Suppr超能文献

聚焦式与聚焦加放射状联合体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧肘肌腱病:一项回顾性研究

Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Delia Caterina, Santilli Gabriele, Colonna Vincenzo, Di Stasi Valerio, Latini Eleonora, Ciccarelli Antonello, Taurone Samanta, Franchitto Antonio, Santoboni Flavia, Trischitta Donatella, Nusca Sveva Maria, Vetrano Mario, Vulpiani Maria Chiara

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.

Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", 00135 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Oct 22;9(4):201. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040201.

Abstract

Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and degeneration of the common extensor tendon. Despite various treatments, optimal management remains debated. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of focal extracorporeal shockwave therapy (F-ESWT) alone versus a combination of focal and radial pressure waves (F-ESWT+R-PW) in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis. This retrospective observational study included 45 patients diagnosed with chronic lateral epicondylitis divided into two groups based on the treatment received: group A (F-ESWT, n = 23) and group B (F-ESWT+R-PW, n = 22). Both groups underwent three weekly sessions of their respective treatments. Patients were also given a home exercise protocol. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for pain and functional impairment at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 24 weeks (T3) post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included grip strength and ultrasonographic measurements of common extensor tendon (CET) thickness and vascularization. Significant improvements in VAS and PRTEE scores were observed in both groups at all follow-up points. Group B showed greater pain reduction at T1 (VAS: 3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 4.43 ± 1.47; < 0.005) and T2 (VAS: < 0.030) compared to group A. Functional outcomes (PRTEE) also favored group B at T1 ( < 0.030) and in the pain section at T2 ( < 0.020). Grip strength improved similarly in both groups. CET thickness showed no significant differences at T3. Vascularization decreased significantly in both groups, with a non-significant trend favoring group B. The combined F-ESWT+R-PW therapy proved more effective than F-ESWT alone in the short- to mid-term management of chronic lateral epicondylitis, significantly enhancing pain reduction and functional outcomes. The combination of focal and radial pressure waves offers a superior therapeutic approach, leveraging the distinct mechanisms of each modality for better clinical results. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and establish long-term efficacy.

摘要

肘部外侧上髁炎,俗称网球肘,是一种肌肉骨骼疾病,其特征为伸肌总腱疼痛和退变。尽管有多种治疗方法,但最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较单纯聚焦式体外冲击波疗法(F-ESWT)与聚焦式和径向压力波联合疗法(F-ESWT+R-PW)治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的效果。这项回顾性观察研究纳入了45例被诊断为慢性外侧上髁炎的患者,根据接受的治疗分为两组:A组(F-ESWT,n = 23)和B组(F-ESWT+R-PW,n = 22)。两组均每周接受三次各自的治疗。患者还被给予家庭锻炼方案。主要结局指标在基线(T0)、治疗后4周(T1)、12周(T2)和24周(T3)时,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛情况,并使用患者自评网球肘评估量表(PRTEE)评估疼痛和功能障碍情况。次要结局指标包括握力以及伸肌总腱(CET)厚度和血管化的超声测量。在所有随访点,两组的VAS和PRTEE评分均有显著改善。与A组相比,B组在T1时疼痛减轻更明显(VAS:3.0±1.6 vs. 4.43±1.47;<0.005),在T2时也更明显(VAS:<0.030)。功能结局(PRTEE)在T1时也更有利于B组(<0.030),在T2时疼痛部分同样如此(<0.020)。两组握力改善情况相似。CET厚度在T3时无显著差异。两组血管化均显著降低,且有不显著的趋势表明B组更优。在慢性外侧上髁炎的短期至中期治疗中,F-ESWT+R-PW联合疗法被证明比单纯F-ESWT更有效,能显著增强疼痛缓解和功能结局。聚焦式和径向压力波联合疗法提供了一种更优的治疗方法,利用了每种方式的独特机制以获得更好的临床效果。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现并确定长期疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78d7/11503328/3bf20a8e1f36/jfmk-09-00201-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验