Suppr超能文献

为何要在国家科学院、工程院和医学院的社会关怀框架中加入“废除”一词?

Why Add "Abolition" to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Social Care Framework?

作者信息

Gottlieb Laura M, Lindau Stacy Tessler, Peek Monica E

机构信息

Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.

Professor of obstetrics and gynecology and medicine-geriatrics as well as a practicing gynecologist at the University of Chicago in Illinois.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2022 Mar 1;24(3):E170-180. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.170.

Abstract

Abundant evidence demonstrates that enduring, endemic racism plays an important role in determining patient health. This commentary reviews a patient case about disease self-management and subsequent health outcomes that are shaped by social and economic circumstances. We analyze the case using a framework for social care developed in 2019 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). We then propose that the NASEM framework be adapted by adding the category , which could make the other social care practices transformative for historically marginalized populations.

摘要

大量证据表明,长期存在的、地方性的种族主义在决定患者健康方面起着重要作用。本评论回顾了一个关于疾病自我管理以及随后由社会和经济状况所塑造的健康结果的患者案例。我们使用美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(NASEM)于2019年制定的社会护理框架来分析该案例。然后我们建议对NASEM框架进行调整,增加一个类别,这可能会使其他社会护理实践对历史上被边缘化的人群具有变革性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db0b/9591153/5ad92c04e25f/nihms-1843197-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验