• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四季皆宜的食物:大猩猩食物偏好跨测试方法和季节的稳定性

A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.

作者信息

Vonk Jennifer, Truax Jordyn, McGuire Molly C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA.

Zoo Miami, Miami, FL 33177, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;12(6):685. doi: 10.3390/ani12060685.

DOI:10.3390/ani12060685
PMID:35327082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944577/
Abstract

Decisions about which foods to use during training and enrichment for captive animals may be based on invalid assumptions about individuals' preferences. It is important to assess the stability of food preferences given that one-time preferences are often used to inform which items are offered over a longer period of time. Presenting preference assessments using images of food items allows control over factors such as size, scent, and inadvertent cueing but requires validation. We presented three male gorillas with choices between randomly selected pairs of actual food items from their morning meal using PVC feeders. We also presented the gorillas with two-alternative forced-choice tests between images of these foods on a touchscreen computer. Ranked preferences were correlated across method and seasons. Furthermore, gorillas selected images of preferred over less preferred foods in a validation task on the touchscreen. However, selections of some food items changed within sessions, suggesting that preference may be relative to other contextual factors. Researchers should assess how choices affect subsequent preferences to understand whether animals demonstrate absolute preferences for particular food items, or prefer variety.

摘要

关于圈养动物训练和丰富活动期间使用哪些食物的决策,可能基于对个体偏好的无效假设。鉴于一次性偏好常被用于确定较长时期内提供哪些食物,评估食物偏好的稳定性很重要。使用食物图片进行偏好评估可以控制诸如大小、气味和无意暗示等因素,但需要进行验证。我们使用PVC喂食器,让三只雄性大猩猩从它们早餐中随机挑选的成对实际食物之间进行选择。我们还在触摸屏电脑上让大猩猩在这些食物的图片之间进行二选一的强制选择测试。不同方法和季节的偏好排名具有相关性。此外,在触摸屏上的验证任务中,大猩猩选择了更喜欢的食物而非不太喜欢的食物的图片。然而,某些食物的选择在各场次中发生了变化,这表明偏好可能与其他情境因素有关。研究人员应评估选择如何影响后续偏好,以了解动物是对特定食物表现出绝对偏好,还是更喜欢多样化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/096ef0bdd652/animals-12-00685-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/5f547bd90bed/animals-12-00685-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/5e894e50a58d/animals-12-00685-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/cfb0b2f48b73/animals-12-00685-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/642be7472cee/animals-12-00685-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/c22a1cc0d357/animals-12-00685-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/096ef0bdd652/animals-12-00685-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/5f547bd90bed/animals-12-00685-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/5e894e50a58d/animals-12-00685-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/cfb0b2f48b73/animals-12-00685-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/642be7472cee/animals-12-00685-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/c22a1cc0d357/animals-12-00685-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24a8/8944577/096ef0bdd652/animals-12-00685-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.四季皆宜的食物:大猩猩食物偏好跨测试方法和季节的稳定性
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;12(6):685. doi: 10.3390/ani12060685.
2
Silence is Golden: Auditory Preferences in Zoo-housed Gorillas.沉默是金:圈养大猩猩的听觉偏好。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;26(3):404-419. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1968400. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Prosocial or photo preferences? Gorillas' prosocial choices using a touchscreen.亲社会还是拍照偏好?大猩猩使用触摸屏做出亲社会选择。
Am J Primatol. 2024 May;86(5):e23612. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23612. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
An assessment of touchscreens for testing primate food preferences and valuations.触屏在灵长类动物食物偏好和价值评估测试中的应用评估
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):639-650. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1065-0.
5
Food preference and nutrient composition in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus).圈养倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)的食物偏好和营养成分。
Primates. 2020 Sep;61(5):661-671. doi: 10.1007/s10329-020-00813-6. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Food preferences of wild mountain gorillas.野生山地大猩猩的食物偏好
Am J Primatol. 2008 Oct;70(10):927-38. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20584.
7
Testing for the "Blues": Using the Modified Emotional Stroop Task to Assess the Emotional Response of Gorillas.检测“忧郁”:使用改良版情绪斯特鲁普任务评估大猩猩的情绪反应
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 6;12(9):1188. doi: 10.3390/ani12091188.
8
What's not to like about Likert? Developing a nonverbal animal preference scale (NAPS).莱克特量表有什么不好?开发一种非言语动物偏好量表(NAPS)。
Am J Primatol. 2022 Oct;84(10):e23364. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23364. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Assessment of test-retest reliability of a food choice task among healthy individuals.健康个体中食物选择任务重测信度的评估。
Appetite. 2018 Apr 1;123:352-356. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Differences in between-reinforcer value modulate the selective-value effect in great apes (Pan troglodytes, P. Paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii).强化物之间的价值差异调节了大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)的选择性价值效应。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Feb;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/com0000014. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Food Inclination of Crab-Eating Macaques in Laboratory Environments: Enhancing Positive Reinforcement Training and Health Optimization.实验室环境中食蟹猕猴的潜在食物偏好:加强正强化训练与健康优化
Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;14(7):1123. doi: 10.3390/ani14071123.
2
Developing a Preference Scale for a Bear: From "Bearly Like" to "Like Beary Much".制定一份针对熊的偏好量表:从“有点喜欢”到“非常喜欢”。
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 6;13(9):1554. doi: 10.3390/ani13091554.
3
Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later.

本文引用的文献

1
What's not to like about Likert? Developing a nonverbal animal preference scale (NAPS).莱克特量表有什么不好?开发一种非言语动物偏好量表(NAPS)。
Am J Primatol. 2022 Oct;84(10):e23364. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23364. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
2
Investigating food preference in zoo-housed meerkats.研究圈养细尾獴的食物偏好。
Zoo Biol. 2021 Nov;40(6):517-526. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21640. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
3
A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice.强化物变化与选择的偏好分析
应用行为分析与动物园:福斯曼和奥格登(1992)三十年后。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):29-54. doi: 10.1002/jaba.969. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
Testing for the "Blues": Using the Modified Emotional Stroop Task to Assess the Emotional Response of Gorillas.检测“忧郁”:使用改良版情绪斯特鲁普任务评估大猩猩的情绪反应
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 6;12(9):1188. doi: 10.3390/ani12091188.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):1062-1074. doi: 10.1002/jaba.835. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Bearing fruit: Piloting a novel judgment bias task in an American black bear.结出硕果:在美国黑熊中试行新型判断偏差任务。
Zoo Biol. 2021 Mar;40(2):89-97. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21584. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?解析黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)斑块利用:个体是否会像边际值定理所预测的那样对食物斑块做出反应?
Am J Primatol. 2020 Dec;82(12):e23208. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23208. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Picture recognition of food by sloth bears (Melursus ursinus).树懒熊(食蚁兽)对食物的图像识别。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Jan;23(1):227-231. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01314-w. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
Social learning of arbitrary food preferences in bonobos.倭黑猩猩对任意食物偏好的社会学习。
Behav Processes. 2019 Oct;167:103912. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103912. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
8
Fruit scent and observer colour vision shape food-selection strategies in wild capuchin monkeys.果香和观察者的色觉塑造了野生卷尾猴的食物选择策略。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 3;10(1):2407. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10250-9.
9
Quantity versus quality: Convergent findings in effort-based choice tasks.数量与质量:基于努力的选择任务中的趋同发现。
Behav Processes. 2019 Jul;164:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 11.
10
Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.食物偏好和强化物有效性的系统评估:圈养恒河猴训练实验室的改进
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.