Suppr超能文献

含 VCD 方案与 VRD 方案的诱导治疗对自体造血干细胞移植后多发性骨髓瘤患者结局的影响。

Impact of Induction With VCD Versus VRD on the Outcome of Patients With Multiple Myeloma After an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jun;28(6):307.e1-307.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.020. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

Induction therapy with a triplet regimen, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT), is the standard of care for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib-dexamethasone with cyclophosphamide (VCD) or lenalidomide (VRD) are the most used induction regimens. However, previous studies comparing VCD and VRD showed disparate results. The goal of this retrospective study was to compare the "real-world" results of VCD and VRD in transplant-eligible MM patients outside of a clinical trial. We identified 322 patients who received VRD or VCD induction before auto-HCT at our institution. All patients received melphalan conditioning and single-agent lenalidomide maintenance therapy. Overall, 114 patients received VCD, and 208 received VRD. The median age at auto-HCT was 61.9 years (range 33.9-79.6), with 35.4% (114/322) of the cohort being 65 years of age or older. The overall response rate was 99.7% after auto-HCT, with a significantly lower complete remission rate as the final response in the VCD compared to the VRD group (34% versus 53%; P = .001). However, there was no significant difference between the best response rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better in the VCD compared to the VRD group (92% versus 85%; P = .078). The median duration of ≥VGPR was 50.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.0-69.1) for both cohorts, and there was no difference between VCD and VRD (P = .769; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69-1.31). Median follow-up of survivors was 73 months. There was no difference in the relapse rate between VCD and VRD (P = .749). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.7 months in the VCD and 44.6 months in the VRD group (P = .858). Median overall survival (OS) was 103.8 months with VCD and 101.7 months with VRD (P = .891). At 5 years, the PFS and OS were 38.1% and 76.9% for the VCD group, respectively, and 40.7% and 74.6% for the VRD group, respectively. On multivariate analysis for OS in the entire cohort, Revised International Staging System I and post-auto-HCT best response of stringent complete response (sCR)/CR emerged as significant predictors of superior OS. There was no impact of the type of induction regimen on the OS in the multivariate analysis. Induction therapy with VCD compared to VRD was associated with a lower CR rate, but there was no difference in PFS or OS between the 2 regimens.

摘要

诱导治疗采用三联方案,随后进行大剂量治疗和自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HCT),是新诊断、适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的标准治疗方法。硼替佐米-地塞米松联合环磷酰胺(VCD)或来那度胺(VRD)是最常用的诱导方案。然而,先前比较 VCD 和 VRD 的研究结果存在差异。本回顾性研究的目的是在临床试验之外比较 VCD 和 VRD 在适合移植的 MM 患者中的“真实世界”结果。我们在本机构确定了 322 名在接受自体-HCT 前接受 VRD 或 VCD 诱导的患者。所有患者均接受马法兰预处理和来那度胺单药维持治疗。总体而言,114 名患者接受 VCD,208 名患者接受 VRD。自体-HCT 时的中位年龄为 61.9 岁(范围 33.9-79.6),35.4%(114/322)的患者年龄在 65 岁或以上。自体-HCT 后的总体缓解率为 99.7%,VCD 组的完全缓解率明显低于 VRD 组(34%对 53%;P=0.001)。然而,VCD 组与 VRD 组的最佳缓解率(非常好的部分缓解[VGPR]或更好)之间没有显著差异(92%对 85%;P=0.078)。两组的中位≥VGPR 持续时间均为 50.0 个月(95%置信区间[CI],42.0-69.1),VCD 和 VRD 之间无差异(P=0.769;危险比,0.95;95%CI,0.69-1.31)。幸存者的中位随访时间为 73 个月。VCD 和 VRD 之间的复发率无差异(P=0.749)。VCD 组的无进展生存期(PFS)为 48.7 个月,VRD 组为 44.6 个月(P=0.858)。VCD 组的中位总生存期(OS)为 103.8 个月,VRD 组为 101.7 个月(P=0.891)。在 5 年时,VCD 组的 PFS 和 OS 分别为 38.1%和 76.9%,VRD 组分别为 40.7%和 74.6%。在整个队列的 OS 的多变量分析中,修订后的国际分期系统 I 和自体-HCT 后严格完全缓解(sCR)/CR 的最佳缓解是 OS 良好的显著预测因素。多变量分析中,诱导治疗方案的类型对 OS 没有影响。与 VRD 相比,VCD 诱导治疗与较低的 CR 率相关,但在 PFS 或 OS 方面,两种方案之间没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验