Baab D A, Opsvig E J
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Sep;13(8):795-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00884.x.
The subgingival flora of bleeding and nonbleeding 4-6 mm pockets was investigated using phase-contrast microscopy. Subgingival plaque was sampled from 11 patients with generalized moderate periodontitis. 4 subgingival samples were obtained from each patient, 2 from sites that bled upon standardized probing force and 2 from sites that did not. The amounts of gingival inflammation, supragingival plaque, attachment level and pocket depth were also assessed at each site. The %s of 4 bacterial morphotypes were assessed using phase-contrast microscopy. No significant differences were found in the %s of cocci, motile rods, or spirochetes between bleeding and nonbleeding sites. Significant correlations were found, however, between the % of spirochetes and probing depth, attachment level, and gingival inflammation. The observations indicate that the use of bleeding on probing may not be justified as an indicator of infection by those "periodontopathic" bacteria identifiable by phase-contrast microscopy. However, limitations in the microscopic method may have prevented us from observing differences between the 2 types of sites on a species level.
采用相差显微镜研究了4-6毫米深度的出血性和非出血性牙周袋的龈下菌群。从11例中度广泛性牙周炎患者采集龈下菌斑。每位患者采集4个龈下样本,2个来自于在标准探诊力下出血的部位,2个来自于不出血的部位。同时对每个部位的牙龈炎症程度、龈上菌斑、附着水平和牙周袋深度进行评估。使用相差显微镜评估4种细菌形态类型的百分比。出血部位和非出血部位之间的球菌、活动杆菌或螺旋体百分比未发现显著差异。然而,螺旋体百分比与探诊深度、附着水平和牙龈炎症之间存在显著相关性。这些观察结果表明,探诊出血作为相差显微镜可识别的“牙周病原菌”感染指标可能不合理。然而,显微镜检查方法的局限性可能使我们无法在物种水平上观察到两种类型部位之间的差异。