Suppr超能文献

CoronaVac 和 ChAdOx1 疫苗在类风湿关节炎患者中预防 SARS-CoV-2 的安全性:来自巴西多中心研究 safer 的数据。

Safety of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Brazilian multicentric study safer.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.

出版信息

Adv Rheumatol. 2024 Aug 12;64(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00397-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination to mitigate the infection severity risks. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, especially those under immunosuppression or with associated comorbidities. However, few studies have assessed the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with RA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with RA.

METHODS

This data are from the study "Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases," a Brazilian multicentric prospective phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in IMRDs in Brazil. Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA of all centers were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) or CoronaVac (Sinovac/Butantan). Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily and returned at the end of 28 days for each dose.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients with RA were include, 90% female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed, mainly after the first dose. The most common AEs after the first dose were pain at the injection (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%), myalgia (30,5%) and fatigue (26,6%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection (66% vs 32 %, p < 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p < 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p < 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%), headache (21%) and fatigue (18%). Arthralgia (41,4% vs 25%, p = 0.02) and pain at injection (51,4% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No serious AEs were related. With Regard to RA activity level, no significant difference was observed between the three time periods for both COVID-19 vaccines.

CONCLUSION

In the comparison between the two immunizers in patients with RA, local reactions and musculoskeletal symptoms were more frequent with ChAdOx1 than with CoronaVac, especially after the first dose. In summary, the AE occurred mainly after the first dose, and were mild, like previous data from others immunizing agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Vaccination did not worsen the degree of disease activity.

摘要

背景

免疫介导的风湿性疾病(IMRDs)患者已被优先接种 COVID-19 疫苗,以降低感染严重程度的风险。类风湿关节炎(RA)患者患严重 COVID-19 结局的风险很高,尤其是那些接受免疫抑制治疗或伴有合并症的患者。然而,很少有研究评估 RA 患者接种 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性。

目的

评估 RA 患者接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的安全性。

方法

本数据来自巴西多中心前瞻性 IV 期研究“风湿性疾病中 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和有效性”,该研究旨在评估巴西 IMRDs 中 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性。所有中心的 RA 患者在接种 ChAdOx1(牛津/阿斯利康)或 CoronaVac(科兴/布坦坦)两剂后评估不良事件(AE)。使用日记对疫苗接种后 AE 进行分层,每天填写并在每剂结束后 28 天返回。

结果

共纳入 188 例 RA 患者,90%为女性。109 例患者使用 CoronaVac,79 例患者使用 ChAdOx1。仅观察到轻度 AE,主要发生在第一剂后。第一剂后最常见的 AE 是注射部位疼痛(46.7%)、头痛(39.4%)、关节痛(39.4%)、肌痛(30.5%)和疲劳(26.6%),且 ChAdOx1 注射部位疼痛(66% vs 32%,p<0.001)、关节痛(62% vs 22%,p<0.001)和肌痛(45% vs 20%,p<0.001)的频率均高于 CoronaVac。第二剂后更常见的 AE 是注射部位疼痛(37%)、关节痛(31%)、肌痛(23%)、头痛(21%)和疲劳(18%)。ChAdOx1 更常见的关节痛(41.4% vs 25%,p=0.02)和注射部位疼痛(51.4% vs 27%,p=0.001)。关于 RA 活动水平,两种 COVID-19 疫苗在三个时间段均未观察到显著差异。

结论

在 RA 患者中两种免疫制剂的比较中,ChAdOx1 引起的局部反应和肌肉骨骼症状比 CoronaVac 更为常见,尤其是在第一剂后。总之,AE 主要发生在第一剂后,且为轻度,与之前类风湿关节炎患者使用其他免疫制剂的数据相似。接种疫苗并未加重疾病活动度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验