Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1161-1167. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0759. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison. A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted comparing SURE with basket extraction postlaser lithotripsy. SURE is performed using the CVAC™ Aspiration System, a steerable catheter (with introducer). The safety and feasibility of steering CVAC throughout the collecting system under fluoroscopy and aspirating stone fragments as it was designed to do were evaluated. Fluoroscopy time, change in hemoglobin, adverse events through 30 days, total and proportion of stone volume removed at 1 day, intraoperative stone removal rate, and stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days through CT were compared. Seventeen patients were treated ( = 9 SURE, = 8 Basket). Baseline demographics and stone parameters were not significantly different between groups. One adverse event occurred in each group (self-limiting ileus for SURE and urinary tract infection for Basket). No mucosal injury and no contrast extravasation were observed in either group. The CVAC catheter was steered throughout the collecting system and aspirated fragments. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, change in hemoglobin, or stone removal rate between groups. SURE removed more and a greater proportion of stone volume at day 1 baskets (202 mm 91 mm, < 0.01 and 84% 56%, = 0.022). SURE achieved 100% SFR at 30 days 75% for baskets, although this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.20). This initial study suggests SURE is safe, feasible, and may be more effective in stone removal postlaser lithotripsy compared to basketing. More development is needed, and larger clinical studies are underway.
需要可靠地使尿石症患者完全无石,且发病率最低。我们报告了一项前瞻性研究中使用篮筐提取作为比较的初始安全性和可行性,该研究中使用可控输尿管镜肾排空(SURE)。进行了一项先导随机对照研究,比较了激光碎石术后 SURE 与篮筐提取。SURE 使用 CVAC™ 抽吸系统(可控导管[带引入器])进行。评估了在透视下引导整个收集系统中的 CVAC 并按照设计抽吸结石碎片的安全性和可行性。比较了透视时间、血红蛋白变化、30 天内的不良事件、第 1 天的总结石体积去除量和比例、术中结石清除率以及第 30 天通过 CT 评估的结石清除率(SFR)。17 例患者接受治疗( = 9 例 SURE, = 8 例篮筐)。两组的基线人口统计学和结石参数无显著差异。每组各发生 1 例不良事件(SURE 为自限性肠梗阻,篮筐为尿路感染)。两组均未观察到黏膜损伤和对比外渗。CVAC 导管在整个收集系统中被引导并抽吸碎片。两组之间的透视时间、手术时间、血红蛋白变化或结石清除率均无显著差异。SURE 在第 1 天去除的结石体积更多,比例也更高(篮子为 202 mm 91 mm, < 0.01 和 84% 56%, = 0.022)。SURE 在第 30 天达到 100%的 SFR 篮子为 75%,尽管这一差异无统计学意义( = 0.20)。这项初步研究表明,与篮筐相比,SURE 在激光碎石术后结石清除方面是安全、可行的,并且可能更有效。需要进一步开发,并且更大的临床研究正在进行中。