• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续性非卧床腹膜透析和中心血液透析患者的住院和门诊医疗保险允许收费比较:一项单中心研究。

A comparison of inpatient and outpatient Medicare allowable charges for continuous ambulatory peritoneal and center hemodialysis patients: a single-center study.

作者信息

Prowant B F, Kappel D F, Campbell A

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1986 Oct;8(4):248-52. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(86)80034-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0272-6386(86)80034-8
PMID:3532772
Abstract

Medicare allowable charges were compared between 21 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 25 center hemodialysis (CHD) patients for the 12-month period from Sept 1982 through Aug 1983 to determine if savings from CAPD therapy were offset by higher hospitalization charges. All adult patients on a single therapy for the 12-month period who were not dialyzed or hospitalized at other institutions were included. The CAPD and CHD patient groups did not differ significantly by age, sex, or incidence of systemic disease. However, the CHD group had significantly more black patients. The primary renal disease, the incidence of diabetes mellitus, and other systemic diseases did not differ between the groups. The number of hospital admissions was similar between the two groups. However, the CHD patients tended to have a higher number of hospital days than the CAPD group (17.5 v 12.4). Although the total hospital charges tended to be higher for CHD ($16,145) than CAPD patients ($9,872), this difference was not significant. Outpatient dialysis charges were significantly less expensive for CAPD ($16,470) than CHD ($28,233). Emergency department charges were also significantly less for the CAPD group. Charges for patients with and without systemic disease were analyzed separately. In both subgroups, all charges were less for CAPD therapy; however, this difference was significant only for outpatient dialysis charges. Total charges for the 12-month period were significantly less for the CAPD group ($26,453) than for CHD ($45,586). This demonstrates that hospitalization charges did not offset the savings of home dialysis in these patients.

摘要

1982年9月至1983年8月的12个月期间,对21例持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者和25例中心血液透析(CHD)患者的医疗保险允许费用进行了比较,以确定CAPD治疗节省的费用是否被更高的住院费用所抵消。纳入了在这12个月期间接受单一治疗、未在其他机构进行透析或住院的所有成年患者。CAPD组和CHD组在年龄、性别或全身性疾病发病率方面无显著差异。然而,CHD组的黑人患者明显更多。两组之间的原发性肾脏疾病、糖尿病发病率和其他全身性疾病并无差异。两组的住院次数相似。然而,CHD患者的住院天数往往比CAPD组多(17.5天对12.4天)。虽然CHD患者的总住院费用(16,145美元)往往高于CAPD患者(9,872美元),但这种差异并不显著。CAPD的门诊透析费用(16,470美元)明显低于CHD(28,233美元)。CAPD组的急诊科费用也明显更低。对有和没有全身性疾病的患者费用分别进行了分析。在两个亚组中,CAPD治疗的所有费用都更低;然而,这种差异仅在门诊透析费用方面显著。CAPD组12个月期间的总费用(26,453美元)明显低于CHD组(45,586美元)。这表明住院费用并未抵消这些患者家庭透析节省的费用。

相似文献

1
A comparison of inpatient and outpatient Medicare allowable charges for continuous ambulatory peritoneal and center hemodialysis patients: a single-center study.持续性非卧床腹膜透析和中心血液透析患者的住院和门诊医疗保险允许收费比较:一项单中心研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1986 Oct;8(4):248-52. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(86)80034-8.
2
A comparison of charges for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and center hemodialysis.持续性非卧床腹膜透析与中心血液透析费用的比较。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(9):817-24. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90097-2.
3
Reducing a peritoneal dialysis program's cost by changing from a vendor-provided to a program-provided system for general medical supplies: significant savings in CCPD.通过将一般医疗用品从供应商提供的系统改为项目自行提供的系统来降低腹膜透析项目的成本:持续非卧床腹膜透析可实现显著节约。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Apr;31(4):662-5. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9531183.
4
Comparison of cost-utility between automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.自动化腹膜透析与持续不卧床腹膜透析的成本-效用比较。
Arch Med Res. 2013 Nov;44(8):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
5
The proposed reimbursement regulation.拟议的报销规定。
Nephrol Nurse. 1982 May-Jun;4(3):12-6.
6
Impact of capitation on free-standing dialysis facilities: can you survive?按人头付费对独立透析机构的影响:你能生存下去吗?
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Oct;30(4):542-8. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90314-0.
7
Home dialysis costs less than outpatient dialysis.
N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 18;306(7):431. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202183060720.
8
Economic evaluation of centre haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Ministry of Health hospitals, Malaysia.马来西亚卫生部医院中心血液透析与持续性非卧床腹膜透析的经济学评估
Nephrology (Carlton). 2005 Feb;10(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00360.x.
9
Practice patterns, case mix, Medicare payment policy, and dialysis facility costs.实践模式、病例组合、医疗保险支付政策和透析设施成本。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1567-92.
10
The Medicare cost of renal dialysis. Evidence from a statistical cost function.肾透析的医疗保险费用。来自统计成本函数的证据。
Med Care. 1992 Oct;30(10):879-91. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199210000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial effect of clinical decisions: case study of a dialysis center.
J Med Syst. 1995 Dec;19(6):465-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02260850.