Genesis Genoma Lab, Genetic Diagnosis, Clinical Genetics and Research, Athens, Greece.
Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jun;39(6):1341-1349. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02461-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the clinical outcome in patients with advanced maternal age (AMA), recurrent miscarriages (RM), and recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Retrospective cohort study from a single IVF center and a single genetics laboratory. One hundred seventy-six patients undergoing PGT-A were assigned to three groups: an AMA group, an RM group, and a RIF group. Two hundred seventy-nine patients that did not undergo PGT-A were used as controls and subgrouped similarly to the PGT-A cohort. For the PGT-A groups, trophectoderm biopsy was performed and array comparative genomic hybridization was used for PGT-A. Clinical outcomes were compared with the control groups.
In the RM group, we observed a significant decrease of early pregnancy loss rates in the PGT-A group (18.1% vs 75%) and a significant increase in live birth rate per transfer (50% vs 12.5%) and live birth rate per patient (36% vs 12.5%). In the RIF group, a statistically significant increase in the implantation rate per transfer (69.5% vs 33.3%) as well as the live birth rate per embryo transfer (47.8% vs 19%) was observed. In the AMA group, a statistically significant reduction in biochemical pregnancy loss was observed (3.7% vs 31.5%); however, live birth rates per embryo transfer and per patient were not significantly higher than the control group.
Our results agree with recently published studies, which suggest caution in the universal application of PGT-A in women with infertility. Instead, a more personalized approach by choosing the right candidates for PGT-A intervention should be followed.
研究胚胎植入前遗传学检测(PGT-A)是否能改善高龄产妇(AMA)、反复性流产(RM)和反复着床失败(RIF)患者的临床结局。
这是一项来自单个 IVF 中心和单个遗传学实验室的回顾性队列研究。将 176 例行 PGT-A 的患者分为 AMA 组、RM 组和 RIF 组。279 例未行 PGT-A 的患者作为对照组,并按与 PGT-A 组类似的方式进行亚组分析。对于 PGT-A 组,进行滋养外胚层活检,并进行 PGT-A 阵列比较基因组杂交。将临床结局与对照组进行比较。
在 RM 组中,PGT-A 组的早期妊娠丢失率显著降低(18.1%比 75%),每个移植周期的活产率显著升高(50%比 12.5%),每个患者的活产率显著升高(36%比 12.5%)。在 RIF 组中,每个移植周期的种植率显著升高(69.5%比 33.3%),每个胚胎移植的活产率也显著升高(47.8%比 19%)。在 AMA 组中,生化妊娠丢失率显著降低(3.7%比 31.5%);然而,每个胚胎移植和每个患者的活产率并不明显高于对照组。
我们的研究结果与最近发表的研究一致,这些研究表明在不孕症患者中普遍应用 PGT-A 时应谨慎。相反,应该采用更个性化的方法,选择合适的 PGT-A 干预候选者。