Suppr超能文献

开发和验证新的家庭烹饪频率问卷:一项试点研究。

Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, IdiSNA, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.

CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1136. doi: 10.3390/nu14061136.

Abstract

Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values > 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.

摘要

在家烹饪和烹饪技术的类型可能会对我们的健康产生影响。然而,据我们所知,目前还没有一种问卷能够深入衡量家庭烹饪技术的使用频率和类型。我们的目的是设计一种新的家庭烹饪频率问卷(HCFQ),并初步评估其心理测量学特性。为此,我们采用了五阶段方法,如下所示:阶段 1:根据专家意见、相关文献和以往调查生成项目;阶段 2:由专家评估相关性和清晰度的内容有效性(流行病学家、营养师、厨师);阶段 3:表面有效性和项目间信度;阶段 4:使用 7 天的食物和烹饪记录进行效标效度;阶段 5:测试稳定性和项目间信度。量表和项目水平值的内容有效性指数为相关性和清晰度提供了内容有效性的证据。效标效度分析表明,组内相关系数范围为 0.31-0.69。测试-重测信度系数范围为 0.49-0.92,κ 值>0.44。总体 Cronbach's α 为 0.90。总之,HCFQ 是一种有前途的工具,具有良好的内容和表面有效性、实质性的效标效度和足够的可靠性。这个包含 174 个项目的 HCFQ 是第一个评估人们在家烹饪频率以及他们使用哪种烹饪方法的问卷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a5a/8950242/459e774ebcd6/nutrients-14-01136-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验