• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响微创经皮肾取石术患者残余结石率、手术时间和并发症的因素。

Factors Affecting Residual Stone Rate, Operative Duration, and Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology and General Medicine, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4001 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Department of Urology, University Hospital "Kaspela", 4001 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 13;58(3):422. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030422.

DOI:10.3390/medicina58030422
PMID:35334598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8952422/
Abstract

Background and objectives: Although minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) has demonstrated its efficacy, complete stone clearance was not always achieved, necessitating a second procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with residual stone rate, operative duration, complications, and hospital stay, in order to develop algorithms for pre-operative prognosis and planning. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved 163 Bulgarian patients who underwent MPCNL with Holmium: YAG lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stones. Patients were considered stone-free if no visible fragments (<3 mm) were found on nephroscopy at the end of the procedure, as well as on postoperative X-ray and abdominal ultrasound on the first postoperative day. Results: Immediate postoperative stone-free outcome was attained for 83.43% of the patients (136/163). Residuals were associated with staghorn stones (OR = 72.48, 95% CI: 5.76 to 91.81); stones in two locations (OR = 21.91, 95% CI: 4.15 to 137.56); larger stone size (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.006 to 1.25); and higher density (OR = 1.03, 95% CI:1.005 to 1.06). The overall categorization accuracy for these factors was 93.80%, AUC = 0.971 (95% CI: 0.932 to 0.991), 89.71% sensitivity, and 96.30% specificity. Predictors of prolonged operative duration were staghorn stones and volume, R-square (adj.) = 39.00%, p < 0.001. Longer hospitalization was predicted for patients with hydronephrosis and staghorn stones, R-square (adj.) = 6.82%, p = 0.003. Post-operative complications were rare, predominantly of Clavien-Dindo Grade 1, and were more frequent in patients with hydronephrosis. We did not find a link between their occurrence and the outcome of MPCNL. Conclusions: Staghorn stones and stones in more than one location showed the strongest association with residual stone rate. Staghorn stones and larger volume were linked with a longer operative duration. Hydronephrosis increased the risk of complications and longer hospitalization.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)已被证实有效,但并非总能达到完全清除结石的效果,因此需要进行第二次手术。本研究旨在评估与残石率、手术时间、并发症和住院时间相关的因素,以便为术前预后和计划制定算法。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 163 名接受钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石的保加利亚患者。如果在手术结束时肾镜检查以及术后第一天的 X 射线和腹部超声检查均未发现可见结石碎片(<3mm),则认为患者结石清除。

结果

83.43%(136/163)的患者术后即刻达到结石清除。残石与鹿角形结石(OR=72.48,95%CI:5.76 至 91.81)、两个部位结石(OR=21.91,95%CI:4.15 至 137.56)、较大结石大小(OR=1.12,95%CI:1.006 至 1.25)和较高密度(OR=1.03,95%CI:1.005 至 1.06)相关。这些因素的整体分类准确性为 93.80%,AUC=0.971(95%CI:0.932 至 0.991),敏感性为 89.71%,特异性为 96.30%。鹿角形结石和体积是手术时间延长的预测因素,R-square(adj.)=39.00%,p<0.001。有肾积水和鹿角形结石的患者住院时间更长,R-square(adj.)=6.82%,p=0.003。术后并发症罕见,主要为 Clavien-Dindo 分级 1 级,且在肾积水患者中更为常见。我们未发现其发生与 MPCNL 结果之间存在关联。

结论

鹿角形结石和多个部位结石与残石率的相关性最强。鹿角形结石和较大体积与手术时间延长相关。肾积水增加了并发症和住院时间延长的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/754b62ff9aef/medicina-58-00422-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/e306e15e9b88/medicina-58-00422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/3cde8ea96a22/medicina-58-00422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/ddd78d9a77b8/medicina-58-00422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/754b62ff9aef/medicina-58-00422-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/e306e15e9b88/medicina-58-00422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/3cde8ea96a22/medicina-58-00422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/ddd78d9a77b8/medicina-58-00422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9e/8952422/754b62ff9aef/medicina-58-00422-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting Residual Stone Rate, Operative Duration, and Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.影响微创经皮肾取石术患者残余结石率、手术时间和并发症的因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 13;58(3):422. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030422.
2
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术与多通道微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较:单中心经验。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7.
3
Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of patients with medullary sponge kidney.微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗海绵肾患者的安全性和有效性
Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):421-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0853-6. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?单用上极经皮肾穿刺通路治疗直径大于或等于5厘米的复杂性分支鹿角形结石:是否需要冲击波碎石术?
J Endourol. 2002 Sep;16(7):477-81. doi: 10.1089/089277902760367430.
5
A Multi-institutional Review of Single-access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Staghorn Stones.多中心单通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角状结石的研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1170-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia.局部浸润麻醉下微创经皮肾镜取石术患者无石率和并发症的预测因素。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2637-2643. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03070-5. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) as an effective and safe procedure for large renal stones.微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)治疗大肾结石的有效且安全的方法。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1022-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11191.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Suctioning versus traditional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat renal staghorn calculi: A case-matched comparative study.超声引导经皮肾镜碎石取石术与传统微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:一项病例匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Does Access Location Influence Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Staghorn Stones?穿刺部位会影响鹿角形结石经皮肾镜取石术的结果吗?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Sep;31(9):1075-1080. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.09.1075.
10
Mini- versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough?微通道与标准经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿肾结石:更小就是更好吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):664.e1-664.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of the stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy based on multiple machine learning models.基于多种机器学习模型的经皮肾镜取石术后无结石率的预测价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 19;12:1559613. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1559613. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of severe hydronephrosis on surgical outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL).重度肾积水对微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)手术效果的影响。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):328-342. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.128055. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Combined Antegrade Flexible Ureteroscope for Complete Staghorn Stones: A Case Report of a New Concept of Stone Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Pooled-analysis of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.微创与标准经皮肾镜取石术疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 3;100(35):e27014. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027014.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive vs. standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the surgical management of renal stones.微创与标准经皮肾镜取石术在肾结石外科治疗中的系统评价和荟萃分析
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar;21(3):213. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9645. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
经皮肾镜碎石术联合顺行软性输尿管镜治疗完全鹿角形结石:结石手术新概念的 1 例报告。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 23;59(1):35. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010035.
结石病输尿管镜检查后尿脓毒症的危险因素:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):991-1000. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1133. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Risk Factors for Urosepsis after Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Preoperative Urinary Tract Infection.术前尿路感染患者微创经皮肾镜取石术后尿脓毒症的危险因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 2;2020:1354672. doi: 10.1155/2020/1354672. eCollection 2020.
5
Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local infiltration anesthesia.局部浸润麻醉下微创经皮肾镜取石术患者无石率和并发症的预测因素。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2637-2643. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03070-5. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Comparison of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Secondary Patients: A Randomized Prospective Study.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗继发性肾结石患者的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):26-32. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0538. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
8
Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study.经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Jun;47(3):289-295. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1061-y. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Should mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MiniPNL/Miniperc) be the ideal tract for medium-sized renal calculi (15-30 mm)?经皮肾镜碎石术(MiniPNL/Miniperc)是否适用于治疗 15-30mm 的中等大小肾结石?
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):285-291. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2128-z. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre.微创经皮肾镜取石术(MIP)的实施:在三级中心比较初始学习曲线与后期临床常规。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1933-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2069-6. Epub 2017 Jul 10.