Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Department of Clinical Translational Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Apr;28(4):390-400. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.390.
Ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib have shown improvements in efficacy and safety over conventional chemoimmunotherapy in refractory or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL). To evaluate the comparative cost-effectiveness of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs) and estimate the expected value of (partial) perfect information (EV[P]PI) in terms of net health benefits (NHBs) and net monetary benefits (NMBs) forgone. Using a two-state Markov model (progression-free; progression or death), we estimated in base-case and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) the incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) and cost-utility ratios (ICUR) of, respectively, progression-free survival (PFS) life-years (PFLYs) and PFS quality-adjusted LY (PFQALY) gained (g) against 3-year and 5-year time horizons. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/PFQALY was used to assess the probability of being cost-effective in the PSA. EVPI was calculated from the respective NHBs and NMBs. Compared with ibrutinib, acalabrutinib yielded a 3-year ICER of $90,571 (PSA = $88,588)/PFLYg and ICUR of $117,098 ($110,063)/PFQALYg, whereas zanubrutinib yielded a 3-year ICER of $58,422 ($58,907)/PFLYg and ICUR of $73,027 ($73,634)/PFQALYg. The corresponding 5-year estimates were ICER of $73,918 ($74,189)/PFLYg and ICUR of $90,512 ($90,844)/PFQALYg for acalabrutinib and ICER of $48,641 ($48,732)/PFLYg and ICUR of $61,612 ($63,727)/PFQALYg for zanubrutinib. Compared with zanubrutinib, treatment with acalabrutinib yielded a 3-year ICER of $144,633 ($134,964)/PFLYg and ICUR of $197,227 ($166,109)/PFQALYg; the corresponding 5-year estimates were $117,579 ($118,161)/PFLYg and $136,144 ($136,818)/PFQALYg. The EVPI/patient was an NHB of 0.036 PFQALYs and NMB of $3,602 forgone, resulting in a population EVPI of $134,766,957 forgone. The EVPPIs/patient for effectiveness were NHB of 0.015 PFQALYs and NMB of $1,479, with corresponding values of 0.032 and $3,187 for costs and 0.015 and $1,519 for health-related quality of life forgone. This early cost-effectiveness analysis based on phase I/II clinical trials of BTKIs in R/R MCL suggests an additional PFS benefit for second-generation BTKIs compared with ibrutinib. However, the relative uncertainty due to the lack of direct trial evidence may lead to an opportunity cost or lost health benefits if the current evidence is adopted to compare between these products. Additional evidence is needed to address the relative efficacy of the BTKIs. A. McBride serves on speakers bureaus for Coherus BioSciences and Merck. He is now at Bristol-Myers Squibb in a position unrelated to this study. I. Abraham is joint equity owner in Matrix45. By company policy, owners and employees are prohibited from owning equity in client and sponsor organizations (except through mutual funds or other independently administered collective investment instruments), contracting independently with client and sponsor organizations, or receiving compensation independently from such organizations. Matrix45 provides similar services to biopharmaceutical, diagnostics, and medical device companies on a nonexclusivity basis. Of relevance to this article, Matrix45 has not provided any services to this study. I. Abraham is the quantitative methods editor of JAMA and deputy editor-in-chief of the The remaining authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.
伊布替尼、阿卡替尼和泽布替尼在复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤(R/R MCL)中与传统化疗免疫治疗相比,在疗效和安全性方面均有改善。为了评估布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKIs)的比较成本效益,并根据净健康收益(NHB)和净货币收益(NMB)来估计(部分)完全信息(EV[P]PI)的预期值,放弃了。使用两状态马尔可夫模型(无进展;进展或死亡),我们在基础案例和概率敏感性分析(PSA)中分别估计了无进展生存期(PFS)生命年(PFLYs)和 PFS 质量调整后的生命年(PFQALY)的增量成本效益(ICER)和成本效用比(ICUR),分别针对 3 年和 5 年的时间范围。使用 150,000 美元/PFQALY 的支付意愿阈值来评估 PSA 中具有成本效益的概率。EVPI 是从各自的 NHB 和 NMB 计算得出的。与伊布替尼相比,阿卡替尼在 3 年内的 ICER 为 90,571 美元(PSA=88,588 美元)/PFLYg,ICUR 为 117,098 美元(110,063 美元)/PFQALYg,而泽布替尼的 3 年 ICER 为 58,422 美元(58,907 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 73,027 美元(73,634 美元)/PFQALYg。相应的 5 年估计值为阿卡替尼的 ICER 为 73,918 美元(74,189 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 90,512 美元(90,844 美元)/PFQALYg,而泽布替尼的 ICER 为 48,641 美元(48,732 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 61,612 美元(63,727 美元)/PFQALYg。与泽布替尼相比,阿卡替尼的 3 年 ICER 为 144,633 美元(134,964 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 197,227 美元(166,109 美元)/PFQALYg;相应的 5 年估计值为 117,579 美元(118,161 美元)/PFLYg 和 136,144 美元(136,818 美元)/PFQALYg。每位患者的 EVPI 为 0.036 个 PFQALY 和 3602 美元的 NMB,导致人群 EVPI 损失 134766957 美元。有效性的 EVPPIs 为 0.015 个 PFQALY 和 1479 美元的 NMB,对应的成本为 0.032 和 3187 美元,健康相关生活质量的 NMB 为 0.015 和 1519 美元。基于复发/难治性 MCL 中 BTKIs 的 I/II 期临床试验的这项早期成本效益分析表明,与伊布替尼相比,第二代 BTKI 具有额外的 PFS 获益。然而,由于缺乏直接试验证据,相对不确定性可能导致如果采用当前证据来比较这些产品,机会成本或丧失健康收益。需要额外的证据来解决 BTKIs 的相对疗效。A. McBride 担任 Coherus BioSciences 和默克公司的演讲者。他现在在 Bristol-Myers Squibb 担任与本研究无关的职位。I. Abraham 是 Matrix45 的联合股权所有者。根据公司政策,所有者和员工不得拥有客户和赞助商组织的股权(除非通过共同基金或其他独立管理的集体投资工具),与客户和赞助商组织独立签约,或从这些组织获得独立补偿。Matrix45 在非排他性基础上向生物制药、诊断和医疗器械公司提供类似的服务。与本文相关的是,Matrix45 尚未为这项研究提供任何服务。I. Abraham 是 JAMA 的定量方法编辑,也是 的副主任编辑。其他作者没有相关的财务或非财务利益披露。