• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重视患者在医疗过程中的体验:推动现有方法的更广泛应用。

Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: towards broader applications of existing methods.

作者信息

Ryan Mandy, Kinghorn Philip, Entwistle Vikki A, Francis Jill J

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK. Electronic address: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/heru.

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK; Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106(100):194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.013
PMID:24568844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3988932/
Abstract

Healthcare policy leaders internationally recognise that people's experiences of healthcare delivery are important, and invest significant resources to monitor and improve them. However, the value of particular aspects of experiences of healthcare delivery - relative to each other and to other healthcare outcomes - is unclear. This paper considers how economic techniques have been and might be used to generate quantitative estimates of the value of particular experiences of healthcare delivery. A recently published conceptual map of patients' experiences served to guide the scope and focus of the enquiry. The map represented both what health services and staff are like and do and what individual patients can feel like, be and do (while they are using services and subsequently). We conducted a systematic search for applications of economic techniques to healthcare delivery. We found that these techniques have been quite widely used to estimate the value of features of healthcare systems and processes (e.g. of care delivery by a nurse rather than a doctor, or of a consultation of 10 minutes rather than 15 minutes), but much less to estimate the value of the implications of these features for patients personally. To inform future research relating to the valuation of experiences of healthcare delivery, we organised a workshop for key stakeholders. Participants undertook and discussed 'exercises' that explored the use of different economic techniques to value descriptions of healthcare delivery that linked processes to what patients felt like and were able to be and do. The workshop identified a number of methodological issues that need careful attention, and highlighted some important concerns about the ways in which quantitative estimates of the value of experiences of healthcare delivery might be used. However the workshop confirmed enthusiasm for efforts to attend directly to the implications of healthcare delivery from patients' perspectives, including in terms of their capabilities.

摘要

国际医疗保健政策领导者认识到人们在医疗保健服务过程中的体验很重要,并投入大量资源来监测和改善这些体验。然而,医疗保健服务体验中特定方面的价值——相对于彼此以及相对于其他医疗保健结果——尚不清楚。本文探讨了经济技术如何已经以及可能被用于对医疗保健服务特定体验的价值进行定量估计。最近发布的一份患者体验概念图为该调查的范围和重点提供了指导。该图既展示了医疗服务和工作人员的情况及行为,也展示了个体患者在使用服务期间及之后的感受、状态和行为。我们对经济技术在医疗保健服务中的应用进行了系统搜索。我们发现这些技术已被广泛用于估计医疗保健系统和流程特征的价值(例如护士而非医生提供护理的价值,或10分钟而非15分钟咨询的价值),但用于估计这些特征对患者个人影响的价值的情况则少得多。为了为未来有关医疗保健服务体验估值的研究提供信息参考,我们为关键利益相关者组织了一次研讨会。参与者进行并讨论了“练习”,这些练习探索了使用不同经济技术对将流程与患者的感受、状态和行为联系起来的医疗保健服务描述进行估值。该研讨会确定了一些需要仔细关注的方法学问题,并强调了对医疗保健服务体验价值定量估计可能的使用方式的一些重要担忧。然而,该研讨会证实了人们对直接从患者角度关注医疗保健服务影响(包括在其能力方面)的努力的热情。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/728e0aada3fa/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/60c3bdb089f7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/75206dbd8630/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/728e0aada3fa/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/60c3bdb089f7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/75206dbd8630/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c632/3988932/728e0aada3fa/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: towards broader applications of existing methods.重视患者在医疗过程中的体验:推动现有方法的更广泛应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106(100):194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map.哪些医疗服务体验对服务使用者重要,原因是什么?批判性综合解释和概念图。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17(2):70-8. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.
5
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Feasibility of in-home monitoring for people with glaucoma: the I-TRAC mixed-methods study.家庭监测青光眼患者的可行性:I-TRAC 混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(44):1-163. doi: 10.3310/GTWD6802.
9
Qualitative Study定性研究
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling Elements of Value of Healthcare and Assessing their Importance Using Evidence from Two Discrete-Choice Experiments in England.揭示医疗保健价值的要素,并利用来自英国两项离散选择实验的证据评估其重要性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Oct;42(10):1145-1159. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01416-5. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Valuing Outpatients' Perspective on Primary Health Care Services in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Satisfaction and Personal-Centered Care.重视希腊门诊患者对初级卫生保健服务的看法:一项关于满意度和以患者为中心护理的横断面调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;12(14):1427. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141427.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care.将患者视为个体:以能力为导向的方法支持提供以患者为中心的护理。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(8):29-39. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.802060.
2
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
3
Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map.
Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.
产前和新生儿筛查计划在健康经济评估中的获益和危害:VALENTIA 系统评价和定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(25):1-180. doi: 10.3310/PYTK6591.
4
Development of a minimum dataset for subacute rehabilitation: a three-round e-Delphi consensus study.制定亚急性康复最低数据集:三轮电子德尔菲共识研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.
5
Conceptualising 'Benefits Beyond Health' in the Context of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.在质量调整生命年背景下对“健康之外的益处”进行概念化:一项批判性解释性综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Dec;39(12):1383-1395. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01074-x. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Experiences With Health Care Services in Switzerland Among Immigrant Women With Chronic Illnesses.瑞士慢性疾病移民女性的医疗服务体验。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;8:553438. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.553438. eCollection 2020.
7
Assessing capability in economic evaluation: a life course approach?评估经济评估能力:一种生命历程方法?
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1027-6.
8
We Respect Their Autonomy and Dignity, But How Do We Value Patient-Reported Experiences?我们尊重他们的自主权和尊严,但我们如何评估患者报告的体验呢?
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Nov 7;3(2):2381468318807458. doi: 10.1177/2381468318807458. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
9
The patient experience in community mental health services for older people: a concept mapping approach to support the development of a new quality measure.老年人社区心理健康服务中的患者体验:一种支持开发新质量衡量标准的概念映射方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3231-6.
10
Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK.定性过程研究,探索在英国初级保健中自我管理高血压的数字干预措施的感知负担和益处。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 8;8(5):e020843. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020843.
哪些医疗服务体验对服务使用者重要,原因是什么?批判性综合解释和概念图。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17(2):70-8. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
4
Hospital survey shows improvements in patient experience.医院调查显示患者体验有所改善。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2061-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0876.
5
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.健康领域的选择实验:优点、缺点、问题以及迈向更光明的未来。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2009 Oct;4(Pt 4):527-46. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990193.
6
Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using Best-Worst Scaling: comparison of various methods of analysis.使用最佳-最差比例标度法估计对皮肤科会诊的偏好:多种分析方法的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 18;8:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-76.
7
Investigating Choice Experiments for Preferences of Older People (ICEPOP): evaluative spaces in health economics.老年人偏好的选择实验研究(ICEPOP):健康经济学中的评估空间
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Oct;13 Suppl 3:31-7. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008024.
8
What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment.对于患有长期疾病的患者来说,什么结果是重要的?一项离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):331-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00419.x. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
9
The best-worst scaling approach: an alternative to Schwartz's Values Survey.最佳-最差尺度法:施瓦茨价值观调查问卷的替代方法。
J Pers Assess. 2008 Jul;90(4):335-47. doi: 10.1080/00223890802107925.
10
Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people.评估老年人的ICECAP能力指数。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(5):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.015. Epub 2008 Jun 21.