Suppr超能文献

利用干血斑卡片评估麻疹、甲型肝炎、破伤风、流感和水痘带状疱疹疫苗接种个体的血清学反应。

The use of dried blood spot cards to assess serologic responses of individuals vaccinated against measles, hepatitis A, tetanus, influenza and varicella zoster.

机构信息

Department of Research Programs, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Henry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265813. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Traditional blood sampling by venipuncture is cumbersome and relatively expensive. Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is desirable because of its ease of sample collection, transportation and storage. It has been used in clinical diagnosis but not been thoroughly studied for the potential use to assess the immune status of individuals following natural infection or preventive vaccination. The goal of this study was to compare DBS to traditional blood samplings in detection of antibodies in individuals vaccinated against measles, hepatitis A, tetanus, influenza and varicella zoster. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to test DBS eluates and serum samples for antibodies against measles, varicella, tetanus and hepatitis A. Sensitivities, specificities, and correlation coefficients were evaluated to compare optical density (OD) values of paired serum and DBS samples. The long-term stability of DBS samples at different temperatures was assessed using simulated immune measles blood. DBS OD was highly correlated with serum OD for antibodies to measles (r = 0.93), varicella (r = 0.82), and tetanus (r = 0.91). Sensitivities of DBS OD ranged from 86-99% and specificities ranged from 96-100% using cut-offs established by each assay. By contrast, the hepatitis A data showed a low sensitivity (31%) and weak correlation (r = 0.14) between DBS and serum samples. Antibody titers in serum samples for anti-influenza A (H1N1 and H3N1) failed to correlate in DBS eluates in HAI and MN assays. DBS samples were stable for 4 weeks when stored at room temperature and for 6 months at 4°C. DBS sampling was sensitive, specific, and highly correlated with traditional venipuncture sampling in detection of antibodies against measles, tetanus and varicella zoster, but not hepatitis A and influenza. Thus, the success of using DBS sampling to assess the antibody levels in immunized individuals may be dependent on the pathogens and the development of the assay used.

摘要

传统的静脉采血方法繁琐且相对昂贵。由于其样本采集、运输和储存方便,干血斑(DBS)采样是理想的选择。它已被用于临床诊断,但尚未对其在评估个体自然感染或预防性接种后的免疫状态方面的潜在用途进行深入研究。本研究的目的是比较 DBS 与传统采血方法在检测麻疹、甲型肝炎、破伤风、流感和水痘带状疱疹疫苗接种者抗体方面的差异。酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于检测 DBS 洗脱液和血清样本中针对麻疹、水痘、破伤风和甲型肝炎的抗体。评估敏感性、特异性和相关系数,以比较配对血清和 DBS 样本的光密度(OD)值。使用模拟免疫麻疹血液评估不同温度下 DBS 样本的长期稳定性。DBS OD 与血清 OD 对麻疹(r = 0.93)、水痘(r = 0.82)和破伤风(r = 0.91)抗体的相关性很高。使用每个检测方法建立的截断值,DBS OD 的敏感性范围为 86-99%,特异性范围为 96-100%。相比之下,甲型肝炎数据显示 DBS 与血清样本之间的敏感性(31%)和相关性(r = 0.14)均较低。血凝抑制(HAI)和微量中和(MN)检测中,DBS 洗脱液中抗甲型流感 A(H1N1 和 H3N1)抗体滴度与血清样本不相关。DBS 样本在室温下储存 4 周和在 4°C 下储存 6 个月时均稳定。DBS 采样在检测麻疹、破伤风和水痘带状疱疹抗体方面具有敏感性、特异性和与传统静脉采血采样高度相关性,但在检测甲型肝炎和流感方面相关性较差。因此,使用 DBS 采样评估免疫个体抗体水平的成功可能取决于病原体和所使用的检测方法的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71eb/8947131/3785a251df11/pone.0265813.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验