Fieve R R, Goodnick P J, Peselow E D, Barouche F, Schlegel A
J Clin Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;47(11):560-2.
Seventy patients with unipolar major depressive disorder were treated with fluoxetine or placebo in a 6-week double-blind trial and were evaluated by changes in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the global improvement measure of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. High correlations were found between the changes in HAM-D scores from baseline to endpoint and the final CGI improvement ratings. In patients with moderate depression (baseline HAM-D score of 20 or more), the differences in endpoint analysis between active treatment and placebo groups were significant. A persistent pattern of improvement was noted in 27% of those receiving fluoxetine but in none of those receiving placebo. Physician and patient evaluations as determined by the improvement measure of the CGI were closely correlated.
70名单相重度抑郁症患者在一项为期6周的双盲试验中接受了氟西汀或安慰剂治疗,并通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评分变化及临床总体印象量表(CGI)的总体改善指标进行评估。发现从基线到终点HAM-D评分的变化与最终CGI改善评级之间存在高度相关性。在中度抑郁症患者(基线HAM-D评分为20分或更高)中,活性治疗组与安慰剂组在终点分析上的差异具有显著性。接受氟西汀治疗的患者中有27%呈现持续改善模式,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者中无一例出现这种情况。由CGI改善指标所确定的医生和患者评估密切相关。