Jaworski Łukasz, Zabrzyńska Maria, Klimaszewska-Wiśniewska Anna, Zielińska Wioletta, Grzanka Dariusz, Gagat Maciej
Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Private Center of Surgery, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 13;11(6):1572. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061572.
Tendinopathy is a process of chaotic extracellular matrix remodeling followed by increased secretion of enzymes and mediators of inflammation. The histopathological assessment of tendinous tissue is crucial to formulate the diagnosis and establish the severity of tendon degeneration. Nevertheless, the microscopic analysis of tendinous tissue features is often challenging. In this review, we aimed to compare the most popular scales used in tendon pathology assessment and reevaluate the role of the neovascularization process. The following scores were evaluated: the Bonar score, the Movin score, the Astrom and Rausing Score, and the Soslowsky score. Moreover, the role of neovascularization in tendon degeneration was reassessed. The Bonar system is the most commonly used in tendon pathology. According to the literature, hematoxylin and eosin with additional Alcian Blue staining seems to provide satisfactory results. Furthermore, two observers experienced in musculoskeletal pathology are sufficient for tendinopathy microscopic evaluation. The control, due to similar and typical alterations in tendinous tissue, is not necessary. Neovascularization plays an ambiguous role in tendon disorders. The neovascularization process is crucial in the tendon healing process. On the other hand, it is also an important component of the degeneration of tendinous tissue when the regeneration is incomplete and insufficient. The microscopic analysis of tendinous tissue features is often challenging. The assessment of tendinous tissue using the Bonar system is the most universal. The neovascularization variable in tendinopathy scoring systems should be reconsidered due to discrepancies in studies.
肌腱病是一个细胞外基质重塑紊乱的过程,随后炎症酶和介质的分泌增加。肌腱组织的组织病理学评估对于做出诊断和确定肌腱退变的严重程度至关重要。然而,对肌腱组织特征进行微观分析往往具有挑战性。在本综述中,我们旨在比较肌腱病理学评估中最常用的评分系统,并重新评估新生血管形成过程的作用。评估了以下评分:博纳尔评分、莫文评分、阿斯特罗姆和劳辛评分以及索斯洛斯基评分。此外,还重新评估了新生血管形成在肌腱退变中的作用。博纳尔系统是肌腱病理学中最常用的。根据文献,苏木精和伊红染色加阿尔辛蓝染色似乎能提供令人满意的结果。此外,两名有肌肉骨骼病理学经验的观察者足以进行肌腱病的微观评估。由于肌腱组织的改变相似且典型,对照并非必要。新生血管形成在肌腱疾病中作用不明确。新生血管形成过程在肌腱愈合过程中至关重要。另一方面,当再生不完全且不足时,它也是肌腱组织退变的一个重要组成部分。对肌腱组织特征进行微观分析往往具有挑战性。使用博纳尔系统对肌腱组织进行评估最为普遍。由于研究存在差异,肌腱病评分系统中的新生血管形成变量应重新考虑。