Departemen of Economics, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.
Yayasan Inisitatif Perubahan Akses Menuju Sehat (IPAS) Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07765-1.
Despite the increasing trend of Postabortion Care (PAC) needs and provision, the evidence related to its cost is lacking. This study aims to review the costs of Postabortion Care (PAC) per patient at a national level.
A systematic review of literature related to PAC cost published in 1994 - October 2020 was performed. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were used to search the literature. Following the title and abstract screening, reporting quality was appraised using the Consolidates Health Economic Evaluation (CHEERS) checklist. PAC costs were extrapolated into US dollars ($US) and international dollars ($I), both in 2019.
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported direct medical cost per patient in accessing PAC, but only three of them included indirect medical cost. All studies reported either average or range of cost. In terms of range, the highest direct cost of PAC with MVA (Medical Vacuum Aspiration) services can be found in Colombia, between $US50.58-212.47, while the lowest is in Malawi ($US15.2-139.19). The highest direct cost of PAC with D&C (Dilatation and Curettage), services is in El Salvador ($US65.22-240.75), while the lowest is in Bangladesh ($US15.71-103.85). Among two studies providing average indirect cost data, Uganda with $US105.04 has the highest average indirect medical cost, while Rwanda with $US51.44 has the lowest.
Our review shows variability in the cost of PAC across countries. This study depicts a clearer picture of how costly it is for women to access PAC services, although it is still seemingly underestimated. When a study compared the use of UE (Uterine Evacuation) method between MVA and D&C, it is confirmed that MVA treatments tend to have lower costs and potentially reduce a significant cost. Therefore, by looking at both clinical and economic perspectives, improving and strengthening the quality and accessibility of PAC with MVA is a priority.
尽管人工流产后护理(Postabortion Care,PAC)的需求和提供呈上升趋势,但缺乏与之相关的成本证据。本研究旨在综述全国范围内每位患者的 PAC 成本。
对 1994 年至 2020 年 10 月发表的有关 PAC 成本的文献进行了系统回顾。使用电子数据库,如 PubMed、Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 等,检索文献。在标题和摘要筛选之后,使用统一健康经济评估(Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation,CHEERS)清单评估报告质量。将 PAC 成本外推至 2019 年的美元($US)和国际美元($I)。
符合纳入标准的有 12 项研究。所有研究均报告了接受 PAC 服务的每位患者的直接医疗费用,但只有 3 项研究包括间接医疗费用。所有研究均报告了成本的平均值或范围。就范围而言,在接受 MVA(机械吸引流产术)服务的 PAC 中,哥伦比亚的直接成本最高,为 50.58-212.47 美元,而马拉维的最低,为 15.2-139.19 美元。在接受 D&C(扩张和刮宫术)服务的 PAC 中,萨尔瓦多的直接成本最高,为 65.22-240.75 美元,而孟加拉国的最低,为 15.71-103.85 美元。在提供平均间接成本数据的两项研究中,乌干达的平均间接医疗费用最高,为 105.04 美元,而卢旺达的最低,为 51.44 美元。
本综述表明各国 PAC 成本存在差异。尽管它仍然被低估,但本研究更清晰地描绘了女性获得 PAC 服务的成本。当一项研究比较 MVA 和 D&C 两种方法对 UE(子宫排空术)的使用时,证实 MVA 治疗的成本更低,且具有降低成本的潜力。因此,从临床和经济角度来看,提高和加强 MVA 质量和可及性是 PAC 的重点。