Suppr超能文献

制定亚急性康复最低数据集:三轮电子德尔菲共识研究。

Development of a minimum dataset for subacute rehabilitation: a three-round e-Delphi consensus study.

机构信息

Allied Health Professions, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a minimum dataset to be routinely collected across a heterogenous population within a subacute rehabilitation service to guide best care and outcomes for patients, and value for the health service.

DESIGN

Three-round e-Delphi exercise, followed by consensus meetings.

SETTING

Multicentre study in Brisbane, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Rehabilitation decision-makers, researchers and clinicians were invited to participate in the e-Delphi exercise. A multidisciplinary project steering committee (rehabilitation decision makers, researchers, clinicians and consumers) participated in consensus meetings.

METHODS

In round 1 of the e-Delphi, participants responded to an open-ended question, generating data and outcomes that should be routinely collected in rehabilitation. In rounds 2 and 3, participants rated the importance of collecting each item on a nine-point scale. Consensus was defined a priori, as items rated as 'essential' by at least 70%, and of 'limited importance' by less than 15%, of respondents. Consensus meetings were held to further refine and define the dataset for implementation.

RESULTS

In total, 38 participants completed round 1 of the e-Delphi. Qualitative content analysis of their responses generated 1072 codes, which were condensed into 39 categories and 209 subcategories. Following two rounds of rating (round 2: n=32 participants; round 3: n=28 participants), consensus was reached for 124 items. Four consensus meetings (n=14 participants) resulted in the final dataset which included 42 items across six domains: (1) patient demographics, (2) premorbid health and psychosocial information, (3) admission information, (4) service delivery and interventions, (5) outcomes and (6) caregiver information and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 42 items that reflect the values and experiences of rehabilitation stakeholders. Items unique to this dataset include caregiver information and outcomes, and detailed service delivery and intervention data. Future research will establish the feasibility of collection in practice.

摘要

目的

为了在亚急性康复服务中针对不同人群制定一个最小数据集,以指导患者获得最佳护理和结果,并为医疗服务提供价值。

方法

三轮电子德尔菲法研究,随后进行共识会议。

地点

澳大利亚布里斯班的多中心研究。

参与者

康复决策者、研究人员和临床医生受邀参加电子德尔菲研究。一个多学科项目指导委员会(康复决策者、研究人员、临床医生和消费者)参加了共识会议。

结果

在电子德尔菲研究的第一轮中,参与者回答了一个开放式问题,提出了应在康复中常规收集的数据和结果。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者根据九点量表对收集每个项目的重要性进行了评分。共识的定义是预先确定的,即至少有 70%的受访者认为某个项目是“必不可少的”,而少于 15%的受访者认为该项目“不重要”。举行了共识会议,以进一步完善和定义用于实施的数据集。

结论

我们确定了 42 个项目,这些项目反映了康复利益相关者的价值观和经验。该数据集中包含 42 项内容,分为六个领域:(1)患者人口统计学信息;(2)发病前健康和心理社会信息;(3)入院信息;(4)服务提供和干预措施;(5)结果;(6)照顾者信息和结果。

结论

我们确定了 42 个项目,这些项目反映了康复利益相关者的价值观和经验。该数据集中包含 42 项内容,分为六个领域:(1)患者人口统计学信息;(2)发病前健康和心理社会信息;(3)入院信息;(4)服务提供和干预措施;(5)结果;(6)照顾者信息和结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a65/8961134/3e9442cdff3e/bmjopen-2021-058725f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验