Balas E A, Hicks L L, Stone J V, Ponferrada L P, West D A
School of Medicine and School of Business and Public Administration, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
J Med Syst. 1995 Dec;19(6):465-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02260850.
The purpose of this study was to specify the financial effect of clinical decisions in a dialysis center. A consecutive sample of 14,343 outpatient hemodialysis treatments (OHD), 16,111 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and 4,513 chronic cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) days of treatment was analyzed. An activity-based cost calculation method was applied to the analysis of alternative treatments (service bundles). The weekly cost of OHD was higher ($338 versus $241/$242), and the contribution margin (reimbursement minus total cost) of CAPD/CCPD was much greater ($.48 versus $148/$147 per patient week). Clinical decision-making had an influence on less than 6.8% of OHD and 45.4%/46.6% of CAPD/CCPD related expenses. In comparison to activity-based cost calculation, conventional methods overestimated the overhead expense of CAPD by 3-48%. This study documented that most cost control opportunities reside in the usual process of care and less can be influenced by a direct interference with the patient-physician contacts. Paying for 1 week of renal replacement (capitation) could simplify the process of reimbursement and cost tracking.
