Anatomic Pulmonary Resection is Associated With Improved Survival in Typical Carcinoid Lung Tumor Patients.

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of resection for a patient with a typical carcinoid tumor has been controversial. Studies suggest that wedge resection is an adequate oncologic operation for this tumor type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the National Cancer Database to determine an optimal surgical resection for patients with a typical carcinoid tumor. We determined the number of patients who had typical carcinoid tumors. We then performed a survival analysis of the propensity-matched group of patients having a pathologic stage I typical carcinoid tumor who had undergone anatomic pulmonary resection (lobectomy and segmentectomy) or wedge resection.

RESULTS

A total of 10,265 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria: 8956 (87%) had a typical carcinoid tumor, while 1309 patients (13%) had an atypical carcinoid tumor. Among patients with typical carcinoid tumors, there were 7163 patients (80%) who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection (6755 patients with lobectomy, 94% and 408 patients with segmentectomy, 6%) and 1793 patients (20%) who underwent wedge resection. In this cohort, patients who had an anatomic resection had significantly improved 5-y survival compared to patients who had wedge resection (91% versus 84%, P < 0.001). In the propensity score-matched group of stage I typical carcinoid tumors (n = 1348), the patients who had an anatomic resection had significantly improved survival compared to patients who had wedge resections (89% versus 85%, P = 0.01) at 5 y.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic resection compared to wedge resection was associated with improved survival in patients with early-stage typical carcinoid lung cancer. Surgically fit patients should be considered for anatomic resection for typical carcinoid tumors.