Suppr超能文献

一种新型小碎片清除系统有望在碎石术期间改善结石取出效果。

A novel small fragment removal system holds promise to improve stone extraction during lithotripsy.

作者信息

Lazarus John, Wellman Mark, John Jeff

机构信息

Division of Urology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Department of Urology, Frere Hospital, Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Jun 9;43(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05711-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel small fragment removal system (SFRS) which is hypothesized to improve kidney stone fragment removal during laser lithotrypsy. The SFRS consists of three parts: a Syphon Ureteric Access Sheath (SUAS), a Dual Action Pump (DAP) and an Agitator. This clinical trial aims to assess the SFRS's impact on intra-renal pressure (IRP) and irrigant flow rate compared to a traditional UAS and its stone fragment removal capabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this prospective single arm seamless Phase 1 and 2 clinical trial. The primary objective of Phase 1 was to evaluate the safety of the SFRS in terms of IRP changes. In Phase 2 we attempted to evaluate the device's efficacy in removing stone fragments. During standard laser lithotripsy, the DAP and Syphon UAS were compared to a conventional UAS in terms of irrigant flow and IRP at baseline and during fluid bolus administration. Additionally, the percentage of stone fragments removed using the SFRS with the Agitator introduced (in place of the fURS) was assessed.

RESULTS

Twelve (n = 12) patients were enrolled. The SFRS showed lower baseline IRP - 20,8 vs. 24,6mmHg for the traditional UAS (p = 0,004). During fluid boluses the IRP was lower for the SFRS at 23,5 vs. 75,2mmHg (p = 0,0002). Greater irrigant flow was seen with the SFRS of 39,2 vs. 34,9mL/min (p = 0.002). Mean pre-op stone volume was 238mm (range 70-562 mm), compared to 1,4mm post-op (range 0-8mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel SFRS holds clinical promise to improve patient safety by reducing IRP with a significant reduction in IRP during fluid bolus administration. It also has the potential to improve visibility via a significant increase in irrigant flow. Lastly, the SFRS was able to remove the overwhelming majority of stone fragments. The main limitation of the study is the small sample size.

摘要

目的

描述一种新型小碎片清除系统(SFRS),据推测该系统可改善激光碎石术中肾结石碎片的清除情况。SFRS由三部分组成:虹吸输尿管通路鞘(SUAS)、双作用泵(DAP)和搅拌器。本临床试验旨在评估与传统输尿管通路鞘相比,SFRS对肾内压(IRP)和冲洗液流速的影响及其结石碎片清除能力。

材料与方法

符合纳入标准的患者参加了这项前瞻性单臂无缝1期和2期临床试验。1期的主要目标是根据IRP变化评估SFRS的安全性。在2期,我们试图评估该设备清除结石碎片的疗效。在标准激光碎石术中,将DAP和虹吸输尿管通路鞘与传统输尿管通路鞘在基线时和推注液体期间的冲洗液流速和IRP方面进行比较。此外,评估了使用引入搅拌器(代替输尿管软镜)的SFRS清除的结石碎片百分比。

结果

共纳入12例患者。SFRS的基线IRP较低,传统输尿管通路鞘为20.8mmHg,而SFRS为24.6mmHg(p = 0.004)。在推注液体期间,SFRS的IRP较低,为23.5mmHg,而传统输尿管通路鞘为75.2mmHg(p = 0.0002)。SFRS的冲洗液流速更高,为39.2mL/min,而传统输尿管通路鞘为34.9mL/min(p = 0.002)。术前结石平均体积为238mm(范围70 - 562mm),术后为1.4mm(范围0 - 8mm)。

结论

新型SFRS有望通过降低IRP来提高患者安全性,在推注液体期间IRP显著降低。它还可能通过显著增加冲洗液流速来提高视野清晰度。最后,SFRS能够清除绝大多数结石碎片。本研究的主要局限性是样本量小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f51e/12149011/0364c4447c87/345_2025_5711_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验