• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前尿路感染患者微创经皮肾镜取石术后尿脓毒症的危险因素。

Risk Factors for Urosepsis after Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Preoperative Urinary Tract Infection.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 2;2020:1354672. doi: 10.1155/2020/1354672. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/1354672
PMID:31998778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6970485/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess risk factors of urosepsis after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in patients with preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and to explore preventive measures. Between 2008 and 2016, patients with preoperative UTI who underwent MPCNL for upper urinary tract stones were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into nonurosepsis and urosepsis groups. Perioperative outcomes of all patients were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Risk factors for post-MPCNL urosepsis were investigated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. A total of 843 patients including 22 patients with postoperative urosepsis (urosepsis group) and 821 patients without urosepsis (nonurosepsis group) were finally included in this study. All patients with postoperative urosepsis were cured and discharged after treatment. In univariate analysis it was demonstrated that the incidence of urosepsis after MPCNL was significantly correlated with channel size (=0.001), surgical time (=0.003), as well as the tear of the collection system and percutaneous renal channel crossing the renal papilla (=0.004). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that smaller channel size (OR = 11.192, 95% CI: 2.425-51.650, =0.002), longer surgical time (OR = 6.762, 95% CI: 1.712-17.844, =0.008), and tear of collection system and percutaneous renal channel crossing the renal papilla (OR = 5.531, 95% CI 1.228-14.469, =0.012) were independent risk factors for urosepsis following MPCNL in patients with preoperative UTI. In conclusion, in patients with preoperative UTI undergoing MPCNL for upper urinary tract stones, smaller channel size, prolonged operation time, as well as tear of the collection system and percutaneous renal channel crossing the renal papilla are independent risk factors for postoperative urosepsis. Therefore, it is indicated that, in clinical practice, it is of great significance to choose appropriate channel size and avoid renal injury and control surgical time to prevent the urosepsis after MPCNL in patients with preoperative UTI.

摘要

本研究旨在评估术前尿路感染(UTI)患者接受微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗上尿路结石后发生尿脓毒症的危险因素,并探讨预防措施。2008 年至 2016 年,回顾性收集了术前 UTI 患者行 MPCNL 治疗上尿路结石的病例。将患者分为非尿脓毒症组和尿脓毒症组。比较两组患者的围手术期结果。采用单因素和多因素回归分析探讨 MPCNL 术后尿脓毒症的危险因素。共纳入 843 例患者,其中术后发生尿脓毒症 22 例(尿脓毒症组),无尿脓毒症 821 例(非尿脓毒症组)。所有术后尿脓毒症患者经治疗后痊愈出院。单因素分析结果显示,MPCNL 术后尿脓毒症的发生率与通道大小(=0.001)、手术时间(=0.003)以及集尿系统撕裂和经皮肾通道穿过肾乳头(=0.004)显著相关。多因素分析显示,较小的通道大小(OR=11.192,95%CI:2.425-51.650,=0.002)、较长的手术时间(OR=6.762,95%CI:1.712-17.844,=0.008)以及集尿系统撕裂和经皮肾通道穿过肾乳头(OR=5.531,95%CI 1.228-14.469,=0.012)是术前 UTI 患者 MPCNL 术后尿脓毒症的独立危险因素。结论:对于术前 UTI 行 MPCNL 治疗上尿路结石的患者,较小的通道大小、较长的手术时间以及集尿系统撕裂和经皮肾通道穿过肾乳头是术后尿脓毒症的独立危险因素。因此,在临床实践中,选择合适的通道大小,避免肾损伤,控制手术时间,对预防术前 UTI 患者 MPCNL 术后尿脓毒症具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/fcf8d19f5e5f/BMRI2020-1354672.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/9616c229796b/BMRI2020-1354672.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/77db28d59632/BMRI2020-1354672.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/fcf8d19f5e5f/BMRI2020-1354672.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/9616c229796b/BMRI2020-1354672.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/77db28d59632/BMRI2020-1354672.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/6970485/fcf8d19f5e5f/BMRI2020-1354672.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Urosepsis after Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Preoperative Urinary Tract Infection.术前尿路感染患者微创经皮肾镜取石术后尿脓毒症的危险因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 2;2020:1354672. doi: 10.1155/2020/1354672. eCollection 2020.
2
The evaluation of early predictive factors for urosepsis in patients with negative preoperative urine culture following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后术前尿培养阴性患者尿脓毒症的早期预测因素评估。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2629-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03050-9. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
3
Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Urosepsis After Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Large Kidney Stones.大肾结石患者微创经皮肾镜取石术后尿脓毒症的术前危险因素分析
J Endourol. 2022 Mar;36(3):292-297. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0406.
4
Suctioning versus traditional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat renal staghorn calculi: A case-matched comparative study.超声引导经皮肾镜碎石取石术与传统微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:一项病例匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
5
Early and rapid prediction of postoperative infections following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with complex kidney stones.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后复杂肾结石患者术后感染的早期快速预测。
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1041-1047. doi: 10.1111/bju.14484. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
[Predicting model based on risk factors for urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy].基于经皮肾镜取石术后尿脓毒症危险因素的预测模型
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Jun 18;50(3):507-513.
7
Risk factors and prediction model of urosepsis in patients with diabetes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石术后糖尿病患者尿脓毒症的危险因素及预测模型。
BMC Urol. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00799-3.
8
Comparison of super-mini versus mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children: a single centre experience.比较超微经皮肾镜碎石术与微经皮肾镜碎石术治疗儿童上尿路结石:单中心经验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Aug;37(8):1141-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04925-y. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Clinical study on the minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of upper urinary calculi.微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的临床研究
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Feb 6;10(4):1198-1205. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1198.
10
Predictors for uroseptic shock in patients who undergo minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy.微创经皮肾镜取石术患者发生尿脓毒血症性休克的预测因素。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):573-578. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0963-4. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and interventions for post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy urinary tract infection in diabetic patients with renal calculi.糖尿病合并肾结石患者经皮肾镜取石术后尿路感染的危险因素及干预措施
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):6462-6469. doi: 10.62347/KPKW8743. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning curve of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the treatment of complex renal calculi.超声引导经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的学习曲线。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Mar;52(3):3000605241239026. doi: 10.1177/03000605241239026.
3
Risk factors of concurrent urinary sepsis in patients with diabetes mellitus comorbid with upper urinary tract calculi.

本文引用的文献

1
Suctioning Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a Patented System Is Effective to Treat Renal Staghorn Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Study.使用专利系统进行微创经皮肾镜取石术吸引治疗鹿角形肾结石有效:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Urol Int. 2018;101(2):143-149. doi: 10.1159/000488399. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Urinary Stone Disease: Diagnosis, Medical Therapy, and Surgical Management.尿石症:诊断、药物治疗及手术管理
Med Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;102(2):265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL: A randomised clinical trial.
糖尿病合并上尿路结石患者并发尿源性脓毒症的危险因素
World J Diabetes. 2023 Sep 15;14(9):1403-1411. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i9.1403.
4
The Mayo adhesive probability score predicts postoperative fever and intraoperative hemorrhage in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Mayo 黏附概率评分可预测微创经皮肾镜取石术中术后发热和术中出血。
World J Urol. 2023 Sep;41(9):2503-2509. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04529-2. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Correlation Between the Grade of Hydronephrosis with Surgical Outcomes After Ultrasound-guided Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.超声引导下仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术后肾积水程度与手术结果的相关性:一项回顾性观察研究
Medeni Med J. 2023 Jun 20;38(2):120-127. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.85688.
6
Can we identify the risk factors for SIRS/sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A meta‑analysis and literature review.我们能否确定经皮肾镜取石术后发生全身炎症反应综合征/脓毒症的危险因素?一项荟萃分析及文献综述。
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Jan 25;25(3):110. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11809. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Factors Affecting Residual Stone Rate, Operative Duration, and Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.影响微创经皮肾取石术患者残余结石率、手术时间和并发症的因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 13;58(3):422. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030422.
8
Nomograms for Predicting the Risk of SIRS and Urosepsis after Uroscopic Minimally Invasive Lithotripsy.尿石症经皮肾镜碎石术后全身炎症反应综合征和尿脓毒症风险的预测列线图。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 11;2022:6808239. doi: 10.1155/2022/6808239. eCollection 2022.
9
Risk factors for urinary infection after retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy: Implication for nursing.逆行性上尿路碎石术后尿路感染的危险因素:对护理的启示。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 6;100(31):e26172. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026172.
10
Risk factors for urosepsis in chronic kidney disease patients with urinary tract infections.慢性肾脏病尿路感染患者发生尿脓毒血症的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 13;11(1):14414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93912-3.
超微经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与标准PCNL:一项随机临床试验。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Nov 12;15(4):294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.003. eCollection 2017 Dec.
4
Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小型经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术不同通道大小的系统评价和Meta分析
J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1101-1110. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0547. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre.微创经皮肾镜取石术(MIP)的实施:在三级中心比较初始学习曲线与后期临床常规。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1933-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2069-6. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
Antibiotic use and the prevention and management of infectious complications in stone disease.抗生素的使用以及结石病感染并发症的预防和管理。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1369-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2005-9. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
8
An update on classification and management of urosepsis.泌尿道脓毒症的分类与管理更新
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Mar;27(2):133-137. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000364.
9
Pre- and Postoperative Predictors of Infection-Related Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术患者感染相关并发症的术前和术后预测因素
J Endourol. 2016 Sep;30(9):982-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0191. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
10
'Mini, ultra, micro' - nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques.“迷你、超、微”——这些新型微创经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)技术的命名及成本
Ther Adv Urol. 2016 Apr;8(2):142-6. doi: 10.1177/1756287215617674. Epub 2015 Nov 26.