• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊手术中鞘内注射1%氯普鲁卡因与0.5%布比卡因的比较:一项前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机对照试验。

Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial.

作者信息

Camponovo C, Wulf H, Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Riva T, Cristina D, Vassiliou T, Leschka K, Fanelli G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 May;58(5):560-6. doi: 10.1111/aas.12291. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/aas.12291
PMID:24601887
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, multicentre study aimed at determining the non-inferiority of 50 mg of plain 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 10 mg of 0.5% plain bupivacaine in terms of sensory block onset time at T10 after spinal injection. The study hypothesis was that the difference in onset times of sensory block to T10 between the two drugs is ≤ 4 min.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty patients undergoing lower abdominal or lower limb procedures (≤ 40 min) were randomised to receive one of two treatments: 50 mg of plain 1% 2-chloroprocaine (Group C, n = 66) or 10 mg of plain 0.5% bupivacaine (Group B, n = 64). Times to sensory and motor block onsets, maximum sensory block level, readiness for surgery, regression of sensory and motor blocks, first analgesic requirements, unassisted ambulation, home discharge, and side effects after 24 h and 7 days were registered blindly.

RESULTS

Chloroprocaine was comparable with plain 0.5% bupivacaine in terms of time to sensory block at T10 level. Group C showed faster onsets of motor block (5 vs. 6 min), maximum sensory block level (8.5 vs. 14 min), resolution of sensory (105 vs. 225 min) and motor (100 vs. 210 min) blocks, unassisted ambulation (142.5 vs. 290.5 min), first analgesic requirement (120 vs. 293.5 min), and home discharge (150 vs. 325 min) (all comparisons, P < 0.05). No chloroprocaine patient developed transient neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Spinal anaesthesia with 50 mg of plain 1% 2-chloroprocaine is similar to 10 mg of plain 0.5% bupivacaine in terms of onset of sensory block at T10 but shows quicker recovery from anaesthesia than with 0.5% bupivacaine.

摘要

背景

这项前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机、多中心研究旨在确定50毫克普通1% 2 - 氯普鲁卡因与10毫克0.5%普通布比卡因在脊髓注射后T10水平感觉阻滞起效时间方面的非劣效性。研究假设是两种药物至T10感觉阻滞起效时间的差异≤4分钟。

方法

130例接受下腹部或下肢手术(≤40分钟)的患者被随机分配接受两种治疗之一:50毫克普通1% 2 - 氯普鲁卡因(C组,n = 66)或10毫克普通0.5%布比卡因(B组,n = 64)。盲目记录感觉和运动阻滞起效时间、最大感觉阻滞平面、手术准备情况、感觉和运动阻滞消退情况、首次镇痛需求、自主行走情况、出院回家情况以及24小时和7天后的副作用。

结果

在T10水平感觉阻滞时间方面,氯普鲁卡因与普通0.5%布比卡因相当。C组运动阻滞起效更快(5分钟对6分钟)、最大感觉阻滞平面出现更快(8.5分钟对14分钟)、感觉(105分钟对225分钟)和运动(100分钟对210分钟)阻滞消退更快、自主行走更快(142.5分钟对290.5分钟)、首次镇痛需求出现更晚(120分钟对293.5分钟)以及出院回家更早(150分钟对325分钟)(所有比较,P < 0.05)。没有氯普鲁卡因患者出现短暂性神经症状。

结论

50毫克普通1% 2 - 氯普鲁卡因脊髓麻醉在T10感觉阻滞起效方面与10毫克普通0.5%布比卡因相似,但比0.5%布比卡因麻醉恢复更快。

相似文献

1
Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial.门诊手术中鞘内注射1%氯普鲁卡因与0.5%布比卡因的比较:一项前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机对照试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 May;58(5):560-6. doi: 10.1111/aas.12291. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
2
Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative-free 2-chlorprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison.利多卡因或无防腐剂的2-氯普鲁卡因用于门诊膝关节镜检查的脊髓麻醉:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲比较研究。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Apr;104(4):959-64. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000258766.73612.d8.
3
Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.门诊膝关节镜检查患者中2-氯普鲁卡因、布比卡因和利多卡因用于脊髓麻醉的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):576-83. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000420.
4
A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、临床试验比较了 40mg 和 60mg 高压 2%丙泊酚与 60mg 普通 2%丙泊酚用于门诊手术椎管内麻醉的疗效。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):568-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e30bb8. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
5
Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.鞘内注射3% 2-氯普鲁卡因与0.75%重比重布比卡因用于宫颈环扎术的双盲随机对照试验
Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653.
6
Chloroprocaine 40 mg produces shorter spinal block than articaine 40 mg in day-case knee arthroscopy patients.氯普鲁卡因 40mg 用于日间膝关节镜检查患者时产生的脊髓阻滞短于 40mg 阿替卡因。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):911-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12107. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
7
Spinal anaesthesia with articaine 5% vs bupivacaine 0.5% for day-case lower limb surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.用于日间下肢手术的 5% 阿替卡因与 0.5% 布比卡因脊髓麻醉:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):104-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem332.
8
Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis.与低剂量脊髓布比卡因相比,氯普鲁卡因的脊髓药代动力学特征是否真的在临床结局方面具有临床优势?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Randomised comparison of hyperbaric articaine and hyperbaric low-dose bupivacaine along with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia for day-case inguinal herniorrhaphy.在日间腹股沟疝修补术中,比较布比卡因高比重与低比重联合芬太尼用于蛛网膜下腔麻醉的随机对照研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jan;29(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a11be.
10
Intrathecal chloroprocaine vs. lidocaine in day-case surgery: recovery, discharge and effect of pre-hydration on micturition.日间手术中鞘内注射氯普鲁卡因与利多卡因的比较:恢复情况、出院情况及术前补液对排尿的影响
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Feb;58(2):206-13. doi: 10.1111/aas.12247.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective comparison of chloroprocaine and mepivacaine in spinal anesthesia for same-day discharge TKA.氯普鲁卡因与甲哌卡因用于当日出院全膝关节置换术脊髓麻醉的回顾性比较
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025 Aug 7;37(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s43019-025-00283-4.
2
Optimal local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory non-arthroplasty surgery: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.门诊非关节置换手术患者脊髓麻醉的最佳局部麻醉药:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;72(4):550-566. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02924-4. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
3
Impact of Short-Acting Spinal Anesthetic on Discharge from Postanesthetic Care Unit: A Retrospective Analysis.
短效脊髓麻醉对麻醉后恢复室出院的影响:一项回顾性分析。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2025 Mar 12;78(1):e3618. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3618. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 1% Chloroprocaine Vis-a-vis 2% Lignocaine with Adrenaline (1:80,000) in Third Molar Surgery.1%氯普鲁卡因与含肾上腺素(1:80,000)的2%利多卡因在第三磨牙手术中麻醉效果的比较评估。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Oct;23(5):1261-1266. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01989-2. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
5
Comparison of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Bupivacaine in Short Gynecological Procedures: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.鞘内注射氯普鲁卡因与布比卡因用于短小妇科手术的比较:一项随机双盲研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):e44187. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44187. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing 2-Chloroprocaine and Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Gynecological Surgeries.比较2-氯普鲁卡因和布比卡因用于妇科手术脊髓麻醉的随机对照研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):12-16. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_20_22. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Who Received Spinal Chloroprocaine for Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty-Consecutive Case Series Study.接受脊髓氯普鲁卡因用于全髋关节或膝关节置换术患者的围手术期结局——连续病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 29;11(19):5771. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195771.
8
Comparison of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric chloroprocaine and general anaesthesia for short duration ambulatory urological procedures.等比重氯普鲁卡因脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉用于短期门诊泌尿外科手术的比较。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):91-96. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_131_20. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
A Comparative Study of Isobaric 1% Chloroprocaine With 0.5% Isobaric Bupivacaine for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Study.等比重1%氯普鲁卡因与0.5%等比重布比卡因用于脊髓麻醉下输尿管镜碎石术的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 30;14(4):e24633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24633. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study.一项评估鞘内注射1%氯普鲁卡因和0.5%左旋布比卡因用于肛周手术的研究:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):406-411. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_2_21. Epub 2021 Mar 22.