• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美普清(匹美西林加匹氨西林)与安灭菌(阿莫西林加克拉维酸)治疗全科医疗中下呼吸道感染的对比研究。

A comparative study of Miraxid (pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin) and Augmentin (amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid) in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in general practice.

作者信息

McGhie D, Kerfoot P, Talbot D J

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1986;14(5):254-60. doi: 10.1177/030006058601400505.

DOI:10.1177/030006058601400505
PMID:3533674
Abstract

Two treatments, pivmecillinam 200 mg plus pivampicillin 250 mg (Miraxid) given twice-daily and amoxycillin 250 mg plus clavulanic acid 125 mg (Augmentin) given three times daily were compared in two parallel groups of 388 general practice patients with acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Patients with acute bronchitis (140 on Miraxid, 144 on Augmentin) received a 7-day course of treatment and those with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (55 on Miraxid, 49 on Augmentin) a 10-day course of treatment. Both treatments were equally effective, with 99 (71%) patients with acute bronchitis being successfully treated with Miraxid and 107 (74%) with Augmentin. In acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, Miraxid was successful in 29 (53%) patients and Augmentin in 24 (49%) patients. Side-effects were reported by 26 (12%) of patients in both treatment groups. This single blind multicentre general practice study comparing twice-daily Miraxid with 3 times daily Augmentin demonstrated that both treatments were equally effective clinically and equally well tolerated.

摘要

在两组各有388名患有急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重的全科门诊患者中,对两种治疗方案进行了比较。一种方案是每天两次服用200毫克匹美西林和250毫克匹氨西林(Miraxid),另一种方案是每天三次服用250毫克阿莫西林和125毫克克拉维酸(阿莫西林克拉维酸钾,Augmentin)。患有急性支气管炎的患者(140人服用Miraxid,144人服用阿莫西林克拉维酸钾)接受为期7天的疗程治疗,而患有慢性支气管炎急性加重的患者(55人服用Miraxid,49人服用阿莫西林克拉维酸钾)接受为期10天的疗程治疗。两种治疗方案效果相当,服用Miraxid的140例急性支气管炎患者中有99例(71%)得到成功治疗,服用阿莫西林克拉维酸钾的144例中有107例(74%)。在慢性支气管炎急性加重患者中,服用Miraxid的55例中有29例(53%)治疗成功,服用阿莫西林克拉维酸钾的49例中有24例(49%)。两个治疗组中均有26例(12%)患者报告有副作用。这项单盲多中心全科门诊研究比较了每日两次服用Miraxid和每日三次服用阿莫西林克拉维酸钾的疗效,结果表明两种治疗方案在临床疗效和耐受性方面均相当。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of Miraxid (pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin) and Augmentin (amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid) in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in general practice.美普清(匹美西林加匹氨西林)与安灭菌(阿莫西林加克拉维酸)治疗全科医疗中下呼吸道感染的对比研究。
J Int Med Res. 1986;14(5):254-60. doi: 10.1177/030006058601400505.
2
A comparison of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and amoxycillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.匹美西林/匹氨西林与阿莫西林在慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较。
J Int Med Res. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(2):115-20. doi: 10.1177/030006058701500209.
3
A clinical comparison of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin (Miraxid) and a triple tetracycline combination (Deteclo) in respiratory infections treated in general practice.在全科医疗中治疗呼吸道感染时,匹美西林加匹氨西林(Miraxid)与三联四环素组合(Deteclo)的临床比较。
J Int Med Res. 1985;13(4):197-202. doi: 10.1177/030006058501300401.
4
A comparative trial of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the therapy of urinary tract infection in a general practice population.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;9(5):310-5. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109598.
5
A multi-centre general practice clinical evaluation of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin ('Miraxid') and co-trimoxazole ('Septrin') in respiratory tract infections.多中心全科医疗对匹美西林加匹氨西林(“Miraxid”)与复方新诺明(“Septrin”)治疗呼吸道感染的临床评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(10):659-65. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109648.
6
A multi-centre general practice comparison of a fixed-dose combination of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin with amoxycillin in respiratory tract infections.多中心全科医疗中,匹美西林与匹氨西林固定剂量复方制剂和阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的比较。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1985;4(5):300-5.
7
Double-blind comparison of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin ('Miraxid') with pivampicillin alone in chronic bronchitis: a Danish multi-centre study.匹美西林加匹氨西林(“Miraxid”)与单用匹氨西林治疗慢性支气管炎的双盲比较:一项丹麦多中心研究。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1983;3(6):422-8.
8
A comparison of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and co-trimoxazole in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.住院慢性支气管炎急性加重患者中匹美西林/匹氨西林与复方新诺明的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Aug;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.2.179.
9
General practice studies with combined pivampicillin/pivmecillinam (Miraxid).复方匹氨西林/匹美西林(美拉西定)的全科医学研究。
Ir Med J. 1985 Nov;78(11):314-7.
10
A multicentre general practice study comparing pivampicillin (Pondocillin) and amoxycillin (Amoxil) in respiratory tract infections.
J Int Med Res. 1983;11(6):370-4. doi: 10.1177/030006058301100609.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review.四十年临床经验中匹美西林的安全性和耐受性:一项系统评价
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 24;80(2):280-299. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae621.
2
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.阿莫西林/克拉维酸:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途的最新进展
Drugs. 1990 Feb;39(2):264-307. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039020-00008.