Gopaul Chavin D, Ventour Dale, Thomas Davlin
The North Central Regional Health Authority, Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Uriah Butler Highway, Champs Fleur 259807, Trinidad and Tobago.
Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine 999183, Trinidad and Tobago.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 18;10(3):466. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030466.
Vaccine hesitancy due to safety concerns is a hindrance to the success of vaccination campaigns. In February 2021, Trinidad and Tobago commenced its National COVID-19 Vaccination Program. Healthcare workers were among the first group to receive the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford−AstraZeneca (Covishield, Serum Institute of India, Pune, India), the first COVID-19 vaccine available nationally. This study examined the safety of this vaccine in terms of the systemic and local adverse events following immunization reported by healthcare worker recipients. A cross-sectional study was conducted via a telephone questionnaire. Data concerning demographics, medical and COVID-19-related anamneses, and local and systemic side effects experienced within the first 48 h after receiving the first and second dose of this vaccine, respectively, were gathered. Among the 687 participants (male = 275; female = 412), prevalence of fever, body pain, chills, nausea, myalgia, headache, malaise, fatigue, and other systemic symptoms declined significantly 48 h after administration of the second dose compared to the first dose. Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression demonstrated the greater likelihood of younger recipients to report systemic symptoms compared to older recipients. Multiple logistic regression indicated that females were more likely to report headache, fatigue, and discomfort, and were less likely to report no symptoms, compared to males, after both doses. On average, recipients reported less local and systemic side effects 48 h after receiving the second dose compared to the first dose. The reported rate of occurrence of side effects was <50% for most adverse events, which is consistent with the manufacturer’s claims that the vaccine is safe. This study adds data on the safety of this vaccine in a population that has not been previously studied. The findings can inform public health policy efforts to lower vaccine hesitancy based on safety concerns surrounding the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine across various groups in society, including healthcare workers.
因安全担忧导致的疫苗犹豫是疫苗接种运动成功的障碍。2021年2月,特立尼达和多巴哥启动了其国家新冠疫苗接种计划。医护人员是首批接种ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(牛津-阿斯利康(Covishield,印度血清研究所,印度浦那))疫苗的群体之一,这是该国可获得的首款新冠疫苗。本研究根据接种疫苗的医护人员报告的免疫接种后全身和局部不良事件,考察了该疫苗的安全性。通过电话问卷进行了一项横断面研究。收集了有关人口统计学、医疗和新冠相关既往史,以及分别在接种该疫苗第一剂和第二剂后的48小时内经历的局部和全身副作用的数据。在687名参与者(男性=275名;女性=412名)中,与第一剂相比,第二剂接种48小时后,发热、身体疼痛、寒战、恶心、肌痛、头痛、不适、疲劳及其他全身症状的发生率显著下降。卡方检验和多元逻辑回归表明,与年长的接受者相比,年轻的接受者更有可能报告全身症状。多元逻辑回归表明,两剂接种后,女性比男性更有可能报告头痛、疲劳和不适,且不太可能报告无症状。平均而言,与第一剂相比,接受者在接种第二剂后的48小时内报告的局部和全身副作用较少。大多数不良事件的报告副作用发生率<50%,这与制造商声称该疫苗安全的说法一致。本研究补充了此前尚未研究人群中该疫苗安全性的数据。这些发现可为公共卫生政策提供信息,以降低社会各群体(包括医护人员)因对ChAdOx1 nCoV-19疫苗安全性的担忧而产生的疫苗犹豫。