Suppr超能文献

我们能否从唾液或口腔拭子中检测出口腔鳞状细胞癌的生物标志物?

Can we detect biomarkers of oral squamous cell carcinoma from saliva or mouth swabs?

机构信息

Dental Core Trainee Year 2, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK.

出版信息

Evid Based Dent. 2022 Mar;23(1):32-33. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0248-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

Abstract

Aim To determine the accuracy of using saliva and oral cytology swabs in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by detecting aberrantly hypermethylated DNA.Data sources Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science with no language or article restrictions. Additionally, LILACS database, OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched.Study selection Studies published since the first report proposing DNA hypermethylation for head and neck carcinomas in 2001 until 2020 were included. The diagnoses of oral cancer were limited to OSCC. Authors screened titles and abstracts for relevance, before further screening of full texts and a consensus for inclusion was reached. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 22 studies, and 11 were selected for meta-analysis.Data analysis Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using a series of investigations including the Haldane-Anscombe correction, forest plots, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Deeks' funnel plots. Differences in the pooled estimates of the application of both single and combined hypermethylation markers were assessed using Cochran's Q test and Higgins' I2 test. Random-effects meta-regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of variation in sensitivity and false-positive rates, and to identify sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses removed outliers.Results All studies suggest that DNA hypermethylation can discriminate between OSCC and premalignant conditions or normal mucosa. Using summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, the sensitivity of combined markers was higher than single markers, and specificity of both combined and single markers was comparable. The biomarkers evaluated had fair-to-excellent sensitivity and good-to-excellent specificity for discriminating OSCC from premalignant and normal mucosa. Four studies included in the review suggest that this method of detection is more applicable to patients who smoke due to increased hypermethylation rates.Conclusion Hypermethylation markers using saliva and oral swabs are more specific than sensitive for OSCC diagnosis. Combining different genes within the biomarker panel can improve diagnostic test accuracy. However, more blinded evaluation study designs with less bias which replicate real-world application are required to endorse the use of saliva sampling and oral swabs in oral oncology.

摘要

目的

通过检测异常高甲基化 DNA,确定唾液和口腔细胞学拭子用于诊断口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的准确性。

数据来源

包括 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 Web of Science 在内的电子数据库,无语言或文章限制。此外,还搜索了 LILACS 数据库、OpenGrey 和 Google Scholar。

研究选择

纳入了自 2001 年首次提出 DNA 甲基化用于头颈部癌以来发表的研究。口腔癌的诊断仅限于 OSCC。作者首先筛选标题和摘要以确定相关性,然后进一步筛选全文,并达成纳入共识。对 22 项研究进行了定性分析,并选择了 11 项进行荟萃分析。

数据分析

使用一系列研究进行诊断测试准确性荟萃分析,包括 Haldane-Anscombe 校正、森林图、接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线和 Deeks 漏斗图。使用 Cochran's Q 检验和 Higgins' I2 检验评估单个和组合高甲基化标记物应用的汇总估计值之间的差异。随机效应荟萃回归分析用于评估灵敏度和假阳性率变化的影响,并确定异质性的来源。敏感性分析去除了异常值。

结果

所有研究均表明,DNA 甲基化可区分 OSCC 与癌前状态或正常黏膜。使用汇总接收者操作特征(SROC)曲线,组合标记物的灵敏度高于单个标记物,且组合和单个标记物的特异性相当。评估的生物标志物在区分 OSCC 与癌前和正常黏膜方面具有良好至优秀的灵敏度和良好至优秀的特异性。综述中包含的四项研究表明,由于高甲基化率增加,这种检测方法在吸烟患者中更适用。

结论

使用唾液和口腔拭子的高甲基化标记物对 OSCC 诊断的特异性高于敏感性。在生物标志物面板中组合不同的基因可以提高诊断测试的准确性。然而,需要更多具有较少偏差的、更能真实反映实际应用的双盲评估研究设计来支持在口腔肿瘤学中使用唾液采样和口腔拭子。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验