• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触屏在灵长类动物食物偏好和价值评估测试中的应用评估

An assessment of touchscreens for testing primate food preferences and valuations.

机构信息

Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Urban Wildlife Institute, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):639-650. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1065-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1065-0
PMID:29949070
Abstract

Typically, animals' food preferences are tested manually, which can be both time-consuming and vulnerable to experimenter biases. Given the utility of ascertaining animals' food preferences for research and husbandry protocols, developing a quick, reliable, and flexible paradigm would be valuable for expediting many research protocols. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of using a touchscreen interface to test nonhuman primates' food preferences and valuations, adapting previously validated manual methods. We tested a nonhuman primate subject with four foods (carrot, cucumber, grape, and turnip). Preference testing followed a pairwise forced choice protocol with pairs of food images presented on a touchscreen: The subject was rewarded with whichever food was selected. All six possible pairwise combinations were presented, with 90 trials per pairing. Second, we measured how hard the subject was willing to work to obtain each of the four foods, allowing us to generate demand curves. For this phase, a single image of a food item was presented on the touchscreen that the subject had to select in order to receive the food, and the number of selections required increased following a quarter-log scale, with ten trials per cost level (1, 2, 3, 6, 10, and 18). These methods allowed us to ascertain the subject's relative preferences and valuations of the four foods. The success of this touchscreen protocol for testing the subject's food preferences, from both a practical and a theoretical standpoint, suggests that the protocol should be further validated with other foods with this subject, with other subjects, and with other test items.

摘要

通常,动物的食物偏好是通过手动测试的,这既费时又容易受到实验者偏见的影响。鉴于确定动物的食物偏好对于研究和饲养方案的实用性,开发一种快速、可靠和灵活的范式对于加快许多研究方案将是有价值的。因此,我们评估了使用触摸屏界面测试非人类灵长类动物食物偏好和价值的效果,该方法改编自先前验证过的手动方法。我们用四种食物(胡萝卜、黄瓜、葡萄和萝卜)测试了一只非人类灵长类动物。偏好测试采用了成对的强制选择协议,食物图像在触摸屏上呈现:动物选择的食物会得到奖励。所有六种可能的成对组合都呈现出来,每对组合有 90 次试验。其次,我们测量了动物为获得四种食物中的每一种愿意付出多大的努力,这使我们能够生成需求曲线。在这一阶段,触摸屏上呈现出一种食物的单一图像,动物必须选择该图像才能获得食物,并且选择的次数会按照四分之一对数尺度增加,每个成本水平(1、2、3、6、10 和 18)有 10 次试验。这些方法使我们能够确定动物对四种食物的相对偏好和价值。从实际和理论的角度来看,这种用于测试动物食物偏好的触摸屏协议的成功表明,应该用其他食物、其他动物和其他测试项目来进一步验证该协议。

相似文献

1
An assessment of touchscreens for testing primate food preferences and valuations.触屏在灵长类动物食物偏好和价值评估测试中的应用评估
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):639-650. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1065-0.
2
A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.四季皆宜的食物:大猩猩食物偏好跨测试方法和季节的稳定性
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;12(6):685. doi: 10.3390/ani12060685.
3
Testing three primate species' attentional biases toward preferred and unpreferred foods: Seeing red or high valued food?测试三种灵长类动物对偏好和非偏好食物的注意力偏向:看到红色或高价值食物?
J Comp Psychol. 2024 Aug;138(3):177-189. doi: 10.1037/com0000375. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Food preference, keeper ratings, and reinforcer effectiveness in exotic animals: the value of systematic testing.外来动物的食物偏好、饲养员评分及强化物有效性:系统测试的价值
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2011;14(1):33-41. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2011.527602.
5
Scaling reward value with demand curves versus preference tests.通过需求曲线与偏好测试来衡量奖励价值。
Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):631-41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0967-4. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
The interplay between individual, social, and environmental influences on chimpanzee food choices.个体、社会和环境因素对黑猩猩食物选择的相互作用。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jun;105:71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
7
A novel cognitive palatability assessment protocol for dogs.一种针对犬类的新型认知适口性评估方案。
J Anim Sci. 2004 Jul;82(7):2200-6. doi: 10.2527/2004.8272200x.
8
Preferences towards novel foods in Cebus apella: the role of nutrients and social influences.卷尾猴对新食物的偏好:营养物质和社会影响的作用。
Physiol Behav. 2003 Nov;80(2-3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.08.004.
9
Preferences for nutrients and sensory food qualities identify biological sources of economic values in monkeys.对营养物质和感官食物质量的偏好确定了猴子的经济价值的生物学来源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 29;118(26). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101954118.
10
Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals.四只黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)对延迟满足的维持:延迟奖励可见性、实验者在场及延长延迟间隔的影响
Behav Processes. 2006 Nov 1;73(3):315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Touchscreen Tasks for Cognitive Testing in Domestic Goats (): A Pilot Study Using Odd-Item Search Training.家山羊认知测试的触屏任务():一项使用奇数项搜索训练的初步研究
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;15(14):2115. doi: 10.3390/ani15142115.
2
Animal Welfare, Agency, and Animal-Computer Interaction.动物福利、能动性与动物-计算机交互
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 15;15(2):219. doi: 10.3390/ani15020219.
3
Developing a Preference Scale for a Bear: From "Bearly Like" to "Like Beary Much".制定一份针对熊的偏好量表:从“有点喜欢”到“非常喜欢”。
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 6;13(9):1554. doi: 10.3390/ani13091554.
4
Rating enrichment items by female group-housed laboratory mice in multiple binary choice tests using an RFID-based tracking system.使用基于 RFID 的跟踪系统对雌性群居实验室小鼠进行多项二选一测试,对富集物进行评分。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0278709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278709. eCollection 2023.
5
Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later.应用行为分析与动物园:福斯曼和奥格登(1992)三十年后。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):29-54. doi: 10.1002/jaba.969. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Survey on the Past Decade of Technology in Animal Enrichment: A Scoping Review.动物环境丰容技术十年回顾:一项范围综述
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 13;12(14):1792. doi: 10.3390/ani12141792.
7
Apex and ApeTouch: Development of a Portable Touchscreen System and Software for Primates at Zoos.顶点与猿类触摸:为动物园灵长类动物开发的便携式触摸屏系统及软件
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;12(13):1660. doi: 10.3390/ani12131660.
8
Testing for the "Blues": Using the Modified Emotional Stroop Task to Assess the Emotional Response of Gorillas.检测“忧郁”:使用改良版情绪斯特鲁普任务评估大猩猩的情绪反应
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 6;12(9):1188. doi: 10.3390/ani12091188.
9
A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.四季皆宜的食物:大猩猩食物偏好跨测试方法和季节的稳定性
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;12(6):685. doi: 10.3390/ani12060685.
10
Bayesian paired comparison with the bpcs package.贝叶斯配对比较与 bps 包。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):2025-2045. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01714-2. Epub 2021 Nov 30.