Allied Health Professions, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.
To develop a minimum dataset to be routinely collected across a heterogenous population within a subacute rehabilitation service to guide best care and outcomes for patients, and value for the health service.
Three-round e-Delphi exercise, followed by consensus meetings.
Multicentre study in Brisbane, Australia.
Rehabilitation decision-makers, researchers and clinicians were invited to participate in the e-Delphi exercise. A multidisciplinary project steering committee (rehabilitation decision makers, researchers, clinicians and consumers) participated in consensus meetings.
In round 1 of the e-Delphi, participants responded to an open-ended question, generating data and outcomes that should be routinely collected in rehabilitation. In rounds 2 and 3, participants rated the importance of collecting each item on a nine-point scale. Consensus was defined a priori, as items rated as 'essential' by at least 70%, and of 'limited importance' by less than 15%, of respondents. Consensus meetings were held to further refine and define the dataset for implementation.
In total, 38 participants completed round 1 of the e-Delphi. Qualitative content analysis of their responses generated 1072 codes, which were condensed into 39 categories and 209 subcategories. Following two rounds of rating (round 2: n=32 participants; round 3: n=28 participants), consensus was reached for 124 items. Four consensus meetings (n=14 participants) resulted in the final dataset which included 42 items across six domains: (1) patient demographics, (2) premorbid health and psychosocial information, (3) admission information, (4) service delivery and interventions, (5) outcomes and (6) caregiver information and outcomes.
We identified 42 items that reflect the values and experiences of rehabilitation stakeholders. Items unique to this dataset include caregiver information and outcomes, and detailed service delivery and intervention data. Future research will establish the feasibility of collection in practice.
为了在亚急性康复服务中针对不同人群制定一个最小数据集,以指导患者获得最佳护理和结果,并为医疗服务提供价值。
三轮电子德尔菲法研究,随后进行共识会议。
澳大利亚布里斯班的多中心研究。
康复决策者、研究人员和临床医生受邀参加电子德尔菲研究。一个多学科项目指导委员会(康复决策者、研究人员、临床医生和消费者)参加了共识会议。
在电子德尔菲研究的第一轮中,参与者回答了一个开放式问题,提出了应在康复中常规收集的数据和结果。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者根据九点量表对收集每个项目的重要性进行了评分。共识的定义是预先确定的,即至少有 70%的受访者认为某个项目是“必不可少的”,而少于 15%的受访者认为该项目“不重要”。举行了共识会议,以进一步完善和定义用于实施的数据集。
我们确定了 42 个项目,这些项目反映了康复利益相关者的价值观和经验。该数据集中包含 42 项内容,分为六个领域:(1)患者人口统计学信息;(2)发病前健康和心理社会信息;(3)入院信息;(4)服务提供和干预措施;(5)结果;(6)照顾者信息和结果。
我们确定了 42 个项目,这些项目反映了康复利益相关者的价值观和经验。该数据集中包含 42 项内容,分为六个领域:(1)患者人口统计学信息;(2)发病前健康和心理社会信息;(3)入院信息;(4)服务提供和干预措施;(5)结果;(6)照顾者信息和结果。