Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Breastfeed Med. 2022 Jun;17(6):519-527. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2021.0229. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
The aims of this pilot feasibility study were to determine if telesimulations with standardized patients (SPs) wearing high-fidelity breast models impact students' team behavior and clinical competence in lactation support. Medical students ( = 19) completed five telesimulations: Cases 1, 2, 5 in a team, 3 as individual, and 4 randomized. SPs used the Formative Assessment Rubric (FAR) to evaluate interpersonal and clinical competence. Collaboration skills within team-based telesimulations (Cases 2 and 4) were rated using the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR). Satisfaction data were collected from a focus group and written evaluation. Descriptive statistics were calculated for FAR, ICAR, and written evaluations. Appropriate nonparametric tests were used to measure FAR and ICAR differences over time or between team and individual telesimulations and the relationship between FAR and ICAR scores. Content analysis was used to generate themes from focus group data. Learners' interpersonal and lactation-specific competence improved over time ( = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Learners were able "to accept responsibility for their actions" more but spent less time "seeking perspectives from peers" in Case 4 compared with Case 2 ( = 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). Themes from the focus group related to the value of team telesimulations to learn clinical lactation skills and learn about one's role in a team. Learners agreed they developed clinical lactation skills (>4.5/5-pt). Opportunities to work collaboratively in telesimulations with a SP prepare learners for professional collaborations to effectively care for breast/chestfeeding dyads.
本探索性可行性研究的目的是确定使用高保真乳房模型的标准化患者(SP)进行远程模拟是否会影响学生在母乳喂养支持方面的团队行为和临床能力。19 名医学生完成了五次远程模拟:2 个案例作为团队合作,3 个案例作为个人,4 个案例随机分组。SP 使用形成性评估量表(FAR)评估人际和临床能力。使用跨专业协作评估量表(ICAR)对团队远程模拟(案例 2 和 4)中的协作技能进行评分。从焦点小组和书面评估中收集满意度数据。使用 FAR、ICAR 和书面评估的描述性统计数据进行计算。适当的非参数检验用于测量 FAR 和 ICAR 在时间或团队与个人远程模拟之间的差异,以及 FAR 和 ICAR 分数之间的关系。使用内容分析法从焦点小组数据中生成主题。学习者的人际和哺乳特定能力随着时间的推移而提高(分别为 0.003 和 0.009)。与案例 2 相比,案例 4 中的学习者能够“为自己的行为负责”,但花费的时间更少“从同伴那里寻求观点”(分别为 0.01 和 < 0.001)。焦点小组的主题与团队远程模拟在学习临床哺乳技能和了解自己在团队中的角色方面的价值有关。学习者同意他们发展了临床哺乳技能(>4.5/5 分)。在远程模拟中与 SP 协作的机会使学习者为专业合作做好准备,以有效地照顾乳房/母乳喂养对子。