Suppr超能文献

定义诊断错误:评估国家科学院报告《改善医疗保健中的诊断》影响的范围综述。

Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care.

机构信息

MedStar Washington Hospital Center (MWHC), Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):770-778. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000999. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standards for accurate and timely diagnosis are ill-defined. In 2015, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) committee published a landmark report, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care , and proposed a new definition of diagnostic error, "the failure to ( a ) establish an accurate and timely explanation of the patient's health problem(s) or ( b ) communicate that explanation to the patient."

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore how researchers operationalize the NASEM's definition of diagnostic error with relevance to accuracy, timeliness, and/or communication in peer-reviewed published literature.

METHODS

Using the Arskey and O'Malley's framework framework, we identified published literature from October 2015 to February 2021 using Medline and Google Scholar. We also conducted subject matter expert interviews with researchers.

RESULTS

Of 34 studies identified, 16 were analyzed and abstracted to determine how diagnostic error was operationalized and measured. Studies were grouped by theme: epidemiology, patient focus, measurement/surveillance, and clinician focus. Nine studies indicated using the NASEM definition. Of those, 5 studies also operationalized with existing definitions proposed before the NASEM report. Four studies operationalized the components of the NASEM definition and did not cite existing definitions. Three studies operationalized error using existing definitions only. Subject matter experts indicated that the NASEM definition functions as foundation for researchers to conceptualize diagnostic error.

CONCLUSIONS

The NASEM report produced a common understanding of diagnostic error that includes accuracy, timeliness, and communication. In recent peer-reviewed literature, most researchers continue to use pre-NASEM report definitions to operationalize accuracy and timeliness. The report catalyzed the use of patient-centered concepts in the definition, resulting in emerging studies focused on examining errors related to communicating diagnosis to patients.

摘要

背景

准确和及时诊断的标准尚未明确。2015 年,美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(NASEM)委员会发布了一份具有里程碑意义的报告《改善医疗保健中的诊断》,并提出了诊断错误的新定义,“未能(a)准确及时地确定患者的健康问题(或 b)将该解释传达给患者”。

目的

本研究旨在探讨研究人员如何将 NASEM 对诊断错误的定义应用于同行评审发表文献中与准确性、及时性和/或沟通相关的内容。

方法

我们使用 Arskey 和 O'Malley 的框架,使用 Medline 和 Google Scholar 从 2015 年 10 月至 2021 年 2 月确定已发表的文献。我们还对研究人员进行了主题专家访谈。

结果

在确定的 34 项研究中,有 16 项进行了分析和摘要,以确定如何操作和衡量诊断错误。这些研究按主题分组:流行病学、患者重点、测量/监测和临床医生重点。9 项研究表明使用了 NASEM 定义。其中,5 项研究还使用了 NASEM 报告之前提出的现有定义进行了操作化。4 项研究操作化了 NASEM 定义的组成部分,并未引用现有定义。3 项研究仅使用现有定义操作化错误。主题专家表示,NASEM 定义为研究人员概念化诊断错误提供了基础。

结论

NASEM 报告为诊断错误提供了一个共同的理解,包括准确性、及时性和沟通。在最近的同行评审文献中,大多数研究人员继续使用 NASEM 报告之前的定义来操作准确性和及时性。该报告促进了患者为中心概念在定义中的应用,导致了一些新兴的研究专注于检查与向患者传达诊断相关的错误。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcef/9698189/c8b29c94c480/jps-18-00770-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验