• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鞘内注射布比卡因与氯普鲁卡因用于经阴道宫颈环扎术:一项回顾性队列研究。

Intrathecal bupivacaine versus chloroprocaine for transvaginal cervical cerclage placement: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Mims S C, Zanolli N C, Fuller M, Habib A S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 May;50:103276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103276. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103276
PMID:35325656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bupivacaine is commonly used in spinal anesthesia for cervical cerclage placement, but its long duration of action can delay hospital discharge. Chloroprocaine has a short duration of action and has re-emerged as an agent for ambulatory neuraxial anesthesia. There are limited data comparing intrathecal bupivacaine and chloroprocaine when used for cerclage placement. This retrospective study compares the time to hospital discharge between these drugs when used in spinal anesthesia for cervical cerclage placement.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transvaginal cerclage placement under neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine or plain chloroprocaine between January 1, 2015 and October 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the time to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of inadequate anesthesia, postoperative pain scores and postoperative neurologic symptoms.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty patients were included in the final analysis (bupivacaine n=236, chloroprocaine n=124). The median (IQR) intrathecal dose was 7.5 (7.5, 9) mg and 45 (45, 50) mg in the bupivacaine and chloroprocaine groups respectively. The time (median [IQR]) from spinal anesthesia to hospital discharge was significantly shorter in the chloroprocaine group compared with the bupivacaine group (218 [180, 253] vs. 370 [309, 424] min, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups for secondary outcomes and neither group had a patient report neurologic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

When utilized in spinal anesthesia for transvaginal cervical cerclage placement, chloroprocaine may reduce the time to discharge while providing comparable anesthesia to that provided by bupivacaine.

摘要

背景

布比卡因常用于宫颈环扎术的脊髓麻醉,但其作用时间长会延迟出院。氯普鲁卡因作用时间短,已重新成为门诊神经轴麻醉的药物。用于环扎术时,比较鞘内注射布比卡因和氯普鲁卡因的资料有限。这项回顾性研究比较了这两种药物用于宫颈环扎术脊髓麻醉时的出院时间。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月1日至2020年10月31日期间在神经轴麻醉下接受经阴道宫颈环扎术的患者,术中鞘内注射重比重布比卡因或普通氯普鲁卡因。主要结局是出院时间。次要结局包括麻醉不足的发生率、术后疼痛评分和术后神经症状。

结果

360例患者纳入最终分析(布比卡因组236例,氯普鲁卡因组124例)。布比卡因组和氯普鲁卡因组鞘内注射剂量的中位数(IQR)分别为7.5(7.5,9)mg和45(45,50)mg。与布比卡因组相比,氯普鲁卡因组从脊髓麻醉到出院的时间(中位数[IQR])显著缩短(218[180,253]分钟对370[309,424]分钟,P<0.001)。两组次要结局无显著差异,两组均无患者报告神经症状。

结论

在经阴道宫颈环扎术的脊髓麻醉中使用时,氯普鲁卡因可能会缩短出院时间,同时提供与布比卡因相当的麻醉效果。

相似文献

1
Intrathecal bupivacaine versus chloroprocaine for transvaginal cervical cerclage placement: a retrospective cohort study.鞘内注射布比卡因与氯普鲁卡因用于经阴道宫颈环扎术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 May;50:103276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103276. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.鞘内注射3% 2-氯普鲁卡因与0.75%重比重布比卡因用于宫颈环扎术的双盲随机对照试验
Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653.
3
ED 90 of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Fentanyl for Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage: A Sequential Allocation Biased-Coin Design.鞘内注射氯普鲁卡因联合芬太尼用于预防性宫颈环扎术的半数有效剂量:一种序贯分配偏倚硬币设计
Anesth Analg. 2022 Apr 1;134(4):834-842. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005927.
4
Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.门诊膝关节镜检查患者中2-氯普鲁卡因、布比卡因和利多卡因用于脊髓麻醉的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):576-83. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000420.
5
Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis.与低剂量脊髓布比卡因相比,氯普鲁卡因的脊髓药代动力学特征是否真的在临床结局方面具有临床优势?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
Impact of Baricity on Intrathecal Chloroprocaine Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine.比重对鞘内注射氯普鲁卡因与重比重布比卡因的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Apr 1;134(4):e15. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005715.
7
Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial.门诊手术中鞘内注射1%氯普鲁卡因与0.5%布比卡因的比较:一项前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机对照试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 May;58(5):560-6. doi: 10.1111/aas.12291. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Randomised controlled trial of spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine or 2-chloroprocaine during caesarean section.剖宫产术中布比卡因或2-氯普鲁卡因腰麻的随机对照试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 May;60(5):642-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12665. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
9
Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.影响日间手术患者选择椎管内麻醉或全身麻醉的因素:一项多中心观察性研究的结果。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):527-540. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01171-6. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Comparison of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Bupivacaine in Short Gynecological Procedures: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.鞘内注射氯普鲁卡因与布比卡因用于短小妇科手术的比较:一项随机双盲研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):e44187. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44187. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Anaesthesia for cervical cerclage.宫颈环扎术的麻醉
BJA Educ. 2025 Mar;25(3):87-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Dec 31.