, at times, the overall reduction or stoppage of opioid prescriptions. Forced tapering has been linked to an increase of 69% for overdoses and 130% for mental health crisis. The data thus suggests that the diminution in access to opioid prescriptions may be occurring simultaneously with an increase in illicit narcotic use.Combined with CDC guidelines, the curbing of opioid prescriptions to medically needed individuals, among non-opioid treatments, interventional techniques have been affected with declining utilization rates and medical policies reducing access to such modalities.

CONCLUSION

The opioid overdose waves over the past three decades have resulted from different etiologies. Wave one was associated with prescription opioid overdose deaths and wave two with the rise in heroin and overdose deaths from 1999 to 2013. Wave three was associated with a rise in synthetic opioid overdose deaths. Sadly, wave four continues to escalate with increasing number of deaths as a confluence of factors including the CDC guidelines, the COVID pandemic, increased availability of illicit synthetic opioids and the reduction of access to interventional techniques, which leads patients to seek remedies on their own.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,数据显示,经年龄调整后,涉及合成阿片类药物、精神兴奋剂、可卡因和海洛因的过量用药死亡率一直在上升,包括此前呈下降趋势但最近出现逆转的处方阿片类药物死亡情况。与普遍看法相反,近年来,处方阿片类药物的滥用、误用和转移问题在所有因素中占比最小。因此,正确区分非法阿片类药物和处方阿片类药物在当前阿片类药物危机中的作用非常重要。多项举措基于对某些减少伤害策略行政政策的共识,这些策略针对积极使用非法药物的个人,并减少阿片类药物处方,导致抑制了医疗所需的阿片类药物,这些举措均未取得成效。虽然不可否认处方阿片类药物可能被滥用、误用和转移,但这些政策通过抑制处方阿片类药物过度简化了问题,而且钟摆已经过度摆向严重限制处方阿片类药物的方向,却没有认识到阿片类药物对慢性疼痛患者有合法用途。与阿片类药物危机类似,介入性疼痛管理程序也受到各种旨在减少过度使用、滥用并最终减少使用的政策影响。医疗政策变得越来越严格,减少了某些程序的可及性,钟摆过度摆向限制介入技术的方向。最近的使用情况评估显示,大多数介入技术的使用量持续下降,从2019年到2020年下降了18.7%。这些动态变化的原因是多方面的,可能包括2016年美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)关于慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南的错误应用、非法合成阿片类药物相对容易获取,以及最近与新冠疫情相关的问题。此外,最近的出版物显示,在长期使用阿片类药物的患者中,剂量逐渐减少与过量用药或心理健康危机有关。这些发现导致一种假设,即联邦指南可能在无意中导致总体阿片类药物死亡人数增加,并减少了介入技术的可及性。这些因素共同导致了阿片类药物流行的第四波。

方法

叙述性综述。

结果

第四波是多种因素共同作用的结果,包括CDC指南的错误应用、非法药物供应增加、新冠疫情以及减少介入程序可及性的政策。CDC指南及随后的监管氛围导致激进的剂量逐渐减少,有时甚至包括总体减少或停止阿片类药物处方。强制逐渐减少剂量与过量用药增加69%和心理健康危机增加130%有关。因此,数据表明,阿片类药物处方可及性的降低可能与非法麻醉品使用的增加同时发生。结合CDC指南,对医疗需求者的阿片类药物处方进行限制,在非阿片类治疗中,介入技术受到影响,使用率下降,医疗政策减少了此类治疗方式的可及性。

结论

过去三十年的阿片类药物过量用药浪潮由不同病因导致。第一波与处方阿片类药物过量用药死亡有关,第二波与1999年至2013年海洛因及过量用药死亡人数上升有关。第三波与合成阿片类药物过量用药死亡人数上升有关。可悲的是,第四波仍在升级,死亡人数不断增加,这是包括CDC指南、新冠疫情、非法合成阿片类药物供应增加以及介入技术可及性降低等多种因素共同作用的结果,这导致患者自行寻求治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验