Dos Santos Gustavo Quadra Vieira, Kaneko Jun'ichi, Abe Takeyuki
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, 255, Saitama 338-8570, Japan.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;15(6):2190. doi: 10.3390/ma15062190.
This research presents an analysis of the effects of different cutting angles on the side milling of Inconel 718 products manufactured with the Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) technique. Considering that this manufacturing technology can build near-net shape products, its surface quality is deemed unqualified as a final product, requiring a post-processing step. In this paper, three different angles-0°, 35°, and 90-are compared, looking for possible differences regarding its machinability. As the alloy in question is a material known for being difficult to machine, and the samples were produced with the additive manufacturing technique that created peculiar characteristics, it was deemed necessary to analyze different aspects of the machining process: the surface quality, tool wear, and cutting forces for all three cases, and to rank the angles regarding these results. With analog experiments with the same alloy but cold-rolled, it was possible to infer that not only is the 0-degree angle is the best option for milling, but the anisotropy of the WAAM samples could be the major source of the differences in the milling results.
本研究分析了不同切削角度对采用电弧增材制造(WAAM)技术制造的Inconel 718产品侧铣加工的影响。考虑到这种制造技术能够制造近净形产品,但其表面质量作为最终产品被认为不合格,需要进行后处理步骤。在本文中,比较了三种不同的角度——0°、35°和90°,以寻找其可加工性方面可能存在的差异。由于所讨论的合金是一种已知难加工的材料,且样品是采用增材制造技术生产的,具有独特的特性,因此有必要分析加工过程的不同方面:三种情况下的表面质量、刀具磨损和切削力,并根据这些结果对角度进行排序。通过对相同合金但冷轧的模拟实验,可以推断出,不仅0°角是铣削的最佳选择,而且WAAM样品的各向异性可能是铣削结果差异的主要来源。