Department of Biological Sciences, Marine Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 24;12(1):5088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09099-8.
Human pressures are pervasive in coastal ecosystems, but their effect magnitudes are masked by methodological limitations. Government lockdowns associated with the global COVID-19 pandemic can address this gap since lockdowns are effectively manipulations of human presence in ecosystems at scales unachievable otherwise. We illustrate this using a study on shorebirds in an urban South African sandy beach ecosystem. Data collected prior to (2019) and during the COVID-19 (2020) pandemic indicated an inverse relationship between shorebird and human numbers, but this was stronger in 2020. In 2020, human exclusion resulted in a six-fold increase in shorebird abundance relative to 2019. Following easing of lockdowns, shorebird abundance declined by 79.6% with a 34.1% increase in human density. Our findings highlight the sensitivity of shorebirds to recreational disturbance, the potential for current methodological approaches to underestimate repercussions of disturbance and the capacity for COVID-19 lockdowns to refine understanding of human-induced stress in ecosystems.
人类压力在沿海生态系统中普遍存在,但由于方法上的限制,其影响程度被掩盖了。全球 COVID-19 大流行期间的政府封锁可以解决这一差距,因为封锁实际上是在其他情况下无法实现的规模上对生态系统中人类存在的操纵。我们使用南非一个城市沙滩生态系统中滨鸟的研究来说明这一点。在 COVID-19 大流行(2020 年)之前和期间(2019 年)收集的数据表明,滨鸟和人类数量之间呈反比关系,但在 2020 年更为明显。2020 年,由于人类被排除在外,滨鸟的数量相对于 2019 年增加了六倍。随着封锁的放松,滨鸟的数量下降了 79.6%,而人类密度增加了 34.1%。我们的研究结果强调了滨鸟对娱乐干扰的敏感性,当前方法可能低估干扰影响的潜力,以及 COVID-19 封锁对完善理解生态系统中人类引起的压力的能力。