Suppr超能文献

损伤控制剖腹手术中延迟吻合与早期吻合对输液量和负压伤口治疗引流量的影响差异:延迟吻合时是否需要限制输液?单中心回顾性分析

Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Tanahashi Yohta, Sato Hisaho, Kawakami Akiko, Sasaki Shusaku, Nishinari Yutaka, Ishida Kaoru, Kojika Masahiro, Endo Shigeatsu, Inoue Yoshihiro, Sasaki Akira

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Mar 8;7(1):e000860. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000860. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with damage control laparotomy (DCL), infusion volume and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure. The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this research is to evaluate whether the difference between early anastomosis and delayed anastomosis in DCL is related to infusion volume and NPWT output volume.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective analysis targeted patients managed with TAC during emergency surgery for trauma or intra-abdominal sepsis between January 2011 and December 2019. It included patients who underwent repair/anastomosis/colostomy in the first surgery and patients who underwent intestinal resection in the first surgery followed by delayed anastomosis with no intestinal continuity.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were managed with TAC using NPWT, including 19 cases of repair, 17 of colostomy, and 37 of anastomosis. In 16 patients (trauma 5, sepsis 11) with early anastomosis and 21 patients (trauma 16, sepsis 5) with delayed anastomosis, there was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.2318) or NPWT output volume (p=0.7128) 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, there was no difference in the occurrence of suture failure (p=0.8428). During the second-look surgery after 48 hours, the anastomosis was further postponed for 48% of the patients who underwent delayed anastomosis. There was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.0783) up to the second-look surgery between the patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed and those who underwent delayed anastomosis, but there was a tendency toward a large NPWT output volume (p=0.024) in the postponed delayed anastomosis group.

CONCLUSION

Delayed anastomosis may be managed with the same infusion volume as that used for early anastomosis. There is also the option of postponing anastomosis if the planned delayed anastomosis is complicated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV.

摘要

目的

在采用损伤控制剖腹术(DCL)进行临时腹部关闭(TAC)期间,输液量和负压伤口治疗(NPWT)排出量与一期筋膜关闭的成功率和预后相关。吻合术可能也是如此。本研究的目的是评估DCL中早期吻合术与延迟吻合术之间的差异是否与输液量和NPWT排出量有关。

方法

这项单中心回顾性分析针对2011年1月至2019年12月期间因创伤或腹腔内感染而在急诊手术中接受TAC治疗的患者。它包括在首次手术中进行修复/吻合术/结肠造口术的患者,以及在首次手术中进行肠切除术后进行延迟吻合术且无肠道连续性的患者。

结果

73例患者采用NPWT进行TAC治疗,其中修复19例,结肠造口术17例,吻合术37例。在16例早期吻合术患者(创伤5例,感染11例)和21例延迟吻合术患者(创伤16例,感染5例)中,术后48小时的输液量(p=0.2318)或NPWT排出量(p=0.7128)无差异。此外,缝合失败的发生率也无差异(p=0.8428)。在48小时后的二次探查手术中,48%接受延迟吻合术的患者的吻合术被进一步推迟。延迟吻合术被推迟的患者与接受延迟吻合术的患者在二次探查手术前的输液量(p=0.0783)无差异,但在推迟的延迟吻合术组中,NPWT排出量有增加的趋势(p=0.024)。

结论

延迟吻合术的输液量可与早期吻合术相同。如果计划的延迟吻合术出现并发症,也可以选择推迟吻合术。

证据水平

治疗/护理管理,四级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a3/8905971/46ad623676d1/tsaco-2021-000860f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验