All authors are with the Texas Policy Evaluation Project, University of Texas at Austin. Samuel L. Dickman is also with Planned Parenthood South Texas, San Antonio. Kari White is also with the Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin. Daniel Grossman is also with the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Am J Public Health. 2022 May;112(5):758-761. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306701. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
To identify financial hardships related to costs of obtaining abortion care in Texas, which has the highest uninsured rate in the United States and restricts insurance coverage for abortions. We surveyed patients seeking abortion at 12 Texas clinics in 2018 regarding costs and financial hardships related to abortion care. We compared mean out-of-pocket costs and the percentage reporting hardships across income and insurance categories. Of 603 respondents, 42% were Latinx, 25% White, and 21% Black or African American, and most (62.0%) reported having low incomes (< 200% federal poverty level). Mean out-of-pocket costs were $634, which varied little across insurance groups. Patients with low incomes were more likely to obtain financial assistance from an abortion fund than were wealthier patients (12.3% vs 1.6%, respectively; < .05). Financial hardships related to abortion costs were more common among uninsured (57.6%) and publicly insured (55.1%) patients than those with private insurance (48.2%). One in 5 (19.8%) uninsured respondents delayed buying food to pay for abortion care. Restrictions on insurance coverage for abortions result in high out-of-pocket costs and major financial hardships for most patients with low incomes in Texas. (. 2022;112(5):758-761. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306701).
为了确定与在德克萨斯州获得堕胎护理相关的经济困难,德克萨斯州的保险覆盖率最低,并且限制了堕胎保险。我们在 2018 年对德克萨斯州 12 家诊所的 603 名寻求堕胎的患者进行了调查,了解与堕胎护理相关的费用和经济困难。我们比较了不同收入和保险类别患者的平均自付费用和报告困难的百分比。在 603 名受访者中,42%是拉丁裔,25%是白人,21%是黑人和非裔美国人,大多数(62.0%)报告收入低(<200%联邦贫困线)。平均自付费用为 634 美元,在不同的保险组之间差异不大。低收入患者比富裕患者更有可能从堕胎基金获得经济援助(分别为 12.3%和 1.6%;<0.05)。与私人保险相比,没有保险(57.6%)和公共保险(55.1%)的患者更有可能因堕胎费用而面临经济困难。五分之一(19.8%)的无保险受访者为支付堕胎费用而推迟购买食物。对堕胎保险的限制导致德克萨斯州大多数低收入患者的自付费用高昂,并面临重大经济困难。(。2022;112(5):758-761. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306701)。