• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测“忧郁”:使用改良版情绪斯特鲁普任务评估大猩猩的情绪反应

Testing for the "Blues": Using the Modified Emotional Stroop Task to Assess the Emotional Response of Gorillas.

作者信息

Vonk Jennifer, McGuire Molly, Leete Jessica

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA.

Zoo Miami, Miami, FL 33177, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 May 6;12(9):1188. doi: 10.3390/ani12091188.

DOI:10.3390/ani12091188
PMID:35565614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9102210/
Abstract

We adapted the emotional Stroop task developed for primates to test whether gorillas would show response slowing for images of 'negative' compared to images of 'positive' items placed within previously reinforced borders. Three zoo-housed male gorillas participated in six phases of an emotional Stroop paradigm. In Phase One, they learned to select blue borders over yellow borders in a forced choice task presented on the touchscreen. In Phase Two, neutral yellow or blue two-dimensional shapes were placed within the borders. On congruent trials, blue images were presented within both blue and yellow borders. On incongruent trials, yellow images were placed within both blue and yellow borders. We continued to use these trials as control trials in subsequent phases. We predicted that response latencies would be slower and accuracy would be lower on incongruent trials. Although the gorillas responded more quickly to incongruent trials, in contrast to predictions, they were more accurate on congruent trials, consistent with predictions. Therefore, we proceeded with Phase Three in which photographs of images assumed to have positive and negative valences for the gorillas were placed within the borders. On test trials, the same positive or negative image was placed within both borders. In Phase Four, a positive image was paired with a negative image on each trial and the positive image appeared in either the blue (congruent trials) or yellow border (incongruent trials). Phases Five and Six replicated Phases Three and Four with images of novel positive and negative items. The gorillas responded more quickly on congruent trials compared to incongruent trials on test trials but not on control trials throughout Phases 3-6. These findings provide some validation for the emotional Stroop task to test attentional shift with emotionally valenced items.

摘要

我们改编了为灵长类动物开发的情绪斯特鲁普任务,以测试大猩猩在先前强化边框内放置的“负面”图像与“正面”图像相比,是否会出现反应减慢的情况。三只圈养在动物园的雄性大猩猩参与了情绪斯特鲁普范式的六个阶段。在第一阶段,它们在触摸屏上呈现的强制选择任务中学会选择蓝色边框而非黄色边框。在第二阶段,中性的黄色或蓝色二维形状被放置在边框内。在一致试验中,蓝色图像呈现在蓝色和黄色边框内。在不一致试验中,黄色图像被放置在蓝色和黄色边框内。在后续阶段,我们继续将这些试验用作对照试验。我们预测在不一致试验中反应潜伏期会更长,准确率会更低。尽管大猩猩对不一致试验的反应更快,但与预测相反的是,它们在一致试验中更准确,这与预测一致。因此,我们进入第三阶段,在边框内放置据信对大猩猩具有正价和负价的图像照片。在测试试验中,相同的正性或负性图像被放置在两个边框内。在第四阶段,每次试验将一个正性图像与一个负性图像配对,正性图像出现在蓝色边框(一致试验)或黄色边框(不一致试验)中。第五阶段和第六阶段用新的正性和负性项目的图像重复第三阶段和第四阶段。在整个第3至6阶段的测试试验中,与不一致试验相比,大猩猩在一致试验中的反应更快,但在对照试验中并非如此。这些发现为情绪斯特鲁普任务用于测试对具有情绪效价项目的注意力转移提供了一些验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/4c826a37f9c4/animals-12-01188-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/ef6e8f075d95/animals-12-01188-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/2f1db49c03bd/animals-12-01188-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/ea0dc0605255/animals-12-01188-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/0105f59ac9aa/animals-12-01188-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/ff939d3ebfda/animals-12-01188-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/84bd0a3daf73/animals-12-01188-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/e36b71f0e507/animals-12-01188-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/4c826a37f9c4/animals-12-01188-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/ef6e8f075d95/animals-12-01188-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/2f1db49c03bd/animals-12-01188-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/ea0dc0605255/animals-12-01188-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/0105f59ac9aa/animals-12-01188-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/ff939d3ebfda/animals-12-01188-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/84bd0a3daf73/animals-12-01188-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/e36b71f0e507/animals-12-01188-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548a/9102210/4c826a37f9c4/animals-12-01188-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing for the "Blues": Using the Modified Emotional Stroop Task to Assess the Emotional Response of Gorillas.检测“忧郁”:使用改良版情绪斯特鲁普任务评估大猩猩的情绪反应
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 6;12(9):1188. doi: 10.3390/ani12091188.
2
A Comparative Perspective on Three Primate Species' Responses to a Pictorial Emotional Stroop Task.三种灵长类动物对图片情绪斯特鲁普任务反应的比较视角
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;11(3):588. doi: 10.3390/ani11030588.
3
How chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perform in a modified emotional Stroop task.黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)在改良版情绪Stroop任务中的表现。
Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):435-49. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0944-3. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
4
Social and nonsocial stimuli alter the performance of bonobos during a pictorial emotional Stroop task.社交和非社交刺激会改变倭黑猩猩在图片情绪Stroop任务中的表现。
Am J Primatol. 2022 Feb;84(2):e23356. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23356. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.在埃里克森任务和斯特鲁普任务表现中,注意力控制调整可以独立于反应冲突。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1056-81. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.523792. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
6
In or out: Response slowing across housing conditions as a measure of affect in three Western lowland gorillas ().进或出:作为三只西部低地大猩猩情感衡量指标的不同居住条件下的反应迟缓 ()。 需注意,原文括号处内容缺失,翻译可能会稍有不完整之感。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 10;8:e9525. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9525. eCollection 2020.
7
Brain Functional Mechanisms in Attentional Processing Following Modified Conflict Stroop Task.改良冲突Stroop任务后注意加工中的脑功能机制
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020 Aug 1;10(4):493-506. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2003-1084. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Gorillas' use of the escape response in object choice memory tests.大猩猩在物体选择记忆测试中使用逃避反应。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Jan;16(1):65-84. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
9
Verbal and facial-emotional Stroop tasks reveal specific attentional interferences in sad mood.言语和面部表情 Stroop 任务揭示了悲伤情绪中的特定注意力干扰。
Brain Behav. 2012 Jan;2(1):74-83. doi: 10.1002/brb3.38.
10
An ERP investigation of the working memory stroop effect.ERP 研究工作记忆斯特鲁普效应。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Feb 12;152:107752. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107752. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the Camera Trap: A Systematic Review of Computing Technology Used to Monitor and Interact with (More) Varied Taxa in Zoos and Aquariums.超越相机陷阱:对动物园和水族馆中用于监测和与(更多)不同生物分类群互动的计算技术的系统综述。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;15(12):1721. doi: 10.3390/ani15121721.
2
Apex and ApeTouch: Development of a Portable Touchscreen System and Software for Primates at Zoos.顶点与猿类触摸:为动物园灵长类动物开发的便携式触摸屏系统及软件
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;12(13):1660. doi: 10.3390/ani12131660.

本文引用的文献

1
My Fear Is Not, and Never Will Be, Your Fear: On Emotions and Feelings in Animals.我的恐惧不是,也永远不会是你的恐惧:论动物的情感与感觉。
Affect Sci. 2022 Mar 10;3(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00099-x. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
A Food for All Seasons: Stability of Food Preferences in Gorillas across Testing Methods and Seasons.四季皆宜的食物:大猩猩食物偏好跨测试方法和季节的稳定性
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;12(6):685. doi: 10.3390/ani12060685.
3
What's not to like about Likert? Developing a nonverbal animal preference scale (NAPS).
莱克特量表有什么不好?开发一种非言语动物偏好量表(NAPS)。
Am J Primatol. 2022 Oct;84(10):e23364. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23364. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
Social and nonsocial stimuli alter the performance of bonobos during a pictorial emotional Stroop task.社交和非社交刺激会改变倭黑猩猩在图片情绪Stroop任务中的表现。
Am J Primatol. 2022 Feb;84(2):e23356. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23356. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
The Dot-Probe Attention Bias Task as a Method to Assess Psychological Well-Being after Anesthesia: A Study with Adult Female Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis).点探测注意偏向任务作为评估麻醉后心理幸福感的方法:对成年雌性长尾猕猴(Macaca fascicularis)的研究。
Eur Surg Res. 2023;64(1):37-53. doi: 10.1159/000521440. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
6
Silence is Golden: Auditory Preferences in Zoo-housed Gorillas.沉默是金:圈养大猩猩的听觉偏好。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;26(3):404-419. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1968400. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
A Comparative Perspective on Three Primate Species' Responses to a Pictorial Emotional Stroop Task.三种灵长类动物对图片情绪斯特鲁普任务反应的比较视角
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;11(3):588. doi: 10.3390/ani11030588.
8
In or out: Response slowing across housing conditions as a measure of affect in three Western lowland gorillas ().进或出:作为三只西部低地大猩猩情感衡量指标的不同居住条件下的反应迟缓 ()。 需注意,原文括号处内容缺失,翻译可能会稍有不完整之感。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 10;8:e9525. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9525. eCollection 2020.
9
Toward a Standardized Test of Fearful Temperament in Primates: A Sensitive Alternative to the Human Intruder Task for Laboratory-Housed Rhesus Macaques ().迈向灵长类动物恐惧性情的标准化测试:一种适用于圈养恒河猴的、比人类入侵者任务更灵敏的替代方法()
Front Psychol. 2019 May 14;10:1051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01051. eCollection 2019.
10
Preferential attentional engagement drives attentional bias to snakes in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) and humans (Homo sapiens).优先注意的参与驱动了日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)和人类(Homo sapiens)对蛇的注意偏向。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 11;8(1):17773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36108-6.