Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Jun;226:103562. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103562. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
The cognitive reflection test (CRT) measures the ability to suppress an intuitive, but incorrect, answer that easily comes to mind. The relationship between the CRT and different cognitive biases has been widely studied. However, whether cognitive reflection is related to attentional control is less well studied. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the inhibitory component of the CRT, measured by the number of non-intuitive answers of the CRT (Inhibitory Control Score), is related to the control of visual attention in visual tasks that involve overriding a bias in what to attend: an anti-saccade task and a visual search task. To test this possibility, we analyzed whether the CRT-Inhibitory Control Score (CRT-ICS) predicted attention allocation in each task. We compared the relationship between the CRT-ICS to two other potential predictors of attentional control: numeracy and visual working memory (VWM). Participants who scored lower on the CRT-ICS made more errors in the "look-away" trials in the anti-saccade task. Participants who scored higher on the CRT-ICS looked more often towards more informative color subsets in the visual search task. However, when controlling for numeracy and visual working memory, CRT-ICS scores were only related to the control of visual attention in the anti-saccade task.
认知反射测试(CRT)衡量的是抑制一种直觉但错误的答案的能力,这种答案很容易出现在脑海中。CRT 与不同认知偏差之间的关系已经得到了广泛的研究。然而,认知反射是否与注意力控制有关,研究得就比较少了。本文的目的是探讨 CRT 的抑制成分(通过 CRT 的非直觉答案数量来衡量,即抑制控制得分)是否与视觉任务中对注意力的控制有关,这些任务涉及克服对注意什么的偏见:反扫视任务和视觉搜索任务。为了验证这一可能性,我们分析了 CRT 抑制控制得分(CRT-ICS)是否可以预测每个任务中的注意力分配。我们比较了 CRT-ICS 与另外两个注意力控制的潜在预测指标(计算能力和视觉工作记忆(VWM))之间的关系。在反扫视任务中“看别处”试验中,CRT-ICS 得分较低的参与者犯的错误更多。CRT-ICS 得分较高的参与者在视觉搜索任务中更频繁地看向更具信息量的颜色子集。然而,当控制计算能力和视觉工作记忆时,CRT-ICS 得分仅与反扫视任务中的视觉注意力控制有关。