Suppr超能文献

慢性肺部疾病成人的焦虑和共病差异:塞尔维亚单中心经验。

Anxiety and Comorbidities Differences in Adults with Chronic Pulmonary Diseases: Serbian Single Center Experience.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Center for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 6;58(3):392. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030392.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in the degree of the anxiety and comorbidity levels in patients with different chronic pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive bronchitis (COPD) without emphysema phenotype, pulmonary emphysema, bronchial asthma and lung cancer. Materials and Methods: The prospective clinical study included 272 patients that were diagnosed and treated of pulmonary pathology. COPD (without emphysema phenotype) (Group-1), pulmonary emphysema (Group-2), bronchial asthma (Group-3) and lung cancer (Group-4) were assessed. For the evaluation of the anxiety degree, we used Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Results: The degree of cardiovascular symptoms was significantly higher in Group-1 versus Group-2 (p < 0.001), Group-3 (p = 0.001) and Group-4 (p = 0.013), and significantly higher in Group-4 versus Group-2 (p = 0.046). The degree of respiratory symptoms was significantly higher in Group-1 versus Group-2 (p < 0.001), Group-3 (p < 0.001) and Group-4 (p = 0.002), and significantly higher in Group-4 versus Group-2 (p = 0.013) and versus Group-3 (p = 0.023). For gastrointestinal symptoms, the degree of one was significantly higher in Group-1 versus Group-2 (p < 0.001), Group-3 (p < 0.001) and Group-4 (p = 0.017). Somatic subscale values were significantly higher in Group-1 versus Group-2 (p < 0.001), Group-3 (p < 0.001) and Group-4 (p = 0.015), and significantly higher in Group-4 versus Group-2 (p = 0.024). Total HAM-A score was significantly higher in Group-1 versus Group-2 (p = 0.002) and Group-3 (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Patients with COPD (without emphysema phenotype) followed by the lung cancer are at elevated risk of being more mentally challenged in terms of increased anxiety. Furthermore, patients with exacerbation of evaluated pulmonary pathologies have various levels of comorbidities degrees.

摘要

背景和目的

本研究的目的是探讨不同慢性肺部疾病(如无肺气肿表型的慢性阻塞性支气管炎[COPD]、肺气肿、支气管哮喘和肺癌)患者焦虑程度和合并症水平的差异。材料和方法:本前瞻性临床研究纳入了 272 名经诊断和治疗肺部疾病的患者。COPD(无肺气肿表型)(第 1 组)、肺气肿(第 2 组)、支气管哮喘(第 3 组)和肺癌(第 4 组)进行了评估。我们使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)评估焦虑程度。结果:第 1 组心血管症状程度明显高于第 2 组(p < 0.001)、第 3 组(p = 0.001)和第 4 组(p = 0.013),且第 4 组明显高于第 2 组(p = 0.046)。第 1 组呼吸系统症状程度明显高于第 2 组(p < 0.001)、第 3 组(p < 0.001)和第 4 组(p = 0.002),且第 4 组明显高于第 2 组(p = 0.013)和第 3 组(p = 0.023)。第 1 组胃肠道症状 1 级的程度明显高于第 2 组(p < 0.001)、第 3 组(p < 0.001)和第 4 组(p = 0.017)。躯体亚量表分值在第 1 组明显高于第 2 组(p < 0.001)、第 3 组(p < 0.001)和第 4 组(p = 0.015),第 4 组明显高于第 2 组(p = 0.024)。第 1 组 HAM-A 总分明显高于第 2 组(p = 0.002)和第 3 组(p = 0.007)。结论:与肺气肿相比,COPD(无肺气肿表型)患者患肺癌的风险更高,焦虑程度也更高。此外,评估肺部疾病加重的患者具有不同程度的合并症。

相似文献

4
Characteristics of COPD Phenotypes in Serbia.塞尔维亚 COPD 表型特征。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Mar 16;16:643-654. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S300693. eCollection 2021.
5
The effect of comorbidities on COPD assessment: a pilot study.合并症对慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估的影响:一项试点研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 25;10:429-38. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S76124. eCollection 2015.
7
The objective evaluation of obstructive pulmonary diseases with spirometry.通过肺量计对阻塞性肺疾病进行客观评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 25;11:2009-15. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S113774. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity and Asthma.肥胖与哮喘。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Oct;43(5):662-674. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742384. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Anxiety in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.哮喘中的焦虑:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;51(1):11-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005097. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验