Li Muyu, Zeng Qingpeng, Chen Yuxing, Zhao Jun
Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):5969-5980. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-745. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Current guidelines recommend anatomical resection and mediastinal lymph node resection for stage I to IIIA pulmonary carcinoids (PCs). The role of wedge resection in stage IA PCs remains controversial, previous studies focused on typical carcinoids (TCs) while differentiating histological subtypes preoperatively is not easy. We aimed to study the effect of wedge resection and lymph node examination (LNE) in patients with stage IA PCs.
Patients who underwent anatomical and wedge resection for stage T1N0M0 lung carcinoid tumors between 2004 and 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were also divided into a non-LNE group and an LNE group. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to calculate and compare overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance the variables between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were developed to determine prognostic factors.
A total of 2,029 patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors were included in this study, 1,450 underwent lobectomy, 147 underwent segmentectomy and 432 underwent wedge resection. Initially, 5-year survival differed marginally between wedge and anatomical resection (91% 95%, P=0.051), but lost significance after adjustment. LNE improved 5-year survival (95% 89%, P=0.003), and this remained significant after adjustment. In multivariate cox analysis, LNE remained a significant variable while extent of resection was not. This result also remained consistent after adjustment. OS was comparable between wedge resection and anatomical resection when at least 1 lymph node was examined.
For early-stage PC, wedge resection was not inferior to anatomical resection in terms of OS, while LNE significantly increased the survival in both multivariate and matched studies. The relationship between surgical extent and survival in the unadjusted study may be attributed to the lower rate of LNE in wedge resection. Our findings support wedge resection with emphasis on LNE in early-stage PCs.
当前指南推荐对Ⅰ期至ⅢA期肺类癌(PC)进行解剖性切除及纵隔淋巴结切除。楔形切除在ⅠA期PC中的作用仍存在争议,既往研究主要聚焦于典型类癌(TC),而术前区分组织学亚型并不容易。我们旨在研究楔形切除及淋巴结检查(LNE)对ⅠA期PC患者的影响。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中识别出2004年至2019年间因T1N0M0期肺类癌肿瘤接受解剖性和楔形切除的患者。患者还被分为非LNE组和LNE组。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验来计算和比较总生存期(OS)。倾向评分匹配(PSM)和逆概率处理加权(IPTW)用于平衡组间变量。建立单因素和多因素Cox比例风险模型以确定预后因素。
本研究共纳入2029例支气管肺类癌肿瘤患者,1450例行肺叶切除术,147例行肺段切除术,432例行楔形切除术。最初,楔形切除和解剖性切除的5年生存率略有差异(91%对95%,P=0.051),但调整后差异无统计学意义。LNE提高了5年生存率(95%对89%,P=0.003),调整后仍具有显著意义。在多因素Cox分析中,LNE仍然是一个显著变量,而切除范围则不是。调整后该结果也保持一致。当至少检查1个淋巴结时,楔形切除和解剖性切除的OS相当。
对于早期PC,就OS而言,楔形切除并不逊于解剖性切除,而LNE在多因素和匹配研究中均显著提高了生存率。未调整研究中手术范围与生存之间的关系可能归因于楔形切除中LNE的比例较低。我们的研究结果支持在早期PC中强调LNE的楔形切除。