Suppr超能文献

接触世界卫生组织的AWaRe抗生素与多重耐药菌的分离:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Exposure to World Health Organization's AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multidrug resistant bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sulis Giorgia, Sayood Sena, Katukoori Shashi, Bollam Neha, George Ige, Yaeger Lauren H, Chavez Miguel A, Tetteh Emmanuel, Yarrabelli Sindhu, Pulcini Celine, Harbarth Stephan, Mertz Dominik, Sharland Mike, Moja Lorenzo, Huttner Benedikt, Gandra Sumanth

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Sep;28(9):1193-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic use drives antibiotic resistance.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature and estimate associations between prior exposure to antibiotics across World Health Organization's (WHO) AWaRe categories (Access, Watch, Reserve) and isolation of critical and high-priority multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) on the WHO priority pathogen list.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to 20/08/2020).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Case-control, cohort, or experimental studies that assessed the risk of infection/colonization with MDROs.

PARTICIPANTS

Inpatients or outpatients of any age and sex.

INTERVENTIONS

Prior exposure to antibiotics that could be categorized into the AWaRe framework.

DATA ANALYSIS

Tailored design-specific checklists applied to each included study. For each antibiotic/class, crude odds ratios (ORs) were pooled through random-effects meta-analyses, both overall and by MDRO. Heterogeneity was examined.

RESULTS

We identified 349 eligible studies. All were observational, prone to bias due to design and lack of adjustment for confounding, and not primarily designed to compare associations across AWaRe categories. We found statistically significant associations between prior exposure to almost all antibiotics/classes across AWaRe categories and colonization/infection with any MDRO. We observed higher ORs for Watch and Reserve antibiotics than with Access antibiotics. First generation cephalosporins (Access) had the least association with any MDRO colonization/infection (58 studies; OR = 1.2 [95% CI: 1.0-1.4]), whereas strongest associations were estimated for linezolid (Reserve) (22 studies; OR = 2.6 [95% CI: 2.1-3.1]), followed by carbapenems (Watch) (237 studies; OR = 2.3 [95% CI: 2.1-2.5]). There was high heterogeneity for all antibiotic/MDRO associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimising use of Access antibiotics is likely to reduce the selection of MDROs and global antibiotic resistance. Despite data limitations, our study offers a strong rationale for further adoption of AWaRe as an important tool to improve antibiotic use globally.

摘要

背景

抗生素的使用会导致抗生素耐药性。

目的

系统回顾文献,评估世界卫生组织(WHO)的AWaRe分类(准入、观察、储备)中先前使用抗生素与WHO优先病原体列表上的关键和高优先级多重耐药菌(MDROs)分离之间的关联。

数据来源

Embase、Ovid Medline、Scopus、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和ClinicalTrials.gov(从创建到2020年8月20日)。

研究纳入标准

评估MDROs感染/定植风险的病例对照研究、队列研究或实验研究。

参与者

任何年龄和性别的住院患者或门诊患者。

干预措施

先前使用的抗生素可归类到AWaRe框架中。

数据分析

针对每项纳入研究应用特定设计的检查表。对于每种抗生素/类别,通过随机效应荟萃分析汇总总体及按MDRO分类的粗比值比(OR)。检查异质性。

结果

我们确定了349项符合条件的研究。所有研究均为观察性研究,因设计和缺乏混杂因素调整而容易产生偏倚,且并非主要设计用于比较AWaRe类别之间的关联。我们发现,AWaRe类别中几乎所有抗生素/类别的先前使用与任何MDRO的定植/感染之间存在统计学上的显著关联。我们观察到,观察类和储备类抗生素的OR高于准入类抗生素。第一代头孢菌素(准入类)与任何MDRO定植/感染的关联最小(58项研究;OR = 1.2 [95% CI:1.0 - 1.4]),而利奈唑胺(储备类)的关联估计最强(22项研究;OR = 2.6 [95% CI:2.1 - 3.1]),其次是碳青霉烯类(观察类)(237项研究;OR = 2.3 [95% CI:2.1 - 2.5])。所有抗生素/MDRO关联均存在高度异质性。

结论

优化准入类抗生素的使用可能会减少MDROs的选择和全球抗生素耐药性。尽管存在数据限制,但我们的研究为进一步采用AWaRe作为改善全球抗生素使用的重要工具提供了有力依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验