Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶与头孢孟多治疗肺炎的安全性和有效性的多中心比较评估

Comparative multicentre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime versus cefamandole for pneumonia.

作者信息

Yangco B G, Palumbo J A, Nolen T, Lifland P W, Schleupner C J

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Oct;18(4):521-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.4.521.

Abstract

Ceftazidime and cefamandole were compared in a randomized multicentre trial in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Of 290 patients enrolled, 92 patients in the ceftazidime group and 71 patients in the cefamandole group were evaluable. Geometric mean MICs of organisms isolated and tested to ceftazidime were within achievable therapeutic serum concentrations of ceftazidime. Satisfactory clinical responses were observed in 91% (84/92) of ceftazidime-treated patients and 83% (59/71) of cefamandole-treated patients (P greater than 0.05). Superinfection occurred in one (1%) ceftazidime-treated patient and in five (7%) cefamandole-treated patients. Side effects were infrequent with either treatment. Ceftazidime is as safe and effective as cefamandole for the treatment of pneumonia due to a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

摘要

在一项针对住院肺炎患者的随机多中心试验中,对头孢他啶和头孢孟多进行了比较。在纳入的290例患者中,头孢他啶组有92例患者、头孢孟多组有71例患者可进行评估。分离出并对其进行头孢他啶检测的微生物的几何平均最低抑菌浓度处于头孢他啶可达到的治疗性血清浓度范围内。头孢他啶治疗的患者中有91%(84/92)观察到满意的临床反应,头孢孟多治疗的患者中有83%(59/71)观察到满意的临床反应(P大于0.05)。1例(1%)接受头孢他啶治疗的患者和5例(7%)接受头孢孟多治疗的患者发生了二重感染。两种治疗的副作用都不常见。对于由多种革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体引起的肺炎,头孢他啶与头孢孟多一样安全有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验