Suppr超能文献

在加利福尼亚州的法律豁免下,由执业护士、认证护士助产士和医师助理进行吸引流产的安全性。

Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver.

机构信息

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94612, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar;103(3):454-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301159. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined the impact on patient safety if nurse practitioners (NPs), certified nurse midwives (CNMs), and physician assistants (PAs) were permitted to provide aspiration abortions in California.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 11 487 early aspiration abortions completed by physicians (n = 5812) and newly trained NPs, CNMs, and PAs (n = 5675) from 4 Planned Parenthood affiliates and Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, by using a noninferiority design with a predetermined acceptable risk difference of 2%. All complications up to 4 weeks after the abortion were included.

RESULTS

Of the 11 487 aspiration abortions analyzed, 1.3% (n = 152) resulted in a complication: 1.8% for NP-, CNM-, and PA-performed aspirations and 0.9% for physician-performed aspirations. The unadjusted risk difference for total complications between NP-CNM-PA and physician groups was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45, 1.29) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.33, 1.33) in a propensity score-matched sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Abortion complications were clinically equivalent between newly trained NPs, CNMs, and PAs and physicians, supporting the adoption of policies to allow these providers to perform early aspirations to expand access to abortion care.

摘要

目的

我们研究了如果允许执业护士(NPs)、认证护士助产士(CNMs)和医师助理(PAs)在加利福尼亚提供抽吸性流产,对患者安全的影响。

方法

在一项前瞻性、观察性研究中,我们通过非劣效性设计,使用预先确定的可接受风险差异为 2%,评估了来自 4 个计划生育联合会和 Kaiser Permanente of Northern California 的 11487 例早期抽吸性流产的结果,这些流产由医生(n=5812)和新培训的 NPs、CNMs 和 PAs(n=5675)完成。包括流产后 4 周内的所有并发症。

结果

在分析的 11487 例抽吸性流产中,1.3%(n=152)出现并发症:NP、CNM 和 PA 执行的抽吸术并发症发生率为 1.8%,而医生执行的抽吸术并发症发生率为 0.9%。NP-CNM-PA 和医生组之间总并发症的未调整风险差异为 0.87(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.45,1.29)和 0.83(95% CI = 0.33,1.33)在倾向评分匹配样本中。

结论

新培训的 NPs、CNMs 和 PAs 与医生之间的流产并发症在临床上相当,支持采取政策允许这些提供者进行早期抽吸术,以扩大堕胎护理的可及性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2

本文引用的文献

3
Who has second-trimester abortions in the United States?在美国,哪些人会进行中期妊娠流产?
Contraception. 2012 Jun;85(6):544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008.2008 年美国的堕胎发生率和服务可及性。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Mar;43(1):41-50. doi: 10.1363/4304111. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
7
Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions.基层医疗保健:当前问题与解决方案。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):799-805. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0026.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验