• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国,用布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗复发或难治性套细胞淋巴瘤的成本效果分析和价值分析。

Cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.

机构信息

Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Department of Clinical Translational Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Apr;28(4):390-400. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.390.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.390
PMID:35332792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372983/
Abstract

Ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib have shown improvements in efficacy and safety over conventional chemoimmunotherapy in refractory or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL). To evaluate the comparative cost-effectiveness of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs) and estimate the expected value of (partial) perfect information (EV[P]PI) in terms of net health benefits (NHBs) and net monetary benefits (NMBs) forgone. Using a two-state Markov model (progression-free; progression or death), we estimated in base-case and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) the incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) and cost-utility ratios (ICUR) of, respectively, progression-free survival (PFS) life-years (PFLYs) and PFS quality-adjusted LY (PFQALY) gained (g) against 3-year and 5-year time horizons. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/PFQALY was used to assess the probability of being cost-effective in the PSA. EVPI was calculated from the respective NHBs and NMBs. Compared with ibrutinib, acalabrutinib yielded a 3-year ICER of $90,571 (PSA = $88,588)/PFLYg and ICUR of $117,098 ($110,063)/PFQALYg, whereas zanubrutinib yielded a 3-year ICER of $58,422 ($58,907)/PFLYg and ICUR of $73,027 ($73,634)/PFQALYg. The corresponding 5-year estimates were ICER of $73,918 ($74,189)/PFLYg and ICUR of $90,512 ($90,844)/PFQALYg for acalabrutinib and ICER of $48,641 ($48,732)/PFLYg and ICUR of $61,612 ($63,727)/PFQALYg for zanubrutinib. Compared with zanubrutinib, treatment with acalabrutinib yielded a 3-year ICER of $144,633 ($134,964)/PFLYg and ICUR of $197,227 ($166,109)/PFQALYg; the corresponding 5-year estimates were $117,579 ($118,161)/PFLYg and $136,144 ($136,818)/PFQALYg. The EVPI/patient was an NHB of 0.036 PFQALYs and NMB of $3,602 forgone, resulting in a population EVPI of $134,766,957 forgone. The EVPPIs/patient for effectiveness were NHB of 0.015 PFQALYs and NMB of $1,479, with corresponding values of 0.032 and $3,187 for costs and 0.015 and $1,519 for health-related quality of life forgone. This early cost-effectiveness analysis based on phase I/II clinical trials of BTKIs in R/R MCL suggests an additional PFS benefit for second-generation BTKIs compared with ibrutinib. However, the relative uncertainty due to the lack of direct trial evidence may lead to an opportunity cost or lost health benefits if the current evidence is adopted to compare between these products. Additional evidence is needed to address the relative efficacy of the BTKIs. A. McBride serves on speakers bureaus for Coherus BioSciences and Merck. He is now at Bristol-Myers Squibb in a position unrelated to this study. I. Abraham is joint equity owner in Matrix45. By company policy, owners and employees are prohibited from owning equity in client and sponsor organizations (except through mutual funds or other independently administered collective investment instruments), contracting independently with client and sponsor organizations, or receiving compensation independently from such organizations. Matrix45 provides similar services to biopharmaceutical, diagnostics, and medical device companies on a nonexclusivity basis. Of relevance to this article, Matrix45 has not provided any services to this study. I. Abraham is the quantitative methods editor of JAMA and deputy editor-in-chief of the The remaining authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

摘要

伊布替尼、阿卡替尼和泽布替尼在复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤(R/R MCL)中与传统化疗免疫治疗相比,在疗效和安全性方面均有改善。为了评估布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKIs)的比较成本效益,并根据净健康收益(NHB)和净货币收益(NMB)来估计(部分)完全信息(EV[P]PI)的预期值,放弃了。使用两状态马尔可夫模型(无进展;进展或死亡),我们在基础案例和概率敏感性分析(PSA)中分别估计了无进展生存期(PFS)生命年(PFLYs)和 PFS 质量调整后的生命年(PFQALY)的增量成本效益(ICER)和成本效用比(ICUR),分别针对 3 年和 5 年的时间范围。使用 150,000 美元/PFQALY 的支付意愿阈值来评估 PSA 中具有成本效益的概率。EVPI 是从各自的 NHB 和 NMB 计算得出的。与伊布替尼相比,阿卡替尼在 3 年内的 ICER 为 90,571 美元(PSA=88,588 美元)/PFLYg,ICUR 为 117,098 美元(110,063 美元)/PFQALYg,而泽布替尼的 3 年 ICER 为 58,422 美元(58,907 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 73,027 美元(73,634 美元)/PFQALYg。相应的 5 年估计值为阿卡替尼的 ICER 为 73,918 美元(74,189 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 90,512 美元(90,844 美元)/PFQALYg,而泽布替尼的 ICER 为 48,641 美元(48,732 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 61,612 美元(63,727 美元)/PFQALYg。与泽布替尼相比,阿卡替尼的 3 年 ICER 为 144,633 美元(134,964 美元)/PFLYg 和 ICUR 为 197,227 美元(166,109 美元)/PFQALYg;相应的 5 年估计值为 117,579 美元(118,161 美元)/PFLYg 和 136,144 美元(136,818 美元)/PFQALYg。每位患者的 EVPI 为 0.036 个 PFQALY 和 3602 美元的 NMB,导致人群 EVPI 损失 134766957 美元。有效性的 EVPPIs 为 0.015 个 PFQALY 和 1479 美元的 NMB,对应的成本为 0.032 和 3187 美元,健康相关生活质量的 NMB 为 0.015 和 1519 美元。基于复发/难治性 MCL 中 BTKIs 的 I/II 期临床试验的这项早期成本效益分析表明,与伊布替尼相比,第二代 BTKI 具有额外的 PFS 获益。然而,由于缺乏直接试验证据,相对不确定性可能导致如果采用当前证据来比较这些产品,机会成本或丧失健康收益。需要额外的证据来解决 BTKIs 的相对疗效。A. McBride 担任 Coherus BioSciences 和默克公司的演讲者。他现在在 Bristol-Myers Squibb 担任与本研究无关的职位。I. Abraham 是 Matrix45 的联合股权所有者。根据公司政策,所有者和员工不得拥有客户和赞助商组织的股权(除非通过共同基金或其他独立管理的集体投资工具),与客户和赞助商组织独立签约,或从这些组织获得独立补偿。Matrix45 在非排他性基础上向生物制药、诊断和医疗器械公司提供类似的服务。与本文相关的是,Matrix45 尚未为这项研究提供任何服务。I. Abraham 是 JAMA 的定量方法编辑,也是 的副主任编辑。其他作者没有相关的财务或非财务利益披露。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.在美国,用布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗复发或难治性套细胞淋巴瘤的成本效果分析和价值分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Apr;28(4):390-400. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.390.
2
Cardiovascular events of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world study based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的心血管事件:基于美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;90(9):2166-2179. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16127. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
BTK Inhibitors and CAR T-Cell Therapy in Treating Mantle Cell Lymphoma-Finding a Dancing Partner.BTK 抑制剂和 CAR T 细胞疗法治疗套细胞淋巴瘤——寻找舞伴。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):1299-1311. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01286-0. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Ibrutinib for Treating Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.依鲁替尼治疗复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤:一项 NICE 单技术评估的循证评价组视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Mar;37(3):333-343. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0713-7.
5
Evaluation of second-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.第二代布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗套细胞淋巴瘤的评估
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):230-235. doi: 10.1177/10781552241232331. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Economic Evaluation of Talimogene Laherparepvec Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy vs Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Melanoma.晚期不可切除黑色素瘤患者接受替莫唑胺联合伊匹单抗与伊匹单抗单药治疗的经济学评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jan 1;155(1):22-28. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3958.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel versus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma following Treatment with a Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Canada.加拿大在接受布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤患者中,使用 Brexucabtagene Autoleucel 与最佳支持治疗相比的成本效果分析。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;29(3):2021-2045. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030164.
8
Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib Versus Other Targeted Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.套细胞淋巴瘤复发/难治患者中阿卡替尼与其他靶向治疗药物疗效和安全性的匹配调整间接比较。
Clin Ther. 2019 Nov;41(11):2357-2379.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
9
Cost-effectiveness for KTE-X19 CAR T therapy for adult patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.KTE-X19 CAR T 疗法治疗美国成人复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):421-431. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1894158.
10
Economic evaluation of polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab tafasitamab-lenalidomide in transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.不可移植的复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者采用泊洛妥珠单抗-苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗、tafasitamab-来那度胺联合方案治疗的经济学评价。
J Med Econ. 2021 Nov;24(sup1):14-24. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2007704.

引用本文的文献

1
Zanubrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Management: A Comprehensive Review.泽布替尼在套细胞淋巴瘤治疗中的应用:一项综合综述。
Blood Lymphat Cancer. 2023 Nov 24;13:67-76. doi: 10.2147/BLCTT.S426588. eCollection 2023.
2
Managing Ibrutinib-Intolerant Patients With B-Cell Malignancies.管理伊布替尼不耐受的 B 细胞恶性肿瘤患者。
Oncologist. 2023 Apr 6;28(4):309-318. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac260.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas, Version 2.2020.NCCN 指南解读:原发性皮肤淋巴瘤,第 2.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 May;18(5):522-536. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0022.
3
Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the Japanese healthcare setting.在日本医疗保健环境中,非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中预防的利伐沙班与华法林的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2020 Mar;23(3):252-261. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1688821. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
4
Phase I/II Clinical Trial-Based Early Economic Evaluation of Acalabrutinib for Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia.基于 I/II 期临床试验的阿卡替尼治疗复发慢性淋巴细胞白血病的早期经济性评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):883-893. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00496-1.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States.在美国,用阿仑单抗治疗多发性硬化症复发型的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015-2016.2015-2016 年美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型治疗药物关键性试验的预估成本。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1451-1457. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3931.
7
Ibrutinib for Treating Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.依鲁替尼治疗复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤:一项 NICE 单技术评估的循证评价组视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Mar;37(3):333-343. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0713-7.
8
Cost-effectiveness of afatinib and erlotinib as second-line treatments for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.阿法替尼与厄洛替尼二线治疗晚期肺鳞癌的成本效果分析。
Future Oncol. 2018 Nov;14(27):2833-2840. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0321. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Endocrine Therapies in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan.日本激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性转移性乳腺癌绝经后女性二线内分泌治疗的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Sep;36(9):1113-1124. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0660-3.
10
Acalabrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (ACE-LY-004): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.阿卡替尼治疗复发或难治性套细胞淋巴瘤(ACE-LY-004):一项单臂、多中心、2 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):659-667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33108-2. Epub 2017 Dec 11.