• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重腹部脓毒症的开放性腹腔关闭方法:一项回顾性队列研究。

Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Poillucci Gaetano, Podda Mauro, Russo Giulia, Perri Sergio Gaetano, Ipri Domenico, Manetti Gabriele, Lolli Maria Giulia, De Angelis Renato

机构信息

Department of General and Specialized Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Universitario Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Department of General, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Policlinico Universitario "D. Casula", University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1819-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0
PMID:32377924
Abstract

PURPOSE

The open abdomen (OA) procedure as part of damage control surgery represents a significant surgical advance in severe intra-abdominal infections. Major techniques used for OA are negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and non-NPWT. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effects of different abdominal closure methods and their outcomes in patients presenting with abdominal sepsis treated with OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of patients affected by severe intra-abdominal sepsis treated with OA. Demographic features, mortality prediction score, abdominal closure methods, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality rates of patients were determined and compared.

RESULTS

This study included 106 patients, of whom 77 underwent OA with NPWT and 29 with non-NPWT. OA duration was longer in NPWT patients (p = 0.007). In-hospital mortality rates in NPWT and in non-NPWT patients were 40.3% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.126), with an overall 30-day mortality rate of 18.2% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.0002). After emergency colorectal surgery, patients who underwent OA with NPWT had a lower rate of colostomy (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

NPWT is the best temporary abdominal closure technique to decrease mortality and colostomy rates in patients managed with OA for severe intra-abdominal infections.

摘要

目的

作为损伤控制手术一部分的开放腹腔(OA)手术是严重腹腔内感染治疗中的一项重大外科进展。用于OA的主要技术是负压伤口治疗(NPWT)和非NPWT。本回顾性研究的目的是评估不同腹部闭合方法对接受OA治疗的腹部脓毒症患者的效果及其结局。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了接受OA治疗的严重腹腔内脓毒症患者的临床结局。确定并比较了患者的人口统计学特征、死亡率预测评分、腹部闭合方法、住院时间、并发症及死亡率。

结果

本研究纳入106例患者,其中77例接受NPWT的OA治疗,29例接受非NPWT的OA治疗。NPWT患者的OA持续时间更长(p = 0.007)。NPWT患者和非NPWT患者的院内死亡率分别为40.3%和51.7%(p = 0.126),30天总死亡率分别为18.2%和51.7%(p = 0.0002)。急诊结直肠手术后,接受NPWT的OA治疗的患者结肠造口率较低(p = 0.025)。

结论

对于接受OA治疗的严重腹腔内感染患者,NPWT是降低死亡率和结肠造口率的最佳临时腹部闭合技术。

相似文献

1
Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.严重腹部脓毒症的开放性腹腔关闭方法:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1819-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Management of the open abdomen using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in severe abdominal sepsis: A review of 48 cases in Hospital Mexico, Costa Rica.在严重腹部脓毒症中使用负压伤口治疗联合灌洗法处理开放性腹部伤口:对哥斯达黎加墨西哥医院48例病例的回顾
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
3
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus modified Barker Vacuum Pack as temporary abdominal closure technique for Open Abdomen management: a four-year experience.负压伤口治疗与改良巴克真空包装作为开放性腹部处理的临时腹部闭合技术:四年经验
BMC Surg. 2017 Jul 21;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0281-3.
4
Open Abdomen and Fluid Instillation in the Septic Abdomen: Results from the IROA Study.开放性腹部和腹腔灌洗在感染性腹水中的应用:IROA 研究结果。
World J Surg. 2020 Dec;44(12):4032-4040. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05728-3. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
5
Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.负压伤口治疗联合动态筋膜缝合有助于脓毒症患者开放性腹部伤口的延迟闭合。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):735-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3251-6. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在接受开放腹部技术治疗的患者中的有效性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):575-84. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001126.
7
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Petrolatum Gauze and a Bogota Bag to Manage Postoperative Midline Abdominal Wound Dehiscence: A Pilot, Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.负压伤口疗法与凡士林纱布和 Bogota 袋治疗术后中线腹部伤口裂开的比较:一项试点、非随机对照试验。
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 May;66(5):38-45.
8
Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy.开放式腹部管理:负压伤口疗法的临床结局和安全性的全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828b8bc8.
9
Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases.严重腹腔内感染开放性腹腔处理中早期与延迟源头控制的比较:111例回顾性分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):707-712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y.
10
Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.系统评价和循证推荐在开放性腹部中使用负压伤口治疗。
Int J Surg. 2014 Oct;12(10):1105-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Narrative Review of Open Abdomen Management and Comparison of Different Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques.开放性腹部管理的叙述性综述及不同临时腹部闭合技术的比较
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 10;4:14119. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14119. eCollection 2025.
2
Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.继发性腹膜炎患者采用真空辅助闭合术或按需再次剖腹手术进行一期闭合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 May 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00615-5.
3
Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines.创伤和非创伤患者的开放性腹部:WSES 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Feb 2;13:7. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4. eCollection 2018.
2
Abdominal compartment syndrome and the open abdomen: any unresolved issues?腹部间室综合征与开放性腹部:仍存在未解问题?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Feb;23(1):73-78. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000371.
3
Treatments and other prognostic factors in the management of the open abdomen: A systematic review.开放性腹部管理中的治疗方法及其他预后因素:一项系统综述。
与一期腹部缝合相比,负压封闭引流显著降低继发性腹膜炎患者的外科术后并发症:一项比较性回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):387-400. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12472. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
4
Establishment and evaluation of an improved rat model of open abdomen.建立并评估一种改良的大鼠腹壁切开模型。
Animal Model Exp Med. 2024 Aug;7(4):562-569. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12376. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
5
Is damage control surgery useful in the treatment of colorectal perforation? A single-center case-control study.损伤控制手术在结直肠穿孔治疗中有用吗?一项单中心病例对照研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 25;85(4):645-649. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000334. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Abdominal and thoracic wall closure: damage control surgery's cinderella.腹部和胸壁关闭:损伤控制手术的灰姑娘。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 Jun 30;52(2):e4144777. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i2.4777. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
7
Tertiary peritonitis: considerations for complex team-based care.三级腹膜炎:复杂的团队式治疗方案需要考虑的因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):811-825. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01750-9. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
Is open abdominal management useful in nontrauma emergency surgery for older adults? A single-center retrospective study.开放性腹部管理在老年非创伤性急诊手术中是否有用?一项单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Today. 2021 Aug;51(8):1285-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02214-0. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):407-418. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001314.
4
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
5
The role of the open abdomen procedure in managing severe abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.开放腹腔手术在处理严重腹部脓毒症中的作用:世界急诊外科学会立场文件
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug 12;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0032-7. eCollection 2015.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.非创伤患者开放性腹部及临时腹部关闭技术的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2015 Apr;39(4):912-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6.
7
Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.系统评价和循证推荐在开放性腹部中使用负压伤口治疗。
Int J Surg. 2014 Oct;12(10):1105-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Time to first take-back operation predicts successful primary fascial closure in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy.首次剖腹探查手术时间可预测接受损伤控制性剖腹术患者初次筋膜关闭的成功。
Surgery. 2014 Aug;156(2):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
9
Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: the definitive data of the CIAOW Study.全球复杂性腹腔内感染:CIAOW 研究的明确数据。
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 May 14;9:37. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-37. eCollection 2014.
10
Factors affecting primary fascial closure of the open abdomen in the nontrauma patient.影响非创伤患者开放性腹部初次筋膜关闭的因素。
Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):777-83; discussion 783-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Aug 31.