Suppr超能文献

在堕胎敌对州寻求财务和实际支持:肯塔基州 2014-2021 年堕胎基金数据分析

Seeking financial and practical support in an abortion-hostile state: Analysis of abortion fund data in Kentucky, 2014-2021: Analysis of abortion fund data in Kentucky.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Health Management and Systems Sciences, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):222-227. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12279. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Philanthropic abortion funds are integral to accessing care in the United States, providing both financial and practical assistance. Yet relatively little is known about those who seek these essential services. In this study, we analyzed data from a Kentucky abortion fund to assess characteristics of abortion fund callers.

METHODS

We analyzed 2014-2021 administrative data from the Kentucky Health Justice Network's (KHJN) Abortion Support Fund and compared them to abortion data from the Kentucky Department for Public Health (KDPH). We analyzed age, race, and pregnancy gestation at calling (KHJN) and abortion (KDPH), and calculated Z-scores and p-values to compare proportions in each category between the two data sources.

RESULTS

The fund supported 6162 people from 2014 to 2021, when 28,741 people had abortions in Kentucky. Compared with KDPH data, KHJN had a higher percentage of callers who were under age 30, a higher percentage of callers who were Black or another race, and a higher percentage of callers at 14 weeks' gestation or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with state data, KHJN supported a higher percentage of young people, people of color, and people at later gestations. These findings support evidence that structurally vulnerable groups are more likely to face barriers to care and that abortion funds provide essential support necessary for reproductive equity.

摘要

目的

慈善堕胎基金是在美国获得医疗服务的重要组成部分,为寻求堕胎的人提供经济和实际援助。然而,人们对这些寻求这些基本服务的人知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们分析了肯塔基州堕胎基金的资料,以评估堕胎基金来电者的特征。

方法

我们分析了肯塔基健康正义网络(KHJN)堕胎支持基金 2014 年至 2021 年的管理资料,并将其与肯塔基州公共卫生部(KDPH)的堕胎资料进行了比较。我们分析了来电者的年龄、种族和怀孕时期(KHJN)和堕胎(KDPH),并计算了 Z 分数和 p 值,以比较两个资料来源中每个类别的比例。

结果

该基金在 2014 年至 2021 年期间为 6162 人提供了支持,而肯塔基州同期有 28741 人堕胎。与 KDPH 资料相比,KHJN 的来电者中年龄在 30 岁以下的比例较高,黑人或其他种族的比例较高,怀孕 14 周或以上的比例较高。

结论

与州资料相比,KHJN 支持了更多的年轻人、少数族裔和怀孕后期的人。这些发现支持了这样的证据,即结构上脆弱的群体更有可能面临获得医疗服务的障碍,而堕胎基金为生殖公平提供了必要的支持。

相似文献

4
The undue burden of paying for abortion: An exploration of abortion fund cases.支付堕胎费用的不合理负担:堕胎基金案例探究
Soc Work Health Care. 2017 Feb;56(2):99-114. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2016.1263270. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

8
Who loses access to legal abortion with a 6-week ban?六周禁令实施后,哪些人会失去合法堕胎的机会?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;227(5):777-780. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.032. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验